| Literature DB >> 26418206 |
Jose Angel Sanchez-Izquierdo-Riera1, Esteban Molano-Alvarez, Ignacio Saez-de la Fuente, Javier Maynar-Moliner, Helena Marín-Mateos, Silvia Chacón-Alves.
Abstract
The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) may improve the safety of the continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) in the intensive care unit. We use this tool in three phases: 1) Retrospective observational study. 2) A process FMEA, with implementation of the improvement measures identified. 3) Cohort study after FMEA. We included 54 patients in the pre-FMEA group and 72 patients in the post-FMEA group. Comparing the risks frequencies per patient in both groups, we got less cases of under 24 hours of filter survival time in the post-FMEA group (31 patients 57.4% vs. 21 patients 29.6%; p < 0.05); less patients suffered circuit coagulation with inability to return the blood to the patient (25 patients [46.3%] vs. 16 patients [22.2%]; p < 0.05); 54 patients (100%) versus 5 (6.94%) did not get phosphorus levels monitoring (p < 0.05); in 14 patients (25.9%) versus 0 (0%), the CRRT prescription did not appear on medical orders. As a measure of improvement, we adopt a dynamic dosage management. After the process FMEA, there were several improvements in the management of intensive care unit patients receiving CRRT, and we consider it a useful tool for improving the safety of critically ill patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26418206 DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ASAIO J ISSN: 1058-2916 Impact factor: 2.872