Octavia Bane1, Cecilia Besa1,2, Mathilde Wagner1, Niels Oesingmann3, Hongfa Zhu4, Maria Isabel Fiel4, Bachir Taouli1,2. 1. Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 3. Siemens Healthcare, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify baseline relaxation rates R2* and R1 in the abdomen, their changes after respiratory challenges, and their reproducibility in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at 1.5T and 3.0T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: R2* measurements were acquired in the liver in 8 volunteers and 27 patients with 34 HCCs using multiecho T2* at baseline and after respiratory challenges with 100% oxygen (O2 ) and carbogen (CB = 95%O2 /5%CO2 ). R1 was measured at 1.5T in one volunteer and 21 patients with 23 HCCs. Test-retest coefficient of variation (CV) was assessed in 10 subjects. Intra- and interobserver variability of R2* and R1 measurements was assessed in 12 and 10 patients, respectively. Parameters for HCC, liver, and muscle were compared between baseline and after gas challenges. RESULTS: We observed that R2* and R1 imaging of HCCs with O2 and CB is feasible and reproducible (test-retest CV R2*<15%/R1 <5%; intra- and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient R2*>0.88/R1 >0.7 and CV R2*<7%/R1 <3% at 1.5T). R2* measurements were observed to be less reproducible at 3.0T (CV<35%). There was a statistically significant decrease in R2* values in HCC before and after O2 (P = 0.02) and increase in R1 after O2 (P = 0.004). CB had no significant effect (P R2* = 0.47/R1 = 0.278). CONCLUSION: R2* measurements in HCC and liver parenchyma are more reproducible at 1.5T than at 3.0T, and with O2 than with CB challenge. We observed a decrease in R2* and an increase in R1 of HCCs from baseline in response to O2 challenge, as expected with increased tissue and blood oxygenation.
PURPOSE: To quantify baseline relaxation rates R2* and R1 in the abdomen, their changes after respiratory challenges, and their reproducibility in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at 1.5T and 3.0T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: R2* measurements were acquired in the liver in 8 volunteers and 27 patients with 34 HCCs using multiecho T2* at baseline and after respiratory challenges with 100% oxygen (O2 ) and carbogen (CB = 95%O2 /5%CO2 ). R1 was measured at 1.5T in one volunteer and 21 patients with 23 HCCs. Test-retest coefficient of variation (CV) was assessed in 10 subjects. Intra- and interobserver variability of R2* and R1 measurements was assessed in 12 and 10 patients, respectively. Parameters for HCC, liver, and muscle were compared between baseline and after gas challenges. RESULTS: We observed that R2* and R1 imaging of HCCs with O2 and CB is feasible and reproducible (test-retest CV R2*<15%/R1 <5%; intra- and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient R2*>0.88/R1 >0.7 and CV R2*<7%/R1 <3% at 1.5T). R2* measurements were observed to be less reproducible at 3.0T (CV<35%). There was a statistically significant decrease in R2* values in HCC before and after O2 (P = 0.02) and increase in R1 after O2 (P = 0.004). CB had no significant effect (P R2* = 0.47/R1 = 0.278). CONCLUSION: R2* measurements in HCC and liver parenchyma are more reproducible at 1.5T than at 3.0T, and with O2 than with CB challenge. We observed a decrease in R2* and an increase in R1 of HCCs from baseline in response to O2 challenge, as expected with increased tissue and blood oxygenation.
Authors: Greg Zaharchuk; Reed F Busse; Guy Rosenthal; Geoffery T Manley; Orit A Glenn; William P Dillon Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: N J Taylor; H Baddeley; K A Goodchild; M E Powell; M Thoumine; L A Culver; J J Stirling; M I Saunders; P J Hoskin; H Phillips; A R Padhani; J R Griffiths Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Heling Zhou; Olivier Belzile; Zhang Zhang; Jo Wagner; Chul Ahn; James A Richardson; Debabrata Saha; Rolf A Brekken; Ralph P Mason Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Donghan M Yang; Tatsuya J Arai; James W Campbell; Jenifer L Gerberich; Heling Zhou; Ralph P Mason Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Andrew J Patterson; Andrew N Priest; David J Bowden; Tess E Wallace; Ilse Patterson; Martin J Graves; David J Lomas Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 4.813