Literature DB >> 26416930

Bladder Function After Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele.

John W Brock1, Michael C Carr2, N Scott Adzick3, Pamela K Burrows4, John C Thomas5, Elizabeth A Thom4, Lori J Howell3, Jody A Farrell6, Mary E Dabrowiak7, Diana L Farmer6, Earl Y Cheng8, Bradley P Kropp9, Anthony A Caldamone10, Dorothy I Bulas11, Susan Tolivaisa12, Laurence S Baskin13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A substudy of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study evaluating urological outcomes was conducted.
METHODS: Pregnant women diagnosed with fetal myelomeningocele were randomly assigned to either prenatal or standard postnatal surgical repair. The substudy included patients randomly assigned after April 18, 2005. The primary outcome was defined in their children as death or the need for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) by 30 months of age characterized by prespecified criteria. Secondary outcomes included bladder and kidney abnormalities observed by urodynamics and renal/bladder ultrasound at 12 and 30 months, which were analyzed as repeated measures.
RESULTS: Of the 115 women enrolled in the substudy, the primary outcome occurred in 52% of children in the prenatal surgery group and 66% in the postnatal surgery group (relative risk [RR]: 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-1.07). Actual rates of CIC use were 38% and 51% in the prenatal and postnatal surgery groups, respectively (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.48-1.12). Prenatal surgery resulted in less trabeculation (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.79) and fewer cases of open bladder neck on urodynamics (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40-0.92) after adjustment by child's gender and lesion level. The difference in trabeculation was confirmed by ultrasound.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal surgery did not significantly reduce the need for CIC by 30 months of age but was associated with less bladder trabeculation and open bladder neck. The implications of these findings are unclear now, but support the need for long-term urologic follow-up of patients with myelomeningocele regardless of type of surgical repair.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26416930      PMCID: PMC4586733          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-2114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  14 in total

1.  Improved bladder function after prophylactic treatment of the high risk neurogenic bladder in newborns with myelomentingocele.

Authors:  M Kaefer; A Pabby; M Kelly; M Darbey; S B Bauer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The timing of primary neurosurgical repair significantly affects neurogenic bladder prognosis in children with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Tufan Tarcan; Fikret Fatih Onol; Yalçin Ilker; Harika Alpay; Ferruh Simşek; Memet Ozek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.

Authors:  L N Sutton; N S Adzick; L T Bilaniuk; M P Johnson; T M Crombleholme; A W Flake
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Long-term urological impact of fetal myelomeningocele closure.

Authors:  Douglass B Clayton; Stacy T Tanaka; Lisa Trusler; John C Thomas; John C Pope; Mark C Adams; John W Brock
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to myelomeningocele: neonatal versus childhood treatment.

Authors:  H Y Wu; L S Baskin; B A Kogan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Fetal intervention for myelomeningocele: effect on postnatal bladder function.

Authors:  N M Holmes; H T Nguyen; M R Harrison; D L Farmer; L S Baskin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  N Scott Adzick; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; John W Brock; Pamela K Burrows; Mark P Johnson; Lori J Howell; Jody A Farrell; Mary E Dabrowiak; Leslie N Sutton; Nalin Gupta; Noel B Tulipan; Mary E D'Alton; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Can Bladder Wall Thickness Predict Videourodynamic Findings in Children with Spina Bifida?

Authors:  Woo Jin Kim; Yoshiyuki Shiroyanagi; Yuichiro Yamazaki
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Predictive value of urodynamic evaluation in newborns with myelodysplasia.

Authors:  S B Bauer; M Hallett; S Khoshbin; R L Lebowitz; K R Winston; S Gibson; A H Colodny; A B Retik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-08-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Upper and lower urinary tract outcomes in adult myelomeningocele patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul W Veenboer; J L H Ruud Bosch; Floris W A van Asbeck; Laetitia M O de Kort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Using structured data entry systems in the electronic medical record to collect clinical data for quality and research: Can we efficiently serve multiple needs for complex patients with spina bifida?

Authors:  Jason P Van Batavia; Dana A Weiss; Christopher J Long; Julian Madison; Gus McCarthy; Natalie Plachter; Stephen A Zderic
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2018

Review 2.  Neuropathic bladders: Investigation and treatment through their lifetime.

Authors:  Peter D Metcalfe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Fetal surgery: a critical review.

Authors:  H Kitagawa; K C Pringle
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Prenatal surgery for spina bifida: a therapeutic dilemma. Proceedings of the SHINE conference, Belfast.

Authors:  Mano Shanmuganathan; Deborah A Sival; Kelly-Ann Eastwood; Katie Morris; Jacqueline Cartmill; Axel Heep; Janusz Bohosiewicz; Agnieszka Pastuszka; Alyson Hunter; Amanda Ali; Roy McConnell; Darach Crimmins; Fergal Malone; Carolyn Bailie; Jan Deprest; Cathy McKillop; Zarko Alfirevic; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Stephen Ong
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: some thoughts on ethical, legal, and psychological issues in a Western European situation.

Authors:  Frank Van Calenbergh; Luc Joyeux; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Urological Outcomes of Myelomeningocele and Lipomeningocele.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chan; Samantha K Sandlin; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  New directions in fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Sandra K Kabagambe; Y Julia Chen; Melissa A Vanover; Payam Saadai; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Low level myelomeningoceles: do they need prenatal surgery?

Authors:  Pierre-Aurelien Beuriat; Isabelle Poirot; Frederic Hameury; Delphine Demede; Kieron J Sweeney; Alexandru Szathmari; Federico Di Rocco; Carmine Mottolese
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele: review of the literature and future directions.

Authors:  Gregory G Heuer; Julie S Moldenhauer; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 10.  Fetal myelomeningocele repair: a narrative review of the history, current controversies and future directions.

Authors:  Kaeli J Yamashiro; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.