OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of real-time elastography (RTE) in an initial biopsy setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period from February 2011 to June 2012, 127 consecutive patients were included in the study. We used a Hitachi Preirus with Hi-RTE module, a prostate end-fire transrectal probe was used for RTE and for targeted biopsies, and a simultaneous biplane probe was used for the standard systematic biopsies. The peripheral zone of the prostate was divided into six regions, and each biopsy obtained was referred to a specific region. All patients were first examined with RTE and, if cancer was suspected, targeted biopsies were taken. A standard systematic 10-core biopsy was then taken in all patients. RESULTS: In all, 64 (50%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the initial biopsy setting. Three patients were diagnosed solely on RTE-targeted biopsies, 31 were found only in systematic biopsies, and 30 were correctly diagnosed with both methods. In the RTE-positive group there was a significantly higher frequency of positive cores, a lower prostate volume, a higher Gleason score, and a higher fraction of cancer tissue in each core. In a multiple regression model RTE was an independent marker for high-risk cancer. The sensitivity of 42% for all prostate cancers increased to 60% for high-grade prostate cancers. Similarly, the negative predictive value increased from 79% to 97%. An additional eight patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A positive RTE is an independent marker for detection of high-risk prostate cancer, and a negative RTE argues against such. RTE with targeted biopsies cannot replace systematic biopsies, but provides valuable additional information about the tumours.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of real-time elastography (RTE) in an initial biopsy setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period from February 2011 to June 2012, 127 consecutive patients were included in the study. We used a Hitachi Preirus with Hi-RTE module, a prostate end-fire transrectal probe was used for RTE and for targeted biopsies, and a simultaneous biplane probe was used for the standard systematic biopsies. The peripheral zone of the prostate was divided into six regions, and each biopsy obtained was referred to a specific region. All patients were first examined with RTE and, if cancer was suspected, targeted biopsies were taken. A standard systematic 10-core biopsy was then taken in all patients. RESULTS: In all, 64 (50%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the initial biopsy setting. Three patients were diagnosed solely on RTE-targeted biopsies, 31 were found only in systematic biopsies, and 30 were correctly diagnosed with both methods. In the RTE-positive group there was a significantly higher frequency of positive cores, a lower prostate volume, a higher Gleason score, and a higher fraction of cancer tissue in each core. In a multiple regression model RTE was an independent marker for high-risk cancer. The sensitivity of 42% for all prostate cancers increased to 60% for high-grade prostate cancers. Similarly, the negative predictive value increased from 79% to 97%. An additional eight patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A positive RTE is an independent marker for detection of high-risk prostate cancer, and a negative RTE argues against such. RTE with targeted biopsies cannot replace systematic biopsies, but provides valuable additional information about the tumours.
Authors: D Junker; T De Zordo; M Quentin; M Ladurner; J Bektic; W Horniger; W Jaschke; F Aigner Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 3.411