Literature DB >> 26415384

Comparison of the Diagnostic Image Quality of the Canine Maxillary Dentoalveolar Structures Obtained by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and 64-Multidetector Row Computed Tomography.

Jason W Soukup, Randi Drees, Lisa J Koenig, Christopher J Snyder, Scott Hetzel, Chanda R Miles, Tobias Schwarz.   

Abstract

The objective of this blinded study was to validate the use of cone beam computed tomography (C) for imaging of the canine maxillary dentoalveolar structures by comparing its diagnostic image quality with that of 64-multidetector row CT Sagittal slices of a tooth-bearing segment of the maxilla of a commercially purchased dog skull embedded in methylmethacrylate were obtained along a line parallel with the dental arch using a commercial histology diamond saw. The slice of tooth-bearing bone that best depicted the dentoalveolar structures was chosen and photographed. The maxillary segment was imaged with cone beam CT and 64-multidetector row CT. Four blinded evaluators compared the cone beam CT and 64-multidetector row CT images and image quality was scored as it related to the anatomy of dentoalveolar structures. Trabecular bone, enamel, dentin, pulp cavity, periodontal ligament space, and lamina dura were scored In addition, a score depicting the evaluators overall impression of the image was recorded. Images acquired with cone beam CT were found to be significantly superior in image quality to images acquired with 64-multidetector row CT overall, and in all scored categories. In our study setting cone beam CT was found to be a valid and clinically superior imaging modality for the canine maxillary dentoalveolar structures when compared to 64-multidetector row CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26415384      PMCID: PMC5140098          DOI: 10.1177/089875641503200201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Dent        ISSN: 0898-7564            Impact factor:   0.857


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine.

Authors:  Koji Hashimoto; Yoshinori Arai; Kazuo Iwai; Masao Araki; Shoji Kawashima; Masaaki Terakado
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.

Authors:  S Kapila; R S Conley; W E Harrell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Outcome of root canal treatment in dogs determined by periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Francisco Wanderley Garcia de Paula-Silva; Bassam Hassan; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Mário Roberto Leonardo; Min-Kai Wu
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Cone-beam computerized tomographic, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of periapical repair in dogs' post-endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Francisco Wanderley Garcia de Paula-Silva; Milton Santamaria; Mário Roberto Leonardo; Alberto Consolaro; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-09-05

5.  Diagnosis of invasive cervical resorption by using cone beam computed tomography: report of two cases.

Authors:  Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Yuri Nejaim; Francisco Haiter Neto; Frab Norberto Bóscolo
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2012

6.  Cone beam computed tomography in veterinary dentistry.

Authors:  Bert Van Thielen; Francis Siguenza; Bassam Hassan
Journal:  J Vet Dent       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.857

Review 7.  CBCT in orthodontics: the wave of future.

Authors:  Jiwanasha Manish Agrawal; Manish Suresh Agrawal; Lalita Girish Nanjannawar; Anita D Parushetti
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 8.  Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  Olivier J C van Vlijmen; Mette A R Kuijpers; Stefaan J Bergé; Jan G J H Schols; Thomas J J Maal; Hero Breuning; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 9.  Imaging of the canine and feline temporomandibular joint: a review.

Authors:  Tobias Schwarz; Renate Weller; Alison M Dickie; Martin Konar; Martin Sullivan
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.363

10.  Cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography for diagnosis of dental abnormalities in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Marcello R Roza; Luiz Antonio F Silva; Mauricio Barriviera; Alessandro L Januario; Ana Cristina B Bezerra; Maria Clorinda S Fioravanti
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.672

View more
  6 in total

1.  Localization of the First Mandibular Molar Roots in Relationship to the Mandibular Canal in Small Breed Dogs-A Tomography Imaging Study.

Authors:  Han Chia; Kendall Taney; Don Hoover; James B Robertson; Lenin A Villamizar-Martinez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Comparing Intraoral Radiography and Computed Tomography for Detecting Radiographic Signs of Periodontitis and Endodontic Disease in Dogs: An Agreement Study.

Authors:  Robert D Campbell; Santiago Peralta; Nadine Fiani; Peter V Scrivani
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-08-31

3.  Role of Computed Tomography Scan in Dental Trauma: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Feng Li; Jun Li; Deming Zhang; Feng Wu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  The Diagnostic Yield of Dental Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Identification of Dentoalveolar Lesions in Cats.

Authors:  Colleen M Heney; Boaz Arzi; Philip H Kass; David C Hatcher; Frank J M Verstraete
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-21

5.  Analysis of the Anatomic Relationship Between the Mandibular First Molar Roots and Mandibular Canal Using Cone-Beam Computed-Tomography in 101 Dogs.

Authors:  Jamie A Berning; Christopher J Snyder; Scott Hetzel; David P Sarment
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-01-17

6.  Patterns of local residual disease and local failure after intensity modulated/image guided radiation therapy for sinonasal tumors in dogs.

Authors:  Valerie J Poirier; Ethel S Y Koh; Johnson Darko; Andre Fleck; Christopher Pinard; David M Vail
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.