B Milan Horáček1, Linwei Wang2, Fady Dawoud3, Jingjia Xu2, John L Sapp3. 1. Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. Electronic address: milan.horacek@dal.ca. 2. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA. 3. Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) scar constitutes a substrate for ventricular tachycardia (VT), and an accurate delineation of infarct scar may help to identify reentrant circuits and thus facilitate catheter ablation. One of the recent advancements in characterization of a VT substrate is its volumetric delineation within the ventricular wall by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging. This paper compares, in four specific cases, epicardial and volumetric inverse solutions, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with late gadolinium enhancement as a gold standard. METHODS: For patients with chronic MI, who presented at Glasgow Western Infirmary, delayed-enhancement MRI and 120-lead body surface potential mapping (BSPM) data were acquired and 4 selected cases were later made available to a wider community as part of the 2007 PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge. These data were used to perform patient-specific inverse solutions for epicardial electrograms and morphology-based criteria were applied to delineate infarct scar on the epicardial surface. Later, the Rochester group analyzed the same data by means of a novel inverse solution for reconstructing intramural transmembrane potentials, to delineate infarct scar in three dimensions. Comparison of the performance of three specific inverse-solution algorithms is presented here, using scores based on the 17-segment ventricular division scheme recommended by the American Heart Association. RESULTS: The noninvasive methods delineating infarct scar as three-dimensional (3D) intramural distribution of transmembrane action potentials outperform estimates providing scar delineation on the epicardial surface in all scores used for comparison. In particular, the extent of infarct scar (its percentage mass relative to the total ventricular mass) is rendered more accurately by the 3D estimate. Moreover, the volumetric rendition of scar border provides better clues to potential targets for catheter ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic inverse solution providing transmural distribution of ventricular action potentials is a promising tool for noninvasively delineating the extent and location of chronic MI scar. Further validation on a larger data set with detailed gold-standard data is needed to confirm observations reported in this study.
BACKGROUND:Myocardial infarction (MI) scar constitutes a substrate for ventricular tachycardia (VT), and an accurate delineation of infarct scar may help to identify reentrant circuits and thus facilitate catheter ablation. One of the recent advancements in characterization of a VT substrate is its volumetric delineation within the ventricular wall by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging. This paper compares, in four specific cases, epicardial and volumetric inverse solutions, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with late gadolinium enhancement as a gold standard. METHODS: For patients with chronic MI, who presented at Glasgow Western Infirmary, delayed-enhancement MRI and 120-lead body surface potential mapping (BSPM) data were acquired and 4 selected cases were later made available to a wider community as part of the 2007 PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge. These data were used to perform patient-specific inverse solutions for epicardial electrograms and morphology-based criteria were applied to delineate infarct scar on the epicardial surface. Later, the Rochester group analyzed the same data by means of a novel inverse solution for reconstructing intramural transmembrane potentials, to delineate infarct scar in three dimensions. Comparison of the performance of three specific inverse-solution algorithms is presented here, using scores based on the 17-segment ventricular division scheme recommended by the American Heart Association. RESULTS: The noninvasive methods delineating infarct scar as three-dimensional (3D) intramural distribution of transmembrane action potentials outperform estimates providing scar delineation on the epicardial surface in all scores used for comparison. In particular, the extent of infarct scar (its percentage mass relative to the total ventricular mass) is rendered more accurately by the 3D estimate. Moreover, the volumetric rendition of scar border provides better clues to potential targets for catheter ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic inverse solution providing transmural distribution of ventricular action potentials is a promising tool for noninvasively delineating the extent and location of chronic MI scar. Further validation on a larger data set with detailed gold-standard data is needed to confirm observations reported in this study.
Authors: Thomas N Martin; Bjoern A Groenning; Heather M Murray; Tracey Steedman; John E Foster; Alex T Elliot; Henry J Dargie; Ronald H Selvester; Olle Pahlm; Galen S Wagner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: E Wu; J T Ortiz; P Tejedor; D C Lee; C Bucciarelli-Ducci; P Kansal; J C Carr; T A Holly; D Lloyd-Jones; F J Klocke; R O Bonow Journal: Heart Date: 2007-12-10 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Raymond J Kim; Timothy S E Albert; James H Wible; Michael D Elliott; John C Allen; Jennifer C Lee; Michele Parker; Alicia Napoli; Robert M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthijs Cluitmans; Dana H Brooks; Rob MacLeod; Olaf Dössel; María S Guillem; Peter M van Dam; Jana Svehlikova; Bin He; John Sapp; Linwei Wang; Laura Bear Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 4.566