Literature DB >> 26414481

Did the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act affect dietary intake of low-income individuals?

Geetha Waehrer1, Partha Deb2, Sandra L Decker3.   

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between increased Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits following the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the diet quality of individuals from SNAP-eligible compared to ineligible (those with somewhat higher income) households using data from the 2007-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The ARRA increased SNAP monthly benefits by 13.6% of the maximum allotment for a given household size, equivalent to an increase of $24 to $144 for one-to-eight person households respectively. In the full sample, we find that these increases in SNAP benefits are not associated with changes in nutrient intake and diet quality. However, among those with no more than a high school education, higher SNAP benefits are associated with a 46% increase in the mean caloric share from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and a decrease in overall diet quality especially for those at the lower end of the diet quality distribution, amounting to a 9% decline at the 25th percentile. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet quality; Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26414481      PMCID: PMC7362314          DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  38 in total

1.  Todd J.E., Mancino L., Lin B-H. The impact of food away from home on adult diet quality. ERR-90, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Serv., February 2010.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data.

Authors:  Willard G Manning; Anirban Basu; John Mullahy
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Food Stamps, the Thrifty Food Plan, and meal preparation: the importance of the time dimension for US nutrition policy.

Authors:  Donald Rose
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Less-energy-dense diets of low-income women in California are associated with higher energy-adjusted costs but not with higher daily diet costs.

Authors:  Elizabeth Frazao
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  A mixed-effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: the NCI method.

Authors:  Janet A Tooze; Victor Kipnis; Dennis W Buckman; Raymond J Carroll; Laurence S Freedman; Patricia M Guenther; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Kevin W Dodd
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010.

Authors:  Patricia M Guenther; Kellie O Casavale; Jill Reedy; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Hazel A B Hiza; Kevin J Kuczynski; Lisa L Kahle; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Lower Healthy Eating Index-2005 dietary quality scores in older women with rheumatoid arthritis v. healthy controls.

Authors:  Megan E Grimstvedt; Kathleen Woolf; Brandy-Joe Milliron; Melinda M Manore
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Disparities in food habits in Europe: systematic review of educational and occupational differences in the intake of fat.

Authors:  I López-Azpiazu; A Sánchez-Villegas; L Johansson; J Petkeviciene; R Prättälä; M A Martínez-González
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.089

9.  Dietary intake patterns and sociodemographic factors in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. ARIC Study Investigators.

Authors:  T Shimakawa; P Sorlie; M A Carpenter; B Dennis; G S Tell; R Watson; O D Williams
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods.

Authors:  A E Black; T J Cole
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Environmental Interventions to Reduce the Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Abridged Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva A Rehfuess
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Food insecurity and dietary intake by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation status among mainland US Puerto Rican adults after the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Authors:  Amanda C McClain; Katherine L Tucker; Luis M Falcón; Josiemer Mattei
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Supplemental nutrition assistance program 2009 expansion and cardiometabolic markers among low-income adults.

Authors:  Laura J Samuel; Sarah L Szanton; Jennifer L Wolff; Darrell J Gaskin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 4.637

4.  Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.

Authors:  Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 5.  Associations between Governmental Policies to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Purchases and Individual, Retailer, and Community Health Outcomes: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Alyssa J Moran; Yuxuan Gu; Sasha Clynes; Attia Goheer; Christina A Roberto; Anne Palmer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.