BACKGROUND: About a third of children with HIV have virological failure within 2 years of beginning antiretroviral treatment (ART). We assessed the probability of switch to second-line ART or virological re-suppression without switch in children who had virological rebound on first-line ART in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: In this study, we used data reported to the Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study (CHIPS), a national multicentre observational cohort. We included children with virological rebound (confirmed viral load>400 copies per mL after suppression<400 copies per mL) on first-line ART. We did a competing-risk analysis to estimate the probability of switch to second-line treatment, confirmed resuppression (two consecutive viral load measurments<400 copies per mL) without switch, and continued viral load above 400 copies per mL without switch. We also assessed factors that predicted a faster time to switch. FINDINGS: Of the 900 children starting first-line ART who had a viral load below 400 copies per mL within a year of starting treatment, 170 (19%) had virological rebound by a median of 20·6 months (IQR 9·7–40·5). At rebound, median age was 10·6 years (5·6–13·4), median viral load was 3·6 log10 copies per mL (3·1–4·2), and median CD4% was 24% (17–32). 89 patients (52%) switched to second-line ART at a median of 4·9 months (1·7–13·4) after virological rebound, 53 (31%) resuppressed without switch (19 [61%] of 31 patients on a first-line regimen that included a protease inhibitor and 31 [24%] of 127 patients on a first-line regimen that included a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI), and 28 (16%) neither resuppressed nor switched. At 12 months after rebound, the estimated probability of switch was 38% (95% CI 30–45) and of resuppression was 27% (21–34). Faster time to switch was associated with a higher viral load (p<0·0001), later calendar year at virological rebound (p=0·02), and being on an NNRTI-based or triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based versus protease-inhibitor-based first-line regimen (p=0·001). INTERPRETATION: A third of children with virological rebound resuppressed without switch. Clinicians should consider the possibility of resuppression with adherence support before switching treatment in children with HIV. FUNDING: NHS England (London Specialised Commissioning Group).
BACKGROUND: About a third of children with HIV have virological failure within 2 years of beginning antiretroviral treatment (ART). We assessed the probability of switch to second-line ART or virological re-suppression without switch in children who had virological rebound on first-line ART in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: In this study, we used data reported to the Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study (CHIPS), a national multicentre observational cohort. We included children with virological rebound (confirmed viral load>400 copies per mL after suppression<400 copies per mL) on first-line ART. We did a competing-risk analysis to estimate the probability of switch to second-line treatment, confirmed resuppression (two consecutive viral load measurments<400 copies per mL) without switch, and continued viral load above 400 copies per mL without switch. We also assessed factors that predicted a faster time to switch. FINDINGS: Of the 900 children starting first-line ART who had a viral load below 400 copies per mL within a year of starting treatment, 170 (19%) had virological rebound by a median of 20·6 months (IQR 9·7–40·5). At rebound, median age was 10·6 years (5·6–13·4), median viral load was 3·6 log10 copies per mL (3·1–4·2), and median CD4% was 24% (17–32). 89 patients (52%) switched to second-line ART at a median of 4·9 months (1·7–13·4) after virological rebound, 53 (31%) resuppressed without switch (19 [61%] of 31 patients on a first-line regimen that included a protease inhibitor and 31 [24%] of 127 patients on a first-line regimen that included a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI), and 28 (16%) neither resuppressed nor switched. At 12 months after rebound, the estimated probability of switch was 38% (95% CI 30–45) and of resuppression was 27% (21–34). Faster time to switch was associated with a higher viral load (p<0·0001), later calendar year at virological rebound (p=0·02), and being on an NNRTI-based or triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based versus protease-inhibitor-based first-line regimen (p=0·001). INTERPRETATION: A third of children with virological rebound resuppressed without switch. Clinicians should consider the possibility of resuppression with adherence support before switching treatment in children with HIV. FUNDING: NHS England (London Specialised Commissioning Group).
Authors: Katherine J Lee; David Dunn; Richard Gilson; Kholoud Porter; Loveleen Bansi; Teresa Hill; Andrew N Phillips; Caroline A Sabin; Achim Schwenk; Clifford Leen; Valerie Delpech; Jane Anderson; Brian Gazzard; Margaret Johnson; Philippa Easterbrook; John Walsh; Martin Fisher; Chloe Orkin Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Yu Zheng; Michael D Hughes; Shahin Lockman; Constance A Benson; Mina C Hosseinipour; Thomas B Campbell; Roy M Gulick; Eric S Daar; Paul E Sax; Sharon A Riddler; Richard Haubrich; Robert A Salata; Judith S Currier Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: D M Gibb; T Duong; P A Tookey; M Sharland; G Tudor-Williams; V Novelli; K Butler; A Riordan; L Farrelly; J Masters; C S Peckham; D T Dunn Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-11-01
Authors: Moses R Kamya; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Andrew Kambugu; Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka; Fred Semitala; Patricia Mwebaze-Songa; Barbara Castelnuovo; Petra Schaefer; Lisa A Spacek; Anne F Gasasira; Elly Katabira; Robert Colebunders; Thomas C Quinn; Allan Ronald; David L Thomas; Adeodata Kekitiinwa Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Victor Musiime; Elizabeth Kaudha; Joshua Kayiwa; Grace Mirembe; Matthew Odera; Hilda Kizito; Immaculate Nankya; Francis Ssali; Cissy Kityo; Robert Colebunders; Peter Mugyenyi Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Mark F Cotton; Avy Violari; Kennedy Otwombe; Ravindre Panchia; Els Dobbels; Helena Rabie; Deirdre Josipovic; Afaaf Liberty; Erica Lazarus; Steve Innes; Anita Janse van Rensburg; Wilma Pelser; Handre Truter; Shabir A Madhi; Edward Handelsman; Patrick Jean-Philippe; James A McIntyre; Diana M Gibb; Abdel G Babiker Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patricia Rojas Sánchez; Luis Prieto; Santiago Jiménez De Ory; Elisa Fernández Cooke; Maria Luisa Navarro; José Tomas Ramos; África Holguín Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew J Prendergast; Alexander J Szubert; Godfrey Pimundu; Chipo Berejena; Pietro Pala; Annie Shonhai; Patricia Hunter; Francesca I F Arrigoni; Victor Musiime; Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Philippa Musoke; Hannah Poulsom; Macklyn Kihembo; Paula Munderi; Diana M Gibb; Moira J Spyer; A Sarah Walker; Nigel Klein Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 4.177