| Literature DB >> 26413464 |
Iva Bozic1, Danijela Savic1, Marija Jovanovic1, Ivana Bjelobaba1, Danijela Laketa2, Nadezda Nedeljkovic2, Mirjana Stojiljkovic1, Sanja Pekovic1, Irena Lavrnja1.
Abstract
Microglia play a key role in defending central nervous system from various internal and external threats. However, their excessive and/or chronic activation is associated with deleterious effects in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases. Previously, we have shown that ribavirin when applied in clinically relevant dosage (10 μM) modulates activated microglia in complex fashion inducing both anti- and proinflammatory effects, simultaneously causing cytotoxicity. Here, we examined potential of low-dose ribavirin (0.1 and 1 μM) to modulate activated BV-2 microglia. Morphological and functional activation of BV-2 cells was achieved with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. Our results demonstrated that low-dose ribavirin did not induce cell death, while 10 μM ribavirin promoted LPS induced apoptosis. We determined that 1 μM ribavirin was equally efficient in deactivation of LPS induced morphological changes as 10 μM ribavirin treatment. Ribavirin showed halfway success in reducing markers of functional activation of microglia. Namely, none of the doses had effect on LPS triggered production of proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha. On the other hand, low-dose ribavirin proved its effectiveness in reduction of another inflammatory mediator, nitric oxide, by inhibiting inducible form of nitric oxide synthase. Our results imply that low-dose ribavirin may alleviate nitrosative stress during neuroinflammation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26413464 PMCID: PMC4564589 DOI: 10.1155/2015/923614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) ISSN: 2210-7177 Impact factor: 2.916
Figure 1Annexin V/PI staining was analyzed with FACS after 24 h of RBV treatment and LPS stimulation. Representative dot plots are shown for control (a), LPS (b), and LPS stimulated BV-2 cells treated with 0.1 μM (c), 1 μM (d), and 10 μM RBV (e). (f) Histogram representing percentage of live, early apoptotic, and dead cells after RBV pretreatment and LPS stimulation. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent cell preparations. P < 0.05 versus control group, # P < 0.05 versus LPS stimulated group.
Figure 2Morphology of BV-2 cells upon 24 h of LPS stimulation and RBV treatment. Phalloidin/Hoechst fluorescent staining (red/blue) of control (a), LPS (b), and LPS stimulated BV-2 cells treated with 0.1 (c), 1 (d), and 10 μM RBV (e). (f) Cell surface area was measured using AxioVision Rel. 4.6 software, in five areas (138 × 104 μm2) per each coverslip (n = 3) per experimental group in three independent experiments. Bars represent mean surface areas (±SEM) obtained from data presented in (a)–(e). P < 0.05 versus control group, # P < 0.05 versus LPS stimulated group. Scale bar (a)–(e): 50 μm.
Release of TNF-α from activated BV-2 cells treated with RBV.
| Groups | C | LPS | LPS + 0.1 | LPS + 1 | LPS + 10 |
|
| |||||
| TNF- | 50 ± 23 | 2110 ± 95 | 2114 ± 59 | 2361 ± 84 | 2157 ± 175 |
P < 0.05 versus control group (C).
Figure 3(a) Effect of RBV on LPS triggered production of NO. (b) Representative Western blot of iNOS expression. Graph shows mean iNOS protein abundance (± SEM), from n = 3 separate determinations, expressed relative to the abundance of β-actin in each lane. Significance inside the graphs (a) and (b): P < 0.05 versus control group, # P < 0.05 versus LPS stimulated group. (c) Panel of immunofluorescence labeling of BV-2 cells against iNOS (green) and counterstained with Hoechst (blue) after 24 h of stimulation with LPS and treatment with RBV. Scale bar for all pictures in panel (c): 50 μm.