Literature DB >> 26413197

The complete genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanosarcina barkeri CM1.

Suzanne C Lambie1, William J Kelly1, Sinead C Leahy2, Dong Li1, Kerri Reilly1, Tim A McAllister3, Edith R Valle3, Graeme T Attwood2, Eric Altermann4.   

Abstract

Methanosarcina species are the most metabolically versatile of the methanogenic Archaea and can obtain energy for growth by producing methane via the hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic or methylotrophic pathways. Methanosarcina barkeri CM1 was isolated from the rumen of a New Zealand Friesian cow grazing a ryegrass/clover pasture, and its genome has been sequenced to provide information on the phylogenetic diversity of rumen methanogens with a view to developing technologies for methane mitigation. The 4.5 Mb chromosome has an average G + C content of 39 %, and encodes 3523 protein-coding genes, but has no plasmid or prophage sequences. The gene content is very similar to that of M. barkeri Fusaro which was isolated from freshwater sediment. CM1 has a full complement of genes for all three methanogenesis pathways, but its genome shows many differences from those of other sequenced rumen methanogens. Consequently strategies to mitigate ruminant methane need to include information on the different methanogens that occur in the rumen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methane; Methanogen; Methanosarcina barkeri; Ruminant

Year:  2015        PMID: 26413197      PMCID: PMC4582637          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0038-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Ruminants are foregut fermenters and have evolved an efficient digestive system in which microbes ferment plant fibre and provide fermentation end-products and other nutrients for growth of the animal [1]. A variety of methanogens can be found in the rumen [2] and ruminant derived methane (CH4) accounts for about one quarter of all anthropogenic CH4 emissions [3], and is implicated as a driver of global climate change. In terms of their metabolism the rumen methanogens fall into three groups, hydrogenotrophs (, and spp) which convert hydrogen and/or formate to CH4, methylotrophs ( spp and members of the order ) which produce CH4 from methyl compounds such as methanol and methylamines, and acetoclastic methanogens () which can utilise acetate to produce CH4 in addition to the hydrogenotrophic and methylotrophic pathways. Obtaining representative genome sequences from each of the above organisms will be important to understanding the metabolic capacity of these archaea and how they contribute to rumen fermentation processes. Currently, genome sequences are available for five rumen methanogens including strains of [4], [5, 6], [7] and archaeon BRNA1 [NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_020892.1]. Development of strategies to reduce CH4 emissions from farmed ruminant animals are currently being investigated with methanogen genome sequence information used to inform mitigation strategies based on vaccines and small-molecule inhibitors [8, 9]. Here we present the genome sequence from a rumen acetoclastic methanogen, CM1.

Organism information

Classification and features

sp. CM1 was isolated from the rumen of a New Zealand Friesian cow grazing a ryegrass/clover pasture [10]. CM1 grew as large cell aggregates in broth culture and showed the characteristic morphology associated with [11] (Fig. 1). It was described as non-motile, and able to grow and produce methane from H2/CO2, acetate, methanol and methylamines. Growth occurred between 30° and 45 °C, and at pH 5.0 to 7.4. Rumen fluid was required for growth. The 16S rRNA gene from CM1 is 99 % similar to that of the type strain MS (DSM 800) (Fig. 2) which was isolated from a sewage sludge digester [12, 13], and as such CM1 can be considered as a strain of . is found at high densities in anaerobic digesters and anoxic marine and freshwater sediments, but there have been several reports describing from the rumen although these organisms were not characterized [14, 15]. In addition, non-rumen strains of have been used in co-culture studies with rumen anaerobic fungi [16] and ciliate protozoa [17, 18]. Characteristics of CM1 are shown in Table 1 and Additional file 1.
Fig. 1

Morphology of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1. Micrograph showing aggregates of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1 cells captured with sectional depth scanning using an Olympus Fluoview FV1000D Spectral laser confocal scanning inverted microscope, with an UPLSAPO 60X oil objective (1.35 NA). Olympus Fluoview 10-ASW software was used to view fluorescent signals and to generate images. Emission at 635 nm wavelength shows methyl green stain incorporated into nucleic acids within cells and cell clusters. Bar is 10 μm

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the position of CM1 relative to type strains of other Methanosarcina species. The strains and their corresponding accession numbers are shown. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [45] with Methanobrevibacter ruminantium used as an outgroup. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.43777587 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [46]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [47] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis involved 13 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 1081 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 [48]

Table 1

Classification and general features of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain: ArchaeaTAS [49]
Phylum: Euryarchaeota TAS [50]
Class: Methanococci TAS [51, 52]
Order: Methanosarcinales TAS [51, 53]
Family: Methanosarcinaceae TAS [24, 54]
Genus: Methanosarcina TAS [55, 56]
Species: Methanosarcina barkeri TAS [10]
strain: CM1
Gram stainPositiveTAS [12]
Cell shapeIrregularTAS [10]
MotilityNon-motileTAS [10]
SporulationNot reportedIDA
Temperature range30-45 °CTAS [10]
Optimum temperature40 °CTAS [10]
pH range; Optimum5.0-7.4; 6.8TAS [10]
Carbon sourceCO2, AcetateIDA
MIGS-6HabitatBovine rumenTAS [10]
MIGS-6.3SalinityNot reported
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAnaerobicIDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipSymbiontTAS [10]
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationPalmerston North, New ZealandIDA
MIGS-5Sample collectionNot reported
MIGS-4.1Latitude-40.35 (40°21'00"S)IDA
MIGS-4.2Longitude+175.61 (175°36'36"E)IDA
MIGS-4.4Altitude30 MIDA

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [57]

Morphology of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1. Micrograph showing aggregates of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1 cells captured with sectional depth scanning using an Olympus Fluoview FV1000D Spectral laser confocal scanning inverted microscope, with an UPLSAPO 60X oil objective (1.35 NA). Olympus Fluoview 10-ASW software was used to view fluorescent signals and to generate images. Emission at 635 nm wavelength shows methyl green stain incorporated into nucleic acids within cells and cell clusters. Bar is 10 μm Phylogenetic tree showing the position of CM1 relative to type strains of other Methanosarcina species. The strains and their corresponding accession numbers are shown. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [45] with Methanobrevibacter ruminantium used as an outgroup. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.43777587 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [46]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [47] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis involved 13 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 1081 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 [48] Classification and general features of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1 aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [57]

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

CM1 was selected for genome sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position relative to other methanogens isolated from the rumen. A summary of the genome project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityHigh-quality, closed genome
MIGS-28Libraries used454 3 kb mate paired-end library, Illumina paired-end 170 bp insert library
MIGS-29Sequencing platforms454 GS FLX Titanium chemistry, Illumina
MIGS-31.2Fold coverage97× (454), 224× (Illumina)
MIGS-30AssemblersNewbler, Spades
MIGS-32Gene calling methodGlimmer and BLASTX
Locus tagMCM1
Genbank IDCP008746
Genbank date of releaseJune 3, 2015
GOLD IDGp0007672
MIGS 13Source material identifierCM1
Project relevanceRuminant methane emissions
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

CM1 was grown in BY medium [19] with added SL10 Trace Elements solution (1 ml added l−1 [20], 20 mM sodium acetate, 60 mM sodium formate and Vitamin 10 solution (0.1 ml added to 10 ml culture before inoculation) [4]. H2 was supplied as the energy source by pumping the culture vessels to 180 kPa over pressure with an 80:20 mixture of H2:CO2. Genomic DNA was extracted from freshly grown cells using a modified version of a liquid N2 and grinding method as described previously [6].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The complete genome sequence of CM1 was determined using pyrosequencing of 3Kb mate paired-end sequence libraries using a 454 GS FLX platform with Titanium chemistry (Macrogen, Korea). Pyrosequencing reads provided 97× coverage of the genome and were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.7 (Roche 454 Life Sciences, USA). The Newbler assembly resulted in 85 contigs across 9 scaffolds. Gap closure was managed using the Staden package [21] and gaps were closed using additional Sanger sequencing by standard and inverse PCR based techniques. In addition, CM1 genomic DNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Beijing Genomics Institute, China) which provided 223× genome coverage. Illumina reads were assembled using the Spades assembler version 3.0 [22] and combined with the Newbler assembly using the Staden package. Assembly validation was confirmed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as described previously [6].

Genome annotation

The procedure for genome annotation was as described previously for sp. [4, 6], and the CM1 genome sequence was prepared for NCBI submission using Sequin. The adenine residue of the start codon of the Cdc6-1 replication initiation protein A (MCM1_0001) gene was chosen as the first base for the CM1 genome. The nucleotide sequence of the CM1 chromosome has been deposited in Genbank under accession number CP008746.

Genome properties

The genome of CM1 consists of a single 4,501,171 basepair (bp) circular chromosome with an average G + C content of 39 %. A total of 3656 genes were predicted, 3523 of which were protein-coding genes, representing 70 % of the total genome sequence. A COG category was assigned to 2267 of the protein-coding genes. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. As with the other sequenced strains CM1 has dual origins of replication (MCM1_001 and MCM1_3593, 95 kb apart) surrounded by conserved genes [23]. The CM1 genome has neither plasmid nor prophage sequences, but does contain three clusters of CRISPR genes associated with CRISPR repeat regions, and three type I restriction/modification systems.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)4,501,171100.00
DNA coding (bp)3,149,91969.98
DNA G + C (bp)1,763,74039.18
DNA scaffolds1
Total genes3,655100.00
Protein coding genes3,52396.39
RNA genes691.89
Pseudo genes631.72
Genes with function prediction2,41065.94
Genes assigned to COGs2,26764.35
Genes with Pfam domains2,95380.79
Genes with signal peptides35810.16
Genes with transmembrane helices88125.01
CRISPR repeats3
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

CodeValue% of totala Description
J1584.48Translation
A10.03RNA processing and modification
K1123.18Transcription
L1263.58Replication, recombination and repair
B20.06Chromatin structure and dynamics
D150.43Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y--Nuclear structure
V762.16Defense mechanisms
T631.79Signal transduction mechanisms
M992.81Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N160.45Cell motility
Z--Cytoskeleton
W--Extracellular structures
U180.51Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O962.72Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2236.33Energy production and conversion
G812.30Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2216.27Amino acid transport and metabolism
F541.53Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1093.09Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I300.85Lipid transport and metabolism
P1383.92Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q481.36Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R36810.44General function prediction only
S2136.04Function unknown
-125635.67Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Genome statistics Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the genome sequence

The genome of CM1 is compared with genomes of other sequenced methanogens from the genus in Table 5. Overall, the gene content of the CM1 genome is very similar to that of Fusaro, but gene organization shows very little synteny.
Table 5

Genomes of Methanosarcina species from various anaerobic environments

SpeciesIsolation sourceGenome size (Mb)Accession #CDS% GCReference
Methanosarcina barkeri CM1Bovine rumen4.50CP0087463,52439.2This report
Methanosarcina barkeri FusaroFreshwater sediment4.87NC_0073553,75839.2[23]
Methanosarcina acetivorans C2AMarine sediment5.75AE0102994,72142.7[32]
Methanosarcina mazei Go1Sewage4.10AE0083843,39841.5[58]
Methanosarcina mazei Tuc01Freshwater sediment3.42CP0041443,39542.5[59]
Genomes of Methanosarcina species from various anaerobic environments

Methanogenesis

species are the most metabolically versatile of the methanogenic archaea [24] and can obtain energy for growth by producing methane via three different pathways (Fig. 3). Methane can be derived from the reduction of CO2 with hydrogen (hydrogenotrophic pathway), from the methyl group of acetate (acetoclastic pathway), or from the methyl group of methanol, methylamines or methylthiols (methylotrophic pathway). Each pathway culminates in the transfer of a methyl group to coenzyme M and the subsequent reduction to methane. The bioenergetics of aceticlastic methanogens have been recently reviewed [25, 26], and a metabolic reconstruction presented for Fusaro [27]. There is evidence that the genes essential to both the acetoclastic and methyoltrophic pathways were horizontally acquired during evolution of the [28-30]. Although acetoclastic methanogenesis contributes approximately two-thirds of the methane in the biosphere [31], acetate is not metabolized to methane to any significant extent in the rumen [2]. CM1 has a full complement of genes for all three methanogenesis pathways and as with other species several genes are present as multiple copies [32]. Unlike many hydrogenotrophic methanogens, CM1 does not have the gene for [Fe]-hydrogenase dehydrogenase (hmd), or the genes that encode methyl coenzyme M reductase II (mrt), however it does have genes for formate dehydrogenase (MCM1_3047-3048) although CM1 and other strains are unable to use formate [10, 23]. The pathway for coenzyme M biosynthesis differs from that found in other sequenced rumen methanogens which belong to the order [33]. Consequently methanogen inhibitors targeting coenzyme M biosynthesis would not be expected to work against all rumen methanogen species. is the organism in which the 22nd amino acid (pyrrolysine) was discovered during examination of the methyltransferases required for methane formation from methylamines [34]. Biosynthesis of this amino acid requires specialized enzymes together with a specific aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase [35], and the genes encoding these (pylSBCD) are found in CM1 (MCM1_2535-2538).
Fig. 3

The three methanogenesis pathways inferred from the genome of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1

The three methanogenesis pathways inferred from the genome of Methanosarcina barkeri CM1

Cell envelope

The majority of rumen methanogens belong to the family and have a characteristic pseudomurein-containing cell wall [4]. The cell surface of sp. is different and electron microscopy shows a protein S-layer surrounding the cytoplasmic membrane. A major S-layer protein has been identified in three species and used to define a family of proteins [36, 37]. All paralogs possess signal peptides and one or two DUF1608 (Pfam accession PF07752) domains. Both Fusaro and CM1 possess nine proteins containing this domain. Gene expression studies show that a single DUF1608 domain-containing protein is abundantly expressed in both (MA0829) and (Mbar_A1758), and is among the most highly expressed of all proteins in the cell [37]. A similar protein is predicted from the CM1 genome (MCM1_2018, 84 % amino acid identity to the product of Mbar_A1758), and likely to be the major S-layer protein for this strain. The DUF1608 domain from MA0829 has been crystallised and was used to propose an elegant model of the S-layer structure [38]. cells can form large aggregates (Fig. 1) mediated by the production of methanochondroitin, a polymer composed of uronic acid and N-acetylgalactosamine residues [39]. While the steps in methanochondroitin biosynthesis have been determined, the genes involved have yet to be identified. These aggregates are observed to separate into single cells and CM1 encodes eleven proteins with disaggregatase-related domains (Pfam accession PF08480). The CM1 genome has four oligosaccharyl transferase genes, three of which (MCM1_1841-1843) are at the end of a large gene cluster that contains 14 glycosyl transferases and is likely to be involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis (MCM1_1841-1889). The fourth oligosaccharyl transferase is associated with a smaller gene cluster containing glycosyl transferases, methyltransferases and transporters (MCM1_2113-2123). A third cluster of polysaccharide biosynthesis genes is found at MCM1_2831-2857. CM1 also encodes a secreted protein (MCM_2974) containing a glycoside hydrolase family 18 (chitinase) domain that is not found in Fusaro which may be involved in mediating interaction with rumen anaerobic fungi. Like many other archaea, CM1 has an identifiable archaella (archaeal flagella) operon (FlaB-FlaJ, MCM1_1947-1953), together with a cluster of chemotaxis genes (MCM1_3655-3662) [40, 41]. However, motility has never been observed in any species and thus the function of these genes remains unknown. has been reported to fix nitrogen [42] and sets of nitrogenase genes are found in genomes. CM1 contains two different nif operons comprising nitrogenase and nitrogenase cofactor biosynthesis genes that match to those reported from strain 227 [43]. These are a molybdenum- and iron-containing nitrogenase (MCM1_2924-2930) and a vanadium- and iron-containing nitrogenase (MCM1_1063-1072). However, it does not have the genes for the third type, the iron-only nitrogenase that is found in and Fusaro. Electron micrographs of log phase cells [11] show the presence of numerous electron-dense granules in the cytoplasm. In similar granules were found to contain glycogen [44], and CM1 has several genes predicted to encode the enzymes necessary for the biosynthesis and degradation of this reserve polysaccharide. CM1 does not have the genes for gas vesicle biosynthesis that are found in the Fusaro genome [23], but it does have genes for the two-subunit acetyl-CoA synthetase (MCM1_1658 and 2708) that have been lost from the Fusaro strain.

Conclusion

The genome of CM1 is very similar to that of the freshwater sediment isolate Fusaro, but markedly different from the dominant rumen methanogens, most of which are members of the family . CM1 has a much larger genome and its sequence provides new insights into the metabolic versatility of rumen methanogens. With its ability to use three different methanogenesis pathways, appears to be a generalist able to occupy a range of different environments but is not particularly at home in the rumen. This is in contrast to the more specialised rumen methanogens, such as the species which dominate the rumen environment. Analysis of the methanogenesis pathway and the cell envelope have been important for the design of methane mitigation strategies targeting rumen methanogens, but differences highlighted from the CM1 genome stress the need to include information from all rumen methanogens in the design of mitigation approaches.
  44 in total

1.  The Staden package, 1998.

Authors:  R Staden; K F Beal; J K Bonfield
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The Methanosarcina barkeri genome: comparative analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensive rearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes.

Authors:  Dennis L Maeder; Iain Anderson; Thomas S Brettin; David C Bruce; Paul Gilna; Cliff S Han; Alla Lapidus; William W Metcalf; Elizabeth Saunders; Roxanne Tapia; Kevin R Sowers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Pyrrolysine encoded by UAG in Archaea: charging of a UAG-decoding specialized tRNA.

Authors:  Gayathri Srinivasan; Carey M James; Joseph A Krzycki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genomically and biochemically accurate metabolic reconstruction of Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro, iMG746.

Authors:  Matthew C Gonnerman; Matthew N Benedict; Adam M Feist; William W Metcalf; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions.

Authors:  Sinead C Leahy; William J Kelly; Eric Altermann; Ron S Ronimus; Carl J Yeoman; Diana M Pacheco; Dong Li; Zhanhao Kong; Sharla McTavish; Carrie Sang; Suzanne C Lambie; Peter H Janssen; Debjit Dey; Graeme T Attwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Complete Genome Sequence of Methanobrevibacter sp. AbM4.

Authors:  S C Leahy; W J Kelly; D Li; Y Li; E Altermann; S C Lambie; F Cox; G T Attwood
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-25

10.  Phylogenomics of the archaeal flagellum: rare horizontal gene transfer in a unique motility structure.

Authors:  Elie Desmond; Celine Brochier-Armanet; Simonetta Gribaldo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  9 in total

1.  GAMOLA2, a Comprehensive Software Package for the Annotation and Curation of Draft and Complete Microbial Genomes.

Authors:  Eric Altermann; Jingli Lu; Alan McCulloch
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Satellites in the prokaryote world.

Authors:  Juan A Subirana; Xavier Messeguer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Diverse hydrogen production and consumption pathways influence methane production in ruminants.

Authors:  Chris Greening; Renae Geier; Cecilia Wang; Laura C Woods; Sergio E Morales; Michael J McDonald; Rowena Rushton-Green; Xochitl C Morgan; Satoshi Koike; Sinead C Leahy; William J Kelly; Isaac Cann; Graeme T Attwood; Gregory M Cook; Roderick I Mackie
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 11.217

4.  Enhanced Microbial Interactions and Deterministic Successions During Anoxic Decomposition of Microcystis Biomass in Lake Sediment.

Authors:  Yu-Fan Wu; Peng Xing; Shuangjiang Liu; Qinglong L Wu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Biogas Production Systems and Upgrading Technologies: A Review.

Authors:  Martina Andlar; Halina Belskaya; Galina Morzak; Mirela Ivančić Šantek; Tonči Rezić; Vlatka Petravić Tominac; Božidar Šantek
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  The Remodeling Effects of High-Concentrate Diets on Microbial Composition and Function in the Hindgut of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Ruiyang Zhang; Junhua Liu; Linshu Jiang; Xinfeng Wang; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Plane of nutrition affects the phylogenetic diversity and relative abundance of transcriptionally active methanogens in the bovine rumen.

Authors:  Emily McGovern; Matthew S McCabe; Paul Cormican; Milka Popova; Kate Keogh; Alan K Kelly; David A Kenny; Sinead M Waters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Inhibition of Rumen Methanogens by a Novel Archaeal Lytic Enzyme Displayed on Tailored Bionanoparticles.

Authors:  Eric Altermann; Linley R Schofield; Ron S Ronimus; Amy K Beatty; Kerri Reilly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  16S rRNA Sequencing Reveals Relationship Between Potent Cellulolytic Genera and Feed Efficiency in the Rumen of Bulls.

Authors:  Emily McGovern; David A Kenny; Matthew S McCabe; Claire Fitzsimons; Mark McGee; Alan K Kelly; Sinéad M Waters
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.