Literature DB >> 22358015

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.

Maki Hirano1, Hiroko Satake, Satoko Ishigaki, Mitsuru Ikeda, Hisashi Kawai, Shinji Naganawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the utility of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), average ADC, maximum ADC, and ADC difference value and to find optimum ADC parameters for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven women with 75 masslike lesions (27 benign, 48 malignant) were examined with 3-T MRI. To assess heterogeneity within the lesion, the difference between minimum and maximum ADCs was recorded as the ADC difference value. Diagnostic performances of these parameters were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: Each ADC parameter showed significant differences between malignant and benign lesions. The optimal cutoff levels for differentiating benign versus malignant lesions were determined by identifying the points where the sensitivity and specificity were equal on the ROC curves. According to ROC analyses, the following sensitivities and specificities were obtained: average ADC, 75.6% and 75.6%; minimum ADC, 85.5% and 85.5%; maximum ADC, 63.5% and 63.5%; ADC difference value, 70.1% and 70.1%. Minimum ADC had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.93. Minimum ADC combined with the ADC difference value improved the AUC to 0.95, with sensitivity and specificity of 89.1% and 89.1%.
CONCLUSION: Minimum ADC may be an optimal DWI single parameter for differentiation between malignant and benign lesions of breast masses. Furthermore, the combination of the minimum ADC and ADC difference value significantly elevated diagnostic performance of breast DWI in comparison with average ADC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22358015     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  40 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guan-Qiao Jin; Jun-Jie Liu; Dan-Ke Su; Ning-Bin Luo; Dong Xie; Shao-Lv Lai; Xiang-Yang Huang; Wei-Li Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Hideki Ota; Shunji Mugikura; Chiaki Takasawa; Junya Tominaga; Takanori Ishida; Mika Watanabe; Kei Takase; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.

Authors:  Luísa Nogueira; Sofia Brandão; Eduarda Matos; Rita Gouveia Nunes; Hugo Alexandre Ferreira; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Correlation between minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values and the histological grade of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Suhong Zhao; Weihua Guo; Ru Tan; Peipei Chen; Zhaohua Li; Fengguo Sun; Guangrui Shao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: the influence of different fat-suppression techniques on quantitative measurements and their reproducibility.

Authors:  P Mürtz; M Tsesarskiy; A Kowal; F Träber; J Gieseke; W A Willinek; C C Leutner; A Schmiedel; H H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level.

Authors:  Hong-Li Liu; Min Zong; Han Wei; Jian-Juan Lou; Si-Qi Wang; Qi-Gui Zou; Hai-Bin Shi; Yan-Ni Jiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Hubert Bickel; Katja Pinker; Stephan Polanec; Heinrich Magometschnigg; Georg Wengert; Claudio Spick; Wolfgang Bogner; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Utility of Diffusion-weighted Imaging to Decrease Unnecessary Biopsies Prompted by Breast MRI: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (A6702).

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Zheng Zhang; Thomas L Chenevert; Justin Romanoff; Averi E Kitsch; Lucy G Hanna; Sara M Harvey; Linda Moy; Wendy B DeMartini; Basak Dogan; Wei T Yang; Lilian C Wang; Bonnie N Joe; Karen Y Oh; Colleen H Neal; Elizabeth S McDonald; Mitchell D Schnall; Constance D Lehman; Christopher E Comstock; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Jin You Kim; Jin Joo Kim; Ji Won Lee; Nam Kyung Lee; Geewon Lee; Taewoo Kang; Heesung Park; Yo Han Son; Robert Grimm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the initial characterization of non-fatty soft tissue tumors: correlation between T2 signal intensity and ADC values.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Frederique Gay; Bailiang Chen; Marie Zins; François Sirveaux; Jacques Felblinger; Alain Blum
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.