Literature DB >> 26412434

Urgent carotid intervention is safe after thrombolysis for minor to moderate acute ischemic stroke.

Hernan A Bazan1, Nicolas Zea2, Bethany Jennings3, Taylor A Smith2, Gabriel Vidal3, W Charles Sternbergh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Carotid intervention shortly after an acute neurologic ischemic event is being performed more frequently in stroke centers to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is offered to select patients with ischemic stroke symptoms who present within 4.5 hours. However, there is a paucity of data as to whether tPA followed by urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) has an increased risk of complications, particularly intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to determine the periprocedural complications of urgently performed CEA or CAS following tPA.
METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2015, 762 patients underwent carotid interventions (CEA, n = 440; CAS, n = 322) at a tertiary referral center and 165 patients (21.6%) underwent an urgent CEA or CAS during the index hospitalization for an acute transient ischemic attack or stroke. We compared the effect of intravenous tPA on 30-day complications, including ICH. The χ(2) and Fisher exact tests were used to determine significance between groups.
RESULTS: During the 6-year period, 165 patients underwent urgent carotid interventions (CEA, n = 135; CAS, n = 30) for acute neurologic symptoms. Of these, 19% (31 patients [CEA, n = 25; CAS, n = 6]) had tPA for an acute stroke; the remaining (134 patients [CEA, n = 110; CAS, n = 24]) fell outside of the tPA time window. Most strokes were minor or moderate with a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 6.6 (range, 0-19). The mean time to intervention for both groups was 2.4 days (0-15 days). The 30-day stroke, death, and myocardial infarction rates were 9.7% (3 of 31) for the tPA group compared with 4.5% (6 of 134) for the no-tPA group (P = .37). Including bleeding complications in these 30-day outcomes, there was no difference between the tPA (3 of 31) and the no-tPA cohorts (8 of 134; P = .43). In the tPA group, there were one ICH, one neck hematoma/death, and an additional death; in the no-tPA group, there were one ICH, two neck hematomas, one stroke, two myocardial infarctions, one ICH/death, and one additional death. No significant increased rates of bleeding were noted within the tPA group (2 of 31) compared with the no-tPA group (4 of 134; P = .32). Moreover, in the tPA cohort, more than half of the patients (17 of 31) underwent revascularization within 72 hours (CEA = 13; CAS = 4) with outcomes similar to those who underwent revascularization after 72 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis followed by urgent CEA or CAS is not associated with an increased risk of complications in select patients who present with acute neurologic symptoms. Selection of patients is important; there was no ICH and only one death in each group for patients with minor to moderate ischemic stroke (NIHSS score <10).
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26412434     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Combined surgical and interventional treatment of tandem carotid artery and middle cerebral artery embolus: A case report.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Ji-Heng Hao; Kai Lin; Qing-Ke Cui; Li-Yong Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Circulating inflammation-resolving lipid mediators RvD1 and DHA are decreased in patients with acutely symptomatic carotid disease.

Authors:  Hernan A Bazan; Yan Lu; Bokkyoo Jun; Zhide Fang; T Cooper Woods; Song Hong
Journal:  Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.006

3.  Importance of perioperative management for emergency carotid artery stenting within 24h after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: Case report.

Authors:  Akihiro Inoue; Kanehisa Kohno; Shinya Fukumoto; Saya Ozaki; Satoko Ninomiya; Hitomi Tomita; Kenji Kamogawa; Kensho Okamoto; Haruhisa Ichikawa; Shinji Onoue; Hajime Miyazaki; Bungo Okuda; Shinji Iwata
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-07-27

4.  Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset - Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Kanematsu; Junichiro Satomi; Kazuyuki Kuwayama; Izumi Yamaguchi; Shotaro Yoshioka; Tomoya Kinouchi; Yoshiteru Tada; Nobuaki Yamamoto; Shunji Matsubara; Koichi Satoh; Shinji Nagahiro
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Effect of glycated hemoglobin index and mean arterial pressure on acute ischemic stroke prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

Authors:  Shi-Ying Liu; Wen-Feng Cao; Ling-Feng Wu; Zheng-Bing Xiang; Shi-Min Liu; Hai-Yan Liu; Yang Pan; Feng Nie; Xiao-Mu Wu; Xu-Fang Xie
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Emergency Cervical Carotid Artery Stenting After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Doo Hyuk Kwon; Seong Hwa Jang; Hyungjong Park; Sung-Il Sohn; Jeong-Ho Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.