Literature DB >> 28381652

Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset - Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients.

Yasuhisa Kanematsu1, Junichiro Satomi1, Kazuyuki Kuwayama1, Izumi Yamaguchi1, Shotaro Yoshioka1, Tomoya Kinouchi1, Yoshiteru Tada1, Nobuaki Yamamoto2, Shunji Matsubara3, Koichi Satoh4, Shinji Nagahiro1.   

Abstract

As the safety and effectiveness of urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for neurologically progressing patients remain controversial, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of urgent CAS based on the patients' pathophysiological condition and neuroimaging findings. We divided 71 patients who underwent CAS within 14 days of stroke onset into two groups. Group 1 (n = 35) was comprised of patients with progressing neurologic signs and a reversible ischemic penumbra on magnetic resonance images (MRI). They were treated by urgent CAS. Group 2 (n = 36) was neurologically stable and underwent prophylactic CAS. In all patients we recorded the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Urgent CAS resulted in significant improvement in the NIHSS score, when compared before and after CAS in group 1 (5.3 ± 4.3, P < 0.01). The rate of good outcomes (mRS 0-2 at 3 months post-CAS) was 48.6% in group 1, and 75% in group 2. The cumulative incidence of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year was 5.9% in group 1, and 0% in group 2. The procedural complication rate was similar in both groups (group 1: 5.7%, n = 2; group 2: 5.6%, n = 2). No patient suffered a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. When the pathophysiological status and neuroimaging findings are used to determine patient eligibility for urgent CAS, this treatment improve neurologic outcome and can be performed as safely as prophylactic CAS in our cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute ischemic stroke; urgent carotid artery stenting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28381652      PMCID: PMC5495959          DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0470-8105            Impact factor:   1.742


  21 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the risks of carotid endarterectomy in relation to the clinical indication for and timing of surgery.

Authors:  R Bond; K Rerkasem; P M Rothwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Influence of patient-related variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  J Golledge; R Cuming; D K Beattie; A H Davies; R M Greenhalgh
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Risk of early recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis after best medical therapy and before endarterectomy.

Authors:  S Shahidi; A Owen-Falkenberg; B Gottschalksen; K Ellemann
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  Emergent endovascular recanalization for cervical internal carotid artery occlusion in patients presenting with acute stroke.

Authors:  Erik F Hauck; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Hajime Ohta; Christopher S Ogilvy; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Early carotid angioplasty and stenting may offer non-inferior treatment for symptomatic cases of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Michael M Wach; Travis M Dumont; Maxim Mokin; Tareq Kass-Hout; Kenneth V Snyder; L Nelson Hopkins; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke.

Authors:  J F Fairhead; Z Mehta; P M Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Carotid artery stenting in acute stroke.

Authors:  Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Christian Roth; Silke Walter; Stefanie Behnke; Iris Q Grunwald; Julio Viera; Maria Politi; Heiko Körner; Panagiotis Kostopoulos; Anton Haass; Klaus Fassbender; Wolfgang Reith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Peri-procedural Risk with Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting: A Population based Swedvasc Study.

Authors:  M Jonsson; P Gillgren; A Wanhainen; S Acosta; D Lindström
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Early carotid artery stenting and angioplasty in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Osama O Zaidat; Michael J Alexander; Jose I Suarez; Robert W Tarr; Warren R Selman; David S Enterline; Tony P Smith
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Urgent stenting for patients with acute stroke due to atherosclerotic occlusive lesions of the cervical internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Naoko Miyamoto; Isao Naito; Shin Takatama; Tatsuya Shimizu; Tomoyuki Iwai; Hidetoshi Shimaguchi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.