Literature DB >> 26412033

Design of sequentially randomized trials for testing adaptive treatment strategies.

Semhar B Ogbagaber1, Jordan Karp2, Abdus S Wahed1.   

Abstract

An adaptive treatment strategy (ATS) is an outcome-guided algorithm that allows personalized treatment of complex diseases based on patients' disease status and treatment history. Conditions such as AIDS, depression, and cancer usually require several stages of treatment because of the chronic, multifactorial nature of illness progression and management. Sequential multiple assignment randomized (SMAR) designs permit simultaneous inference about multiple ATSs, where patients are sequentially randomized to treatments at different stages depending upon response status. The purpose of the article is to develop a sample size formula to ensure adequate power for comparing two or more ATSs. Based on a Wald-type statistic for comparing multiple ATSs with a continuous endpoint, we develop a sample size formula and test it through simulation studies. We show via simulation that the proposed sample size formula maintains the nominal power. The proposed sample size formula is not applicable to designs with time-to-event endpoints but the formula will be useful for practitioners while designing SMAR trials to compare adaptive treatment strategies.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive treatment strategy (ATS); power; sample size; sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26412033      PMCID: PMC5150988          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

Review 1.  Flexible treatment strategies in chronic disease: clinical and research implications.

Authors:  P W Lavori; R Dawson; A J Rush
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Dynamic treatment regimes: practical design considerations.

Authors:  Philip W Lavori; Ree Dawson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Bayesian and frequentist two-stage treatment strategies based on sequential failure times subject to interval censoring.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Leiko H Wooten; Christopher J Logothetis; Randall E Millikan; Nizar M Tannir
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Efficient design and inference for multistage randomized trials of individualized treatment policies.

Authors:  Ree Dawson; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Up-front versus sequential randomizations for inference on adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  Jin H Ko; Abdus S Wahed
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Randomized phase II study of fludarabine + cytosine arabinoside + idarubicin +/- all-trans retinoic acid +/- granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in poor prognosis newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  E H Estey; P F Thall; S Pierce; J Cortes; M Beran; H Kantarjian; M J Keating; M Andreeff; E Freireich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences.

Authors:  H Lei; I Nahum-Shani; K Lynch; D Oslin; S A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 18.561

Review 9.  Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  William E Pelham; Gregory A Fabiano
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2008-01

10.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Power analysis in a SMART design: sample size estimation for determining the best embedded dynamic treatment regime.

Authors:  William J Artman; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Tianshuang Wu; James R Mckay; Ashkan Ertefaie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Multilevel Interventions Targeting Obesity: Research Recommendations for Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  June Stevens; Charlotte Pratt; Josephine Boyington; Cheryl Nelson; Kimberly P Truesdale; Dianne S Ward; Leslie Lytle; Nancy E Sherwood; Thomas N Robinson; Shirley Moore; Shari Barkin; Ying Kuen Cheung; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  A gate-keeping test for selecting adaptive interventions under general designs of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhong; Bin Cheng; Min Qian; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Bradley S Peterson; Amy E West; John R Weisz; Wendy J Mack; Michele D Kipke; Robert L Findling; Brian S Mittman; Ravi Bansal; Steven Piantadosi; Glenn Takata; Corinna Koebnick; Ceth Ashen; Christopher Snowdy; Marie Poulsen; Bhavana Kumar Arora; Courtney M Allem; Marisa Perez; Stephanie N Marcy; Bradley O Hudson; Stephanie H Chan; Robin Weersing
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Unmet Needs and Challenges in Clinical Research of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome.

Authors:  Nicholas J Seewald; Kelley M Kidwell; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Tianshuang Wu; James R McKay; Daniel Almirall
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  SMARTAR: an R package for designing and analyzing Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhong; Bin Cheng; Xinru Wang; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Clinical Perspectives on Targeting Therapies for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Donald R J Singer; Zoulikha M Zaïr
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.507

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.