| Literature DB >> 26411785 |
Alfonce Leonard1, Gration M Rwegasira2.
Abstract
Species diversity, abundance, and dispersion of rice stem borers in framer's fields were studied in four major rice growing areas of Kahama District. Stem borer larvae were extracted from the damaged tillers in 16 quadrants established in each field. Adult Moths were trapped by light traps and collected in vials for identification. Results indicated the presence of Chilo partellus, Maliarpha separatella, and Sesamia calamistis in all study areas. The most abundant species was C. partellus (48.6%) followed by M. separatella (35.4%) and S. calamistis was least abundant (16.1%). Stem borers dispersion was aggregated along the edges of rice fields in three locations (wards) namely: Bulige, Chela, and Ngaya. The dispersion in the fourth ward, Kashishi was uniform as established from two of the three dispersion indices tested. Further studies would be required to establish the available alternative hosts, the extent of economic losses and the distribution of rice stem borers in the rest of the Lake zone of Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: Tanzania; abundance; dispersion; rice varieties; stem borer
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26411785 PMCID: PMC4664944 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iev106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Lepidopterous stem borers trapped during survey: (a) C. partellus, (b) M. seperatella, and (C) S. calamistis.
Mean (±SE) abundance (%) of stem borer species at the study locations (wards)
| Ward | Insect species | Abundance (pi) |
|---|---|---|
| Kashishi | 33.0 ± 6.95ab | |
| 58.9 ± 8.32a | ||
| 8.1 ± 4.61b | ||
| 5.65 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| 0.004 | ||
| Bulige | 33.8 ± 6.95ab | |
| 45.0 ± 8.32a | ||
| 21.5 ± 4.61b | ||
| 5.09 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| < 0.001 | ||
| Chela | 70.7 ± 6.95a | |
| 12.6 ± 8.32b | ||
| 16.7 ± 4.61b | ||
| 12.41 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 | ||
| Ngaya | 56.8 ± 6.95a | |
| 25.1 ± 8.32b | ||
| 18.1 ± 4.61b | ||
| 15.3 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 |
Mean (±SE) abundance (%) of stem borer species on different rice varieties
| Variety | Insect species | Abundance (pi) |
|---|---|---|
| Kalamata | 69.9 ± 6.57a | |
| 19.6 ± 6.95b | ||
| 10.4 ± 4.49b | ||
| 11.9 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 | ||
| Mayobhe | 53.5 ± 6.57a | |
| 24.4 ± 6.95b | ||
| 22.0 ± 4.49b | ||
| 6.20 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 | ||
| Supa | 55.0 ± 6.57a | |
| 29.4 ± 6.95b | ||
| 15.6 ± 4.49b | ||
| 12.35 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 |
Mean (±SE) abundance (%) of stem borer species as influenced by the sowing dates
| Sowing date | Insect species | Abundance (pi) |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Nov. 2013–30 Nov. 2013 | 51.6 ± 6.95a | |
| 25.5 ± 8.32b | ||
| 22.9 ± 4.61b | ||
| 5.23 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| 0.002 | ||
| 01 Dec. 2013–20 Dec. 2013 | 47.1 ± 6.95a | |
| 44.5 ± 8.32a | ||
| 8.7 ± 4.61b | ||
| 10.50 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 | ||
| 28 Dec. 2013–5 Jan. 2014 | 47.0 ± 6.95a | |
| 36.1 ± 8.32ab | ||
| 16.8 ± 4.61b | ||
| 9.78 | ||
| df | 2, 24 | |
| <0.001 |
Dispersion indices for stem borer larvae at the study locations covered
| Iwao’s mean crowding regression | Taylor power law | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward | Morisista’s index | α | β | SEβ | SE | ||||||
| Kashishi | 0.85 | 0.741 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.129 | −0.28 | 1.49 | 0.06 | 0.91 | 0.006 |
| Bulige | 1.10 | −0.14 | 1.13 | 0.28 | 0.84 | 0.030 | −0.01 | 1.02 | 0.09 | 0.63 | 0.106 |
| Chela | 2.95 | 0.57 | 1.02 | 0.27 | 0.82 | 0.035 | 0.18 | 0.88 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.265 |
| Ngaya | 3.87 | 1.40 | 1.10 | 0.16 | 0.94 | 0.007 | 0.41 | 1.01 | 0.09 | 0.87 | 0.020 |
Fig. 2.Stem borers aggregation within rice fields.