Literature DB >> 26410001

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not adequately stratify risk for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Pamela Samson1, Clifford G Robinson2, Jeffrey Bradley2, Audrey Lee1, Stephen Broderick3, Daniel Kreisel1, A Sasha Krupnick1, G Alexander Patterson1, Varun Puri1, Bryan F Meyers1, Traves Crabtree4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to validate the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Calculator in stratifying risk estimates for patients who received surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer undergoing surgery (N = 279) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (N = 206) from 2009 to 2012 was performed. NSQIP complication risk estimates were calculated for both surgical and stereotactic body radiation therapy cases using the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. NSQIP complication risk estimates were compared as continuous variables and by quartile ranges.
RESULTS: Compared with patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge resection, patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy were older, had larger tumors, had lower forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in 1 second and diffusing capacity of the lungs (DLCO) for carbon monoxide values, had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, had higher rates of dyspnea, and had higher NSQIP serious complication risk estimates (all P < .05). Compared with patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy had similar disparities, along with higher Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE) scores comorbidity scores, higher rates of cardiac comorbidities, and worse functional status (all P < .05). Variables associated with receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment, rather than wedge resection, included increasing age, higher Adult Comorbidity Evaluation (ACE)-27 comorbidity score, dyspnea status, and decreasing FEV1 in 1 second and DLCO for carbon monoxide, but NSQIP serious complication risk score. In addition, surgical patients' actual serious complication rate (16.6% vs 8.8%) and pneumonia rate (6.0% vs 3.2%) were significantly higher than the NSQIP risk calculator predicted (all P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not effectively classify or stratify risk in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Continued efforts are needed to assess risk in this population and develop more tailored treatment decision aids.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP; SBRT; lobectomy; lung cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26410001      PMCID: PMC4957558          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  7 in total

1.  An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Paruch; Clifford Y Ko; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kozower; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Michael J Liptay; Christine L Lau; David R Jones; David M Shahian; Cameron D Wright
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Development and validation of a bariatric surgery morbidity risk calculator using the prospective, multicenter NSQIP dataset.

Authors:  Prateek K Gupta; Christopher Franck; Weldon J Miller; Himani Gupta; R Armour Forse
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease.

Authors:  Mark K Ferguson; Wickii T Vigneswaran
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A propensity-matched analysis of wedge resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Port; Bhupesh Parashar; Nonso Osakwe; Abu Nasar; Paul C Lee; Subroto Paul; Brendon M Stiles; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  National cooperative group trials of "high-risk" patients with lung cancer: are they truly "high-risk"?

Authors:  Varun Puri; Traves D Crabtree; Jennifer M Bell; Daniel Kreisel; Alexander S Krupnick; Stephen Broderick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 4.330

  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  The impact of lung cancer surgery on quality of life trajectories in patients and family caregivers.

Authors:  Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Anna Cathy Williams; Rebecca Fujinami; Karen Reckamp; Marianna Koczywas; Mihaela Cristea; Arti Hurria; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Risk calculators are useful but....

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Mark F Berry
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Predicting Post-operative Complications in Crohn's Disease: an Appraisal of Clinical Scoring Systems and the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Kevin R McMahon; Kenneth D Allen; Anita Afzali; Syed Husain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Concomitant Mediastinoscopy Increases the Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia After Pulmonary Lobectomy.

Authors:  Sai Yendamuri; Athar Battoo; Kris Attwood; Samjot Singh Dhillon; Grace K Dy; Mark Hennon; Anthony Picone; Chukwumere Nwogu; Todd Demmy; Elisabeth Dexter
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian M Blair; Erik B Lehman; Syed M Jafri; Matthew G Kaag; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Association of Socioeconomic Area Deprivation Index with Hospital Readmissions After Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Federico M Ghirimoldi; Susanne Schmidt; Richard C Simon; Chen-Pin Wang; Zhu Wang; Bradley B Brimhall; Paul Damien; Eric E Moffett; Laura S Manuel; Zaheer U Sarwar; Paula K Shireman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A systematic review of risk prediction models for perioperative mortality after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Taylor; Syed F Hashmi; Glen P Martin; Michael Shackcloth; Rajesh Shah; Richard Booton; Stuart W Grant
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Improved Preoperative Risk-Assessment Tools Are Needed to Guide Informed Decision-Making Before Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Katherine D Gray; Tamar B Nobel; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Neel Chudgar; Shi Yan; Valerie W Rusch; David R Jones; Gaetano Rocco; Daniela Molena; James M Isbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 13.787

9.  Predicting complications of major head and neck oncological surgery: an evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator.

Authors:  Peter S Vosler; Mario Orsini; Danny J Enepekides; Kevin M Higgins
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-22

10.  The American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator performs well for pulmonary resection: A validation study.

Authors:  Neel Chudgar; Shi Yan; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Katherine D Gray; Daniela Molena; David R Jones; Valerie W Rusch; Gaetano Rocco; James M Isbell
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.