Literature DB >> 26409558

Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.

Mitra Montazeri1,2, Mohadeseh Montazeri3,4, Mahdieh Montazeri5, Amin Beigzadeh6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers with a high mortality rate among women. With the early diagnosis of breast cancer survival will increase from 56% to more than 86%. Therefore, an accurate and reliable system is necessary for the early diagnosis of this cancer. The proposed model is the combination of rules and different machine learning techniques. Machine learning models can help physicians to reduce the number of false decisions. They try to exploit patterns and relationships among a large number of cases and predict the outcome of a disease using historical cases stored in datasets.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to propose a rule-based classification method with machine learning techniques for the prediction of different types of Breast cancer survival.
METHODS: We use a dataset with eight attributes that include the records of 900 patients in which 876 patients (97.3%) and 24 (2.7%) patients were females and males respectively. Naive Bayes (NB), Trees Random Forest (TRF), 1-Nearest Neighbor (1NN), AdaBoost (AD), Support Vector Machine (SVM), RBF Network (RBFN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) machine learning techniques with 10-cross fold technique were used with the proposed model for the prediction of breast cancer survival. The performance of machine learning techniques were evaluated with accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve.
RESULTS: Out of 900 patients, 803 patients and 97 patients were alive and dead, respectively. In this study, Trees Random Forest (TRF) technique showed better results in comparison to other techniques (NB, 1NN, AD, SVM and RBFN, MLP). The accuracy, sensitivity and the area under ROC curve of TRF are 96%, 96%, 93%, respectively. However, 1NN machine learning technique provided poor performance (accuracy 91%, sensitivity 91% and area under ROC curve 78%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that Trees Random Forest model (TRF) which is a rule-based classification model was the best model with the highest level of accuracy. Therefore, this model is recommended as a useful tool for breast cancer survival prediction as well as medical decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer survival prediction; classification; machine learning models

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26409558     DOI: 10.3233/THC-151071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Health Care        ISSN: 0928-7329            Impact factor:   1.285


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer diagnosis: looking into the future.

Authors:  Muhammad Javed Iqbal; Zeeshan Javed; Haleema Sadia; Ijaz A Qureshi; Asma Irshad; Rais Ahmed; Kausar Malik; Shahid Raza; Asif Abbas; Raffaele Pezzani; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  The effects of genetic variants related to insulin metabolism pathways and the interactions with lifestyles on colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Su Yon Jung; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Impact of Machine Learning With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amirhessam Tahmassebi; Georg J Wengert; Thomas H Helbich; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Sousan Alaei; Rupert Bartsch; Peter Dubsky; Pascal Baltzer; Paola Clauser; Panagiotis Kapetas; Elizabeth A Morris; Anke Meyer-Baese; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Pro-inflammatory cytokine polymorphisms in ONECUT2 and HNF4A and primary colorectal carcinoma: a post genome-wide gene-lifestyle interaction study.

Authors:  Su Yon Jung; Jeanette C Papp; Eric M Sobel; Matteo Pellegrini; Herbert Yu; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Genetic Variants in Metabolic Signaling Pathways and Their Interaction with Lifestyle Factors on Breast Cancer Risk: A Random Survival Forest Analysis.

Authors:  Su Yon Jung; Jeanette C Papp; Eric M Sobel; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-10-26

6.  Automated model versus treating physician for predicting survival time of patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael F Gensheimer; Sonya Aggarwal; Kathryn R K Benson; Justin N Carter; A Solomon Henry; Douglas J Wood; Scott G Soltys; Steven Hancock; Erqi Pollom; Nigam H Shah; Daniel T Chang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Using Machine Learning to Unravel the Value of Radiographic Features for the Classification of Bone Tumors.

Authors:  Derun Pan; Renyi Liu; Bowen Zheng; Jianxiang Yuan; Hui Zeng; Zilong He; Zhendong Luo; Genggeng Qin; Weiguo Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Prediction of Multiple sclerosis disease using machine learning classifiers: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sonia Darvishi; Omid Hamidi; Jalal Poorolajal
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2021-04-29

9.  Leveraging 16S rRNA Microbiome Sequencing Data to Identify Bacterial Signatures for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Authors:  Yuxia Liu; Wenhui Li; Hongxia Yang; Xiaoying Zhang; Wenxiu Wang; Sitong Jia; Beibei Xiang; Yi Wang; Lin Miao; Han Zhang; Lin Wang; Yujing Wang; Jixiang Song; Yingjie Sun; Lijuan Chai; Xiaoxuan Tian
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Survival prognostic factors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia using machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Keyvan Karami; Mahboubeh Akbari; Mohammad-Taher Moradi; Bijan Soleymani; Hossein Fallahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.