Literature DB >> 26409413

Pars and pedicle fracture and screw loosening associated with cortical bone trajectory: a case series and proposed mechanism through a cadaveric study.

Wayne K Cheng1, Yusuf T Akpolat2, Serkan İnceoğlu2, Shalin Patel2, Olumide A Danisa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique for pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine has become more popular since its introduction in 2009. The distinct advantages of using the CBT technique involve increased screw purchase within the cortical bone and reduced surgical dissection. However, contrary to several favorable biomechanical results, there were anecdotal reports of clinical complications associated with CBT.
PURPOSE: This study aimed (1) to report on two unique pars and pedicle fracture cases involving the use of the CBT technique and (2) to perform a cadaveric pilot study to determine the possible mechanism for this fracture pattern. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A case report and cadaveric study were carried out.
METHODS: After presenting two clinical cases, 19 fresh-frozen lumbar vertebrae were obtained from 8 cadavers. Pedicle screws were instrumented on each level using CBT under video recording. After the instrumentation, X-ray images were obtained, and anatomical dissections were performed.
RESULTS: To be able to reach a necessary angle for medial to lateral CBT trajectory, 13 out of 19 (68%) spinous processes had to be removed. There were a total of seven complications. One pars and pedicle fracture out of 37 trajectories (2.7%) and 6 out of 37 trajectory deviations (16.2%), which resulted in gross loosening, were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The head of the pedicle screw impinging on the base of spinous process and lamina was observed in our cadaveric model. This mechanism could potentially explain both screw loosening and fractures associated with the CBT technique.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Cortical bone trajectory; Pars fracture; Pedicle fracture; Pedicle screw instrumentation; Screw loosening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26409413     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  5 in total

1.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Review of Cortical Bone Trajectory: Evidence of a New Technique.

Authors:  Juan Delgado-Fernandez; Maria Ángeles García-Pallero; Guillermo Blasco; Paloma Pulido-Rivas; Rafael G Sola
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

3.  Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability in TLIF, PLIF, and XLIF Applications.

Authors:  Edward K Nomoto; Guy R Fogel; Alexandre Rasouli; Justin V Bundy; Alexander W Turner
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 4.  Lumbar pedicle screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory: A review from anatomical and biomechanical standpoints.

Authors:  Keitaro Matsukawa; Yoshiyuki Yato
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-11-27

5.  Risk of pedicle and spinous process violation during cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Lilian Zhang; Naifeng Tian; Jian Yang; Wenfei Ni; Liya Jin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.