Literature DB >> 26408611

How to assess the quality of your analytical method?

Elizabeta Topic, Nora Nikolac, Mauro Panteghini, Elvar Theodorsson, Gian Luca Salvagno, Marijana Miler, Ana-Maria Simundic, Ilenia Infusino, Gunnar Nordin, Sten Westgard.   

Abstract

Laboratory medicine is amongst the fastest growing fields in medicine, crucial in diagnosis, support of prevention and in the monitoring of disease for individual patients and for the evaluation of treatment for populations of patients. Therefore, high quality and safety in laboratory testing has a prominent role in high-quality healthcare. Applied knowledge and competencies of professionals in laboratory medicine increases the clinical value of laboratory results by decreasing laboratory errors, increasing appropriate utilization of tests, and increasing cost effectiveness. This collective paper provides insights into how to validate the laboratory assays and assess the quality of methods. It is a synopsis of the lectures at the 15th European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Continuing Postgraduate Course in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine entitled "How to assess the quality of your method?" (Zagreb, Croatia, 24-25 October 2015). The leading topics to be discussed include who, what and when to do in validation/verification of methods, verification of imprecision and bias, verification of reference intervals, verification of qualitative test procedures, verification of blood collection systems, comparability of results among methods and analytical systems, limit of detection, limit of quantification and limit of decision, how to assess the measurement uncertainty, the optimal use of Internal Quality Control and External Quality Assessment data, Six Sigma metrics, performance specifications, as well as biological variation. This article, which continues the annual tradition of collective papers from the EFLM continuing postgraduate courses in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, aims to provide further contributions by discussing the quality of laboratory methods and measurements and, at the same time, to offer continuing professional development to the attendees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26408611     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Quality specifications of routine clinical chemistry methods based on sigma metrics in performance evaluation.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Su-Feng Chen; Fei Xu; Yong-Lie Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Implementation of biological variation-based analytical performance specifications in the laboratory: Stringent evaluation of Improvacutor blood collection tubes.

Authors:  Hee-Jung Chung; Yoon Kyung Song; Sung Kuk Hong; Sang-Hyun Hwang; Hee Seung Seo; Dong Hee Whang; Myung-Hyun Nam; Do Hoon Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies.

Authors:  Ceyhan Ceran Serdar; Murat Cihan; Doğan Yücel; Muhittin A Serdar
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

4.  Nucleophosmin1 and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 as measurable residual disease markers in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Petra Kövy; Zoltán Őrfi; András Bors; András Kozma; László Gopcsa; János Dolgos; Nóra Lovas; József Harasztdombi; Viktor Lakatos; Ágnes Király; Gábor Mikala; István Vályi-Nagy; Péter Reményi; Hajnalka Andrikovics
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.