| Literature DB >> 26407218 |
Khushica Purbhoo1, Mboyo Di Tamba Willy Vangu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When using (99m)Tc sestamibi for myocardial perfusion imaging, increased splanchnic activity creates a problem in the visual and quantitative interpretation of the inferior and infero-septal walls of the left ventricle. We sought to determine whether the administration of diluted lemon juice or full-fat milk would be effective in reducing interfering infra-cardiac activity and therefore result in an improvement in image quality. We compared the administration of full-fat milk and diluted lemon juice to a control group that had no intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26407218 PMCID: PMC4683295 DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr ISSN: 1015-9657 Impact factor: 1.167
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Exclusion criteria | |
| Patients older than 18 years of age | Lactose intolerance |
| Patients referred for 99mTc sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging | Patients who failed exercise stress testing and had a contra-indication to pharmacological stress testing, i.e. using vasodilators and dobutamine |
| Unable to drink 250 ml of fluids secondary to medically essential fluid restriction | |
| Pregnant patients | |
| Previous cholecystectomy, liver or biliary system disease | |
| Peptic ulcer disease within the last six months | |
| History of diabetes mellitus | |
| Previous myocardial infarction within the last two months, unstable angina, severe primary valvular disease, left ventricular aneurysm, primary cardiomegaly, left ventricle hypertrophy or severe conduction disturbances |
Figure 1.Example of the grading of the relative intensity of infra-cardiac activity compared to myocardial activity
Figure 2.Anterior image. ROI in the inferior wall of the left ventricle copied to the infra-cardiac ROI (Slice 15)
Figure 3.Lateral image. ROI in the inferior wall of the left ventricle copied to the infra-cardiac ROI (Slice 45)
Patient characteristics
| Control group (G2) | |||||
| Number | 630 | 246 (39) | 313 (50) | 71 (11) | |
| Mean age ± SD (year) | 58.21 ± 11.42 | 62.03 ± 11.43 | 61.37 ± 9.02 | ||
| Gender, frequency (%) | 0.003 | ||||
| Male | 326 (52) | 109 (44) | 171 (55) | 46 (65) | |
| Female | 304 (48) | 137 (56) | 142 (45) | 25 (35) | |
| Stress, frequency (%) | 0.83 | ||||
| Exercise | 319 (51) | 127 (52) | 144 (46) | 48 (68) | |
| Pharmacological | 311 (49) | 119 (48) | 169 (54) | 23 (32) | |
| Ethnicity, frequency (%) | 0.0002 | ||||
| Black | 193 (30) | 71 (29) | 81 (26) | 41 (58) | |
| Caucasian | 238 (37) | 95 (39) | 131 (42) | 12 (17) | |
| Indian | 140 (22) | 59 (24) | 68 (22) | 13 (18) | |
| Coloured | 59 (11) | 21 (8) | 33 (10) | 5 (7) |
*Total p-value represents the p-value for the three study groups.
Evaluation of infra-cardiac activity by visual assessment
| Stress, frequency (%): presence of infra-cardiac activity | 0.005 | ||||
| Yes | 528 | 201 (84.1) | 257 (84.5) | 70 (97)) | |
| No | 86 | 38 (15.9) | 47 (15.5) | 1 (3) | |
| Rest, frequency (%): presence of infra-cardiac activity | 0.0063 | ||||
| Yes | 564 | 219 (91.7) | 274 (90.1) | 71 (100) | |
| No | 50 | 20 ( 8.3) | 30 (9.9) | 0 |
Presence of infra-cardiac activity was graded as ‘yes’ and absence as ‘no’ *Total p-value represents the p-value for the three study groups.
Visual grading of the intensity of infra-cardiac activity versus myocardial activity
| Stress, frequency (%) | 0.0002 | ||||
| Lemon juice (G0) | 38 (16) | 138 (58) | 46 (19) | 17 (7) | |
| Milk (G1) | 47 (16) | 166 (55) | 49 (16) | 42 (14) | |
| Control (G2) | 1 (1) | 47 (66) | 19 (28) | 4 (6) | |
| Rest, frequency (%) | 0.004 | ||||
| Lemon juice (G0) | 20 (8) | 100 (42) | 73 (31) | 46 (19) | |
| Milk (G1) | 29 (10) | 137 (45) | 84 (28) | 54 (18) | |
| Control (G2) | 0 | 24 (34) | 28 (39) | 19 (27) | |
*Total p-value represents the p-value for the three study groups.
0: absent infra-cardiac activity
1: bowel activity < myocardial activity
2: bowel activity = myocardial activity
3: bowel activity > myocardial activity
Figure 4.Visual grading of myocardial activity for the three groups at stress.
Figure 5.Visual grading of myocardial activity for the three groups at rest.
Total counts in the myocardium and infra-cardiac area in the anterior and lateral view
| Stress, inferior myocardium anterior | 634.5 (185–2648)* | 733 (160–3260)# | 553 (144–1566) | < 0.0001 |
| Stress, infra-cardiac anterior | 391 (79–1728) | 429 (101–2551)# | 364 (73–1308) | 0.0106 |
| Stress, inferior myocardium lateral | 584 (103–2100)* ( | 673 (175–3913)# | 534 (172–1693) | 0.019 |
| Stress, infra-cardiac lateral | 419 (63–2119) | 452 (90–2347) | 393 (88–1805) | 0.1129 |
| Rest, inferior myocardium anterior | 633.5 (186–8181)* | 694 (36–2308) | 586 (159–7171) | 0.0089 |
| Rest, infra-cardiac anterior | 464 (83–2101) | 512 (89–2329) | 443 (145–1288) | 0.088 |
| Rest, inferior myocardium lateral | 617.5 (109–2986)* | 691 (32–2628) | 612 (212–1897) | 0.007 |
| Rest, infra-cardiac lateral | 488.5 (978–2672)* | 552 (15–3037) | 547 (126–1646) | 0.020 |
*p < 0.05 between the lemon juice group (G0) and the milk group (G1).
#p < 0.05 between the milk group (G1) and the control group (G2).