Literature DB >> 26405166

Radiation Treatment of Lymph Node Recurrence from Prostate Cancer: Is 11C-Choline PET/CT Predictive of Survival Outcomes?

Elena Incerti1, Andrei Fodor2, Paola Mapelli1, Claudio Fiorino3, Pierpaolo Alongi1, Margarita Kirienko4, Giampiero Giovacchini5, Elena Busnardo1, Luigi Gianolli1, Nadia Di Muzio2, Maria Picchio6.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: PET/CT is a valuable tool to detect lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with biochemical failure after primary treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim was to assess the predictive role of imaging parameters derived by (11)C-choline PET/CT on survival outcomes-overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS), and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS)-in patients treated with helical tomotherapy (HTT) for LN recurrence.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 patients affected by PCa (mean age, 68 y; age range, 51-81 y) with biochemical recurrence after primary treatment (median prostate-specific antigen values obtained at the time of PET/CT scan, 2.42 ng/mL; range, 0.61-27.56 ng/mL) who underwent (11)C-choline PET/CT from January 2005 to January 2013 and were treated with HTT in correspondence of the pathologic choline LN uptake. PET-derived parameters, including maximum/mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) with a threshold of 40%, 50%, and 60% were calculated. The best cutoff values of PET-derived parameters discriminating between patients with and without relapse, after treatment guided by PET, were assessed by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis including the most predictive PET-derived parameters and survival outcomes were performed.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 20 mo (mean, 26 mo; range, 3-97 mo). (11)C-choline PET/CT showed pathologic LN uptake in 4 patients at the pelvic level, in 5 at the abdominal level, in 13 at both the pelvic and the abdominal level, and in 46 at the abdominal or pelvic or other sites. The 2-y overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, cRFS, and bRFS were 87%, 91%, 51%, and 40%, respectively. On the basis of ROC curves, the most discriminative cutoff value for MTV values was an MTV threshold of 60% (MTV60) of greater than 0.64 cm(3). No significant cutoff values were found for SUVmax or SUVmean at univariate analysis, whereas MTV60 was confirmed as an independent predictor in multivariate analysis and significantly correlated with bRFS and cRFS. MTV60 and extrapelvic disease well predict the risk of cRFS.
CONCLUSION: (11)C-choline PET/CT performed as a guide for HTT on LN recurrence is predictive of survival. In particular, MTV60 and extrapelvic disease were the best predictors of tumor response for bRFS and cRFS in PCa patients with LN recurrence after primary treatment. This information may be useful in emerging treatment strategies.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  11C-choline PET/CT; imaging parameters; lymph node recurrence; prostate cancer; survival outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26405166     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  8 in total

Review 1.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  PET imaging of recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer with novel tracers.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in prostate cancer patients with PSA < 1 NG/ml.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Priscilla Guglielmo; Paola Mapelli; Elena Incerti; Ana Maria Samanes Gajate; Elisabetta Giovannini; Mattia Riondato; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Andrea Ciarmiello; Maria Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Could 68-Ga PSMA PET/CT become a new tool in the decision-making strategy of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence of PSA after radical prostatectomy? A preliminary, monocentric series.

Authors:  Berardino De Bari; Rosario Mazzola; Dario Aiello; Sergio Fersino; Fabiana Gregucci; Pierpaolo Alongi; Maurizio Nicodemo; Stefano Cavalleri; Matteo Salgarello; Filippo Alongi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Machine learning-based radiomics for multiple primary prostate cancer biological characteristics prediction with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET: comparison among different volume segmentation thresholds.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Yunjun Yang; Fei Yao; Shuying Bian; Dongqin Zhu; Yaping Yuan; Kehua Pan; Zhifang Pan; Xianghao Feng
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 6.  Oligorecurrent prostate cancer limited to lymph nodes: getting our ducks in a row : Nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrei Fodor; Andrea Lancia; Francesco Ceci; Maria Picchio; Morten Hoyer; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Piet Ost; Paolo Castellucci; Elena Incerti; Nadia Di Muzio; Gianluca Ingrosso
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  PSMA and Choline PET for the Assessment of Response to Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review from the Literature.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Alongi; Riccardo Laudicella; Helena Lanzafame; Andrea Farolfi; Paola Mapelli; Maria Picchio; Irene A Burger; Andrei Iagaru; Fabio Minutoli; Laura Evangelista
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Target Definition in Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Role of Advanced Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Gaël Amzalag; Olivier Rager; Claire Tabouret-Viaud; Michael Wissmeyer; Electra Sfakianaki; Thomas de Perrot; Osman Ratib; Raymond Miralbell; Giampiero Giovacchini; Valentina Garibotto; Thomas Zilli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.