| Literature DB >> 26404318 |
Roselyn Valles-Regino1, Rick Tate2, Brendan Kelaher3, Dale Savins4, Ashley Dowell5, Kirsten Benkendorff6.
Abstract
Ocean warming and acidification are current global environmental challenges impacting aquatic organisms. A shift in conditions outside the optimal environmental range for marine species is likely to generate stress that could impact metabolic activity, with consequences for the biosynthesis of marine lipids. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the lipid content of Dicathais orbita exposed to current and predicted future climate change scenarios. The whelks were exposed to a combination of temperature and CO₂-induced acidification treatments in controlled flowthrough seawater mesocosms for 35 days. Under current conditions, D. orbita foot tissue has an average of 6 mg lipid/g tissue, but at predicted future ocean temperatures, the total lipid content dropped significantly, to almost half. The fatty acid composition is dominated by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA 52%) with an n-3:6 fatty acid ratio of almost 2, which remains unchanged under future ocean conditions. However, we detected an interactive effect of temperature and pCO₂ on the % PUFAs and n-3 and n-6 fatty acids were significantly reduced by elevated water temperature, while both the saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids were significantly reduced under increased pCO₂ acidifying conditions. The present study indicates the potential for relatively small predicted changes in ocean conditions to reduce lipid reserves and alter the fatty acid composition of a predatory marine mollusc. This has potential implications for the growth and survivorship of whelks under future conditions, but only minimal implications for human consumption of D. orbita as nutritional seafood are predicted.Entities:
Keywords: Dicathais orbita; marine lipids; n-3; n-6; ocean climate change; plasmalogens; polyunsaturated fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26404318 PMCID: PMC4626677 DOI: 10.3390/md13106019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Total lipid yield extracted from the foot tissue of D. orbita after 35 days exposure to temperature and pCO2 treatments (n = 6 per group). Error bars show standard error of the mean. * Significantly different to the control at 23 °C and current pCO2 (p < 0.05).
Summary of the statistical outcomes for all univariate and multivariate analyses. Two factor PERMANOVAs were used to test the effects of temperature and pCO2 induced acidification. Significant effects are in bold.
| Temperature | Acidification | Temperature × Acidification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudo | Pseudo | Pseudo | ||||
| UNIVARIATE | ||||||
| Total lipid yield | 19.1230 | 1.9863 | 0.1796 | 1.6396 | 0.2098 | |
| SFA | 3.6189 | 0.0733 | 4.2989 | 3.1075 | 0.0905 | |
| MUFA | 0.4115 | 0.5451 | 5.7182 | 0.0063 | 0.9373 | |
| PUFA | 10.981 | 0.0281 | 0.8705 | 6.7298 | ||
| 4.7150 | 0.0002 | 0.9881 | 1.8572 | 0.1848 | ||
| 5.1551 | 1.2660 | 0.2742 | 0.0452 | 0.8261 | ||
| 0.33697 | 0.5697 | 0.20287 | 0.6637 | 1.0828 | 0.3088 | |
| MULTIVARIATE | ||||||
| Overall fatty acid composition | 7.7094 | 0.0001 | 2.8452 | 0.0229 | 1.7186 | 0.1321 |
Figure 2Proportions of (a) polysaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (n = 6) showing relative amounts of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids; (b) saturated fatty acids (SFA) (n = 12) and (c) monosaturated fatty acids (MUFA) (n = 12) in D. orbita foot tissue after 35 days exposure to different temperatures and CO2-induced acidification. Error bars show standard error of the mean. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) within the same group of fatty acids, in comparison to the control at 23 °C and current pCO2.
Fatty acid and lipophilic hydrocarbon profile of D. orbita foot tissue after 35 days exposure to current and future ocean temperatures and acidification conditions. Data are expressed as % of total fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) as mean ± SE (n = 12). Others include cyclopropane fatty acids and dimethyl acetal aldehydes from plasmalogen phospholipids.
| Fatty Acid | Trivial Name | Retention Time (min) | 23 °C, Current | 23 °C, Future | 25 °C, Current | 25 °C, Future |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturated | ||||||
| C14:0 | Myristic | 16.8 | 1.46 ± 0.13 | 1.56 ± 0.05 | 1.74 ± 0.08 | 1.28 ± 0.12 |
| C15:0 | Pentadecanoic | 18.4 | 1.24 ± 0.18 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 1.38 ± 0.11 | 1.11 ± 0.12 |
| C16:0 | Palmitic | 19.8 | 9.26 ± 0.49 | 8.86 ± 0.17 | 9.53 ± 0.39 | 8.66 ± 0.23 |
| C17:0 | Margaric | 21.3 | 1.98 ± 0.12 | 1.71 ± 0.10 | 1.31 ± 0.12 | 1.22 ± 0.13 |
| C18:0 | Stearic | 22.6 | 8.26 ± 0.49 | 8.17 ± 0.15 | 7.90 ± 0.24 | 8.30 ± 0.12 |
| C24:0 | Lignoceric | 29.7 | 4.54 ± 0.16 | 4.99 ± 0.36 | 4.81 ± 0.16 | 4.18 ± 0.13 |
| Monounsaturated | ||||||
| C16:1 | Palmitoleic | 20.6 | 1.87 ± 0.16 | 0.84 ± 0.32 | 0.89 ± 0.25 | 0.86 ± 0.23 |
| C18:1 ( | Oleic | 23.1 | 4.54 ± 0.49 | 4.96 ± 0.07 | 4.89 ± 0.23 | 4.42 ± 0.06 |
| C20:1 ( | 11-Eicosenoic | 25.7 | 3.50 ± 0.11 | 3.40 ± 0.19 | 3.81 ± 0.16 | 3.81 ± 0.19 |
| C22:1 ( | Erucic | 30.2 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.15 ± 0.07 |
| Polyunsaturated | ||||||
| C18:2 ( | Linoleic acid (LA) | 24.1 | 1.54 ± 0.09 | 1.51 ± 0.07 | 1.66 ± 0.12 | 1.69 ± 0.08 |
| C18:3 ( | α-Linolenic (ALA) | 25.1 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.77 ± 0.04 |
| C20:2 | Eicosadienoic | 26.5 | 2.50 ± 0.13 | 2.89 ± 0.16 | 2.60 ± 0.1 | 2.45 ± 0.13 |
| C20:3 ( | Eicosatrienoic | 27.1 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 |
| C20:4 ( | Arachidonic (ARA) | 27.3 | 11.49 ± 0.22 | 11.84 ± 0.26 | 10.88 ± 0.16 | 11.07 ± 0.14 |
| C20:5 ( | Eicosapentaenoic (EPA) | 28.3 | 2.61 ± 0.30 | 2.76 ± 0.33 | 2.00 ± 0.42 | 2.05 ± 0.44 |
| C22:2 | Docosadienoic | 28.5 | 11.15 ± 0.57 | 10.15 ± 0.39 | 11.81 ± 0.51 | 11.40 ± 0.42 |
| C22:5 ( | Docosapentaenoic (DPA) | 30.7 | 17.72 ± 0.49 | 16.87 ± 0.52 | 16.13 ± 0.40 | 16.69 ± 0.39 |
| C22:6 ( | Docosahexaenoic (DHA) | 30.9 | 4.02 ± 0.27 | 3.70 ± 0.13 | 3.55 ± 0.26 | 3.85 ± 0.35 |
| Others | ||||||
| 2-octylcyclo-propanedecanoic | 26.8 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | |
| Unknown fatty acid derivative | 29.2 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | |
| Dimethyl acetal aldehydes | ||||||
| Hexadecan | 18.8 | 1.04 ± 0.08 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.87 ± 0.70 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | |
| Heptadecan-1-al | 20.2 | 0.21 ± 0.05 | 1.03 ± 0.26 | 0.86 ± 0.17 | 1.78 ± 0.06 | |
| Octadecan-1-al | 21.7 | 8.91 ± 0.83 | 10.27 ± 0.20 | 10.80 ± 0.29 | 11.92 ± 0.20 | |
| Nonadecan-1-al | 24.7 | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.06 | |
Figure 3Principal coordinate ordination (PCO) of the lipophilic compound profile from D. orbita based on a Euclidian distance similarity matrix of the percent composition data with vector overlay from Spearman rank correlation of 0.6.