Literature DB >> 26404127

Staging classification for cancer of the ovary and the fallopian tube should include in situ carcinoma.

Wiebren A A Tjalma1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26404127      PMCID: PMC4620375          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor: We read with interest the almost identical articles on staging classification for ovarian and fallopian tube cancer that were published in several journals [12345678]. What is missing in the staging classification is the in situ carcinoma or Tis for ovary and fallopian tube. Cancer staging is important and necessary for explaining epidemiologic changes, defining the disease at presentation, planning adequate treatment and evaluating the overall impact of new therapies [2]. In situ carcinoma of the ovary is extremely rare [9]. In situ carcinoma of the fallopian tube on the other hand is not so rare as one would expect. In situ carcinoma of the fallopian tube is found in 3% to 12% of the BRCA carriers who have a prophylactic removal of the tubes [1011]. It is hypothesized that the fallopian tube is the origin of ovarian cancer. Clinical studies are ongoing to test this idea. An in situ carcinoma doesn't metastasize but it can give implant lesions in the abdomen or lead to involvement of the ascites or peritoneal washings. Due to the raised awareness and the improved imaging more and more in situ cancers of the fallopian tube will be detected. Ovarian cancer and tubal cancer prevention strategy is mainly based on surgery. It is therefore important to stage these in situ carcinomas correctly in order to understand each other and to allow treatment comparising. There are 4 possible staging classification for Tis: (1) Tis without implants or involvement of the ascites and peritoneal washings; (2) Tis with implants but without or involvement of the ascites and peritoneal washings; (3) Tis with implants and involvement of the ascites and peritoneal washings; (4) Tis without implants but with involvement of the ascites and peritoneal washings. Furthermore all women with an ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneum cancer should have a genetic testing for BRCA mutation. This should also be recorded in the staging classification. In the era of personalized cancer medicine accurate staging is essential, as it assigns patients to a specific group with specific treatments possibilities and consequently improved survival. Only if you look for things you will find it and you can improve it.
  11 in total

1.  Pathologic findings in prophylactic oophorectomy specimens in high-risk women.

Authors:  Katherine Leeper; Rochelle Garcia; Elizabeth Swisher; Barbara Goff; Benjamin Greer; Pamela Paley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Abridged republication of FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum.

Authors:  J Prat; H Belhadj; J Berek; A Bermudez; N Bhatla; J Cain; L Denny; K Fujiwara; N Hacker; E Avall-Lundqvist; D Mutch; F Odicino; S Pecorelli; M Quinn; M A-F Seoud; S K Shrivastava
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.196

3.  Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum: Abridged Republication of Guidelines From the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Abridged republication of FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  2014 FIGO staging for ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  David G Mutch; Jaime Prat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer staging: Rationale and explanation of new FIGO staging 2013.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.237

8.  Primary fallopian tube malignancies in BRCA-positive women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Christopher P Crum; Fabiola Medeiros; David W Kindelberger; Julia A Elvin; Judy E Garber; Colleen M Feltmate; Ross S Berkowitz; Michael G Muto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: abridged republication.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Ovarian carcinoma in situ of presumable fallopian tube origin in a patient with Lynch syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Kayo Inoue; Hiroshi Tsubamoto; Hiroyuki Hao; Kazuo Tamura; Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.