Tam T Nguyen-Louie1, Norma Castro2, Georg E Matt3, Lindsay M Squeglia4, Ty Brumback2, Susan F Tapert5,2. 1. San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 4. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 5. Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adolescence is a period of neuromaturation concomitant with increased substance involvement. Most substance use studies of adolescents have focused on categorical classifications (e.g., dependent vs. nondependent), but little is known about the influence of specific substance use behaviors on cognitive functioning in youth. METHOD: This study prospectively evaluated the quantitative effects of different substance use behaviors on neuropsychological functioning. A cognitive test battery was administered at baseline (ages 12-14 years), before substance use initiation, and at follow-up (M = 4.0 years, SD = 2.0) to evaluate changes in verbal memory, visuospatial ability, psychomotor speed, processing speed, and working memory. Robust regressions examined substance use behaviors as predictors of neuropsychological functioning (N = 234). RESULTS: Several substance use behaviors predicted follow-up neuropsychological functioning above and beyond effects of baseline performance on the same measure (ps < .05). Specifically, more alcohol use days predicted worse verbal memory (β = -.15) and visuospatial ability (β = -.19). More postdrinking effects (β = -.15) and greater drug use (β = -.11) predicted worse psychomotor speed. Processing speed was not predicted by substance involvement (ps > .05). Unexpectedly, more alcohol use predicted better working memory performance (β = .12). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency and intensity of adolescent alcohol use may be more intricately linked to neuropsychological outcomes than previously considered. The low prevalence of substance use disorder in the sample suggests that subdiagnostic users may still experience adverse effects to verbal memory, visuospatial functioning, and psychomotor speed after initiating intense or frequent alcohol use.
OBJECTIVE: Adolescence is a period of neuromaturation concomitant with increased substance involvement. Most substance use studies of adolescents have focused on categorical classifications (e.g., dependent vs. nondependent), but little is known about the influence of specific substance use behaviors on cognitive functioning in youth. METHOD: This study prospectively evaluated the quantitative effects of different substance use behaviors on neuropsychological functioning. A cognitive test battery was administered at baseline (ages 12-14 years), before substance use initiation, and at follow-up (M = 4.0 years, SD = 2.0) to evaluate changes in verbal memory, visuospatial ability, psychomotor speed, processing speed, and working memory. Robust regressions examined substance use behaviors as predictors of neuropsychological functioning (N = 234). RESULTS: Several substance use behaviors predicted follow-up neuropsychological functioning above and beyond effects of baseline performance on the same measure (ps < .05). Specifically, more alcohol use days predicted worse verbal memory (β = -.15) and visuospatial ability (β = -.19). More postdrinking effects (β = -.15) and greater drug use (β = -.11) predicted worse psychomotor speed. Processing speed was not predicted by substance involvement (ps > .05). Unexpectedly, more alcohol use predicted better working memory performance (β = .12). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency and intensity of adolescent alcohol use may be more intricately linked to neuropsychological outcomes than previously considered. The low prevalence of substance use disorder in the sample suggests that subdiagnostic users may still experience adverse effects to verbal memory, visuospatial functioning, and psychomotor speed after initiating intense or frequent alcohol use.
Authors: Donald W Zeigler; Claire C Wang; Richard A Yoast; Barry D Dickinson; Mary Anne McCaffree; Carolyn B Robinowitz; Melvyn L Sterling Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Thomas P Beresford; David B Arciniegas; Julie Alfers; Lori Clapp; Brandon Martin; Yiping Du; Dengfeng Liu; Dinggang Shen; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Edith V Sullivan; Ty Brumback; Susan F Tapert; Rosemary Fama; Devin Prouty; Sandra A Brown; Kevin Cummins; Wesley K Thompson; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Michael D De Bellis; Stephen R Hooper; Duncan B Clark; Tammy Chung; Bonnie J Nagel; B Nolan Nichols; Torsten Rohlfing; Weiwei Chu; Kilian M Pohl; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Tam T Nguyen-Louie; Georg E Matt; Joanna Jacobus; Irene Li; Claudia Cota; Norma Castro; Susan F Tapert Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Tam T Nguyen-Louie; Kelly E Courtney; Lindsay M Squeglia; Kara Bagot; Sonja Eberson; Robyn Migliorini; Alexis R Alcaraz; Susan F Tapert; Carmen Pulido Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Lindsay M Squeglia; Nathaniel L Baker; Erin A McClure; Rachel L Tomko; Vitria Adisetiyo; Kevin M Gray Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Tam T Nguyen-Louie; Ashley Tracas; Lindsay M Squeglia; Georg E Matt; Sonja Eberson-Shumate; Susan F Tapert Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 3.455