Literature DB >> 26401709

Lateral Temporal Lobe: An Early Imaging Marker of the Presymptomatic GRN Disease?

Paola Caroppo1,2,3,4,5, Marie-Odile Habert6,7, Stanley Durrleman1,2,3,4,8, Aurélie Funkiewiez2,9,10, Vincent Perlbarg1,2,3,4,6,11, Valérie Hahn10, Hugo Bertin6,12, Malo Gaubert6,12, Alexandre Routier1,2,3,4,8,12, Didier Hannequin13, Vincent Deramecourt14, Florence Pasquier14, Sophie Rivaud-Pechoux1,2,3,4, Martine Vercelletto15, Geoffrey Edouart1,2,3,4,16, Romain Valabregue1,2,3,4,17, Pascal Lejeune18, Mira Didic19, Jean-Christophe Corvol1,2,3,4,16,20, Habib Benali6, Stephane Lehericy1,2,3,4,17, Bruno Dubois1,2,3,4,9,10,20, Olivier Colliot1,2,3,4,8, Alexis Brice1,2,3,4,20,21, Isabelle Le Ber1,2,3,4,10,20.   

Abstract

The preclinical stage of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is not well characterized. We conducted a brain metabolism (FDG-PET) and structural (cortical thickness) study to detect early changes in asymptomatic GRN mutation carriers (aGRN+) that were evaluated longitudinally over a 20-month period. At baseline, a left lateral temporal lobe hypometabolism was present in aGRN+ without any structural changes. Importantly, this is the first longitudinal study and, across time, the metabolism more rapidly decreased in aGRN+ in lateral temporal and frontal regions. The main structural change observed in the longitudinal study was a reduction of cortical thickness in the left lateral temporal lobe in carriers. A limit of this study is the relatively small sample (n = 16); nevertheless, it provides important results. First, it evidences that the pathological processes develop a long time before clinical onset, and that early neuroimaging changes might be detected approximately 20 years before the clinical onset of disease. Second, it suggests that metabolic changes are detectable before structural modifications and cognitive deficits. Third, both the baseline and longitudinal studies provide converging results implicating lateral temporal lobe as early involved in GRN disease. Finally, our study demonstrates that structural and metabolic changes could represent possible biomarkers to monitor the progression of disease in the presymptomatic stage toward clinical onset.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical thickness; GRN; PET; dementia; frontotemporal dementia; frontotemporal lobar degeneration; longitudinal; preclinical study; presymptomatic; progranulin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26401709      PMCID: PMC4923734          DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


INTRODUCTION

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are rare neurodegenerative disorders characterized by behavioral changes and language deficits. Mutations of the GRN (progranulin) gene, all leading to progranulin haploinsufficiency, are responsible for 25% of familial cases. The prevalent clinical phenotype of GRN patients is behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Primary progressive non-fluent aphasia and corticobasal syndrome are less common presenting phenotypes [1, 2]. Neuroimaging pattern of GRN carriers is characterized by asymmetrical fronto-temporal-parietal atrophy [3, 4]. So far, it is not known how long structural and functional changes occur before the clinical onset of FTLD disease. It is expected that biological alterations and morphological changes leading to dementia could occur decades before the first symptoms of FTLD, as demonstrated in other genetic forms of dementias such as Alzheimer’s disease [5]. Establishing how long these brain changes precede the clinical onset and their chronology during the presymptomatic stage is crucial because therapeutics such as HDAC inhibitors or amiodarone [6-8] are currently being developed to compensate progranulin haploinsufficiency. In this study, we performed a multimodal approach to investigate the chronology of brain structural and metabolic changes in a cohort of asymptomatic GRN carriers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Forty-three neurologically healthy individuals with 50% risk to carry a GRN mutation (first degree relatives of GRN carriers from 15 unrelated families) were recruited in four French centers over a 3-years period (2011 to 2013). All participants have signed informed consent for the study that was approved by the Ethics Committee of ‘Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris’. At inclusion, asymptomatic status was ascertained based on relative’s interview, neurological examination and the normality of scores of behavioral scales and neuropsychological tests (Supplementary Methods 2, Supplementary Table 1). Three participants presented cognitive impairment at neuropsychological evaluation and were considered as ‘cognitively symptomatic non dementia’ (CSND); therefore, they were excluded from the analyses. Additionally, 7 were also excluded from analyses because they did not undergo the full protocol, or because of the discovery of coincidental lesions on brain MRI a posteriori. Finally, 33 healthy individuals were included in the analyses. GRN sequencing revealed that sixteen asymptomatic participants carried GRN mutation (aGRN+, see Supplementary Table 2 for the list of mutations); the 17 participants who did not carry mutation (GRN−) were used as control group. The characteristics of aGRN+ and GRN− groups are summarized in the Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1. There were no statistical differences in age at examination, gender composition, and educational level between the two groups (Table 1, Supplementary Methods 1). The 33 subjects underwent standard MRI and FDG-PET study at baseline (T0); all except 5 underwent a second evaluation 20 months later (T20) with the same cognitive and neuroimaging protocol (14 GRN carriers, 14 non-carriers, n = 28) (Table 1). Five participants (2 carriers, 3 non-carriers) refused to be reevaluated and dropped out the study. Baseline and longitudinal statistical analyses were performed for brain structural MRI and metabolism, as described below. The participants were age- and gender-matched for the analyses at each time points (Table 1). We estimated the distance from the age of clinical onset in aGRN+ by subtracting the age at examination to the mean age at onset in the family.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of GRN carriers (aGRN+) and controls (GRN−)

Baseline visit (T0)Follow-up visit (T20)
Genetic status aGRN+ GRN− p-value aGRN+ GRN− p-value
Number of cases16171414
Gender Male/Female4/126/114/105/9
Education level (mean score)2.7±0.52.8±0.50.8
Age at examination,41.9±8.240±8.30.843±7.942.1±9.00.9
   years (range)(27–58)(27–60)(28–59)(29–51)
Duration T0–T20, months19.5±220.0±6.20.9
Distance to estimated age at20±10
   onset, years (range)(7–34)

Means ± SD are reported. Significant p-value <0.05. Educational level has been scored as follow: score 1 (5–8 years of study); score 2 (9–12 years); score 3 (>12 years).

MRI protocols

MRI acquisition

MRIs were acquired with 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla scanners according to the scanner available in each center. All centers used the same MRI sequences protocol that was designed and optimized to minimize centers bias. Prior to the study, phantom acquisitions were performed in order to ensure the comparability of the results across centers. The same proportion of carriers and of non-carriers was investigated in each center, and baseline and follow-up MRIs were performed on the same scanners for each participant. High-resolution three-dimensional T1-weighted images were acquired with full brain coverage and isotropic voxels (TR: 2300 ms; TE: 4,18 ms; matrix = 256 mm; slice thickness = 1 mm).

Cortical thickness analysis

Cortical thickness analyses were performed on T1-weighted 3D images using Freesurfer software (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). Briefly, T1-weighted 3D images were preprocessed with intensity variations correction, normalization, affine registration to the Talairach atlas, skull stripping, and segmentation of grey and white matter. The pipeline for longitudinal processing has been used that includes the creation of an unbiased within-subject template using robust, inverse consistent registration [9]. For cortical thickness, we used surface-based analysis of thickness values at each vertex. Surface-based analyses of cortical thickness were performed using Surfstat software (http://www.math.mcgill.ca/keith/surfstat/) following the methodology previously used [10]. Cortical thickness maps were smoothed using a 20 mm surface-based kernel. The comparison of baseline cortical thickness between groups was carried out using a two-sample t-test at each vertex. For longitudinal analyses, a paired t-test was used. Statistics were corrected for multiple comparisons using the random field theory for non-isotropic images [11]. A statistical threshold of p <  0.005 was first applied (height threshold). An extent threshold of p <  0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons was then applied at the cluster level.

Positon emission tomography protocols

18Fluorodeoxyglucose positon emission tomography (18FDG-PET) scans were acquired in four departments of nuclear medicine with a standardized protocol. Phantom acquisitions were performed prior to the study in order to measure the spatial resolution (FWHM) of each scanner. A dose of 2 MBq/Kg of fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) was injected 30 to 45 min prior to an acquisition of 15 min. Patients rested in quiet surroundings with the eyes closed at least 20 min post-injection. Follow-up scans were performed on the same tomograph as the baseline, with the same protocol. PET volumes were co-registered to their corresponding MRI volumes. MRI volumes were segmented into grey matter and white matter probability maps and spatially normalized to MNI space using SPM8. PET co-registered images were spatially normalized applying the transformation parameters of MRI normalization. Individual variability was taken into account by dividing for each subject voxel uptake by the mean pons uptake, yielding parametric images. Pons uptake was obtained from a Pickatlas (http://fmri.wfubmc.edu/software/pickatlas) region of interest. Parametric images were smoothed using an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 12 mm. Voxel-by-voxel comparison between carriers and non-carriers was then performed with a two-sample T-test on smoothed parametric images using an explicit mask. This mask was obtained from the mean of grey matter probability maps of each subject included in this analysis, with a threshold of 0.4. Age, gender, and tomograph spatial resolution were used as covariates. MarsBaR toolbox in SPM8 was used to extract [18F]FDG-uptake adjusted values from significant clusters. The method used to analyze the longitudinal data has been adapted from the one previously described by Fouquet et al. [12]. The follow-up MRI was co-registered to the baseline MRI, and a mean image was calculated. This mean image was used to calculate optimal transformation parameters to MNI space. Next, baseline and follow-up PET images were co-registered to the baseline MRI, spatially normalized to MNI using optimal transformation previously calculated, scaled with mean pons uptake, and smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 4 mm. Individual percent annual changes maps or “PET-PAC” were then calculated. These maps represent the voxel-wise calculation of percent metabolic change over the 20-month follow-up period (i.e., the difference between follow-up and baseline scaled PET value divided by baseline PET value x 100) expressed in annual percent change. A voxel-by-voxel comparison of PET-PAC between carriers and non-carriers was then performed after a second smoothing of the individual PET-PAC maps with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 10 mm, and using a mask obtained with the same method as for the cross-sectional analysis. All results are reported with p-value <0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons with an extent threshold k corresponding to the expected number of voxels per cluster. Differences in spatially normalized FDG-PET scans obtained with scanners of different resolutions were minimized by the following measures: i) restricting the analysis to voxels with intensity 80% greater than the whole-brain mean, and ii) excluding voxels from the uppermost 10 slices (i.e., from the top 22.5 mm of the brain) and from the lowermost 5 slices, where significant inter-scanner effects due to different fields of view have been reported [13].

RESULTS

Groups did not differ for gender, age at examination (p = 0.8), age at follow-up (p = 0.9). The mean estimated distance to the age at clinical onset was 20±10 years in aGRN+ (Table 1).

Cortical thickness

At baseline, no significant difference was found for cortical thickness between aGRN+ and GRN−. At follow-up a reduction of cortical thickness was found in one cluster in the left middle (1607 voxels) and inferior (554 voxels) temporal gyri (Fig. 1) in aGRN+, with peak in the left middle temporal gyrus (p <  0.05, cluster-corrected).
Fig.1

Cluster with significant cortical thickness changes in aGRN+ between the two time-points (p <  0.05 corrected). L, left; R, right.

18Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET

At baseline a left middle temporal gyrus hypometabolism (183 voxels; MNI coordinates x =−50; y =−40; z =−2) was present in aGRN+ compared to GRN- (p <  0.001 uncorrected) (Fig. 2). The longitudinal analysis revealed areas of greater metabolism decrease (p <  0.001, uncorrected) in aGRN+ compared to GRN− in the left inferior temporal, left middle frontal, left inferior orbital frontal, right superior orbital frontal gyri as well as in the left thalamus (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 4). Mean and maximal percent annualized change values in the regions represented in Fig. 3 are given in Supplementary Table 4.
Fig.2

a) At baseline PET-FDG hypometabolism in aGRN+ compared to GRN- (p <  0.001 uncorrected). L, left; R, right. b) The plot of the adjusted values of [18F]FDG uptake in the cluster is reported. Horizontal line corresponds to the median. GRN−: non carriers, aGRN+: asymptomatic GRN mutation carriers.

Fig.3

Regions of greater percentage of annualized changes of metabolism in aGRN+ compared to GRN− (p <  0.001 uncorrected). L, left; R, right (see Supplementary Table 4 for MNI coordinates and for values).

DISCUSSION

The major neuroanatomical signature of GRN disease in symptomatic patients carrying mutations is an asymmetric involvement of the inferior frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions [1, 3, 4]. A recent study also demonstrated that the most important annual percentage change of atrophy occurs in temporal lobe (lateral, polar), parietal (lateral, posterior) lobes, and insula in GRN symptomatic patients, compared to all other genotypes [14]. In this study, we have evaluated the presymptomatic phase of GRN disease. We have conducted a multimodal analysis combining two neuroimaging approaches to evaluate the chronology of structural and metabolic brain changes occurring during the presymptomatic phase in GRN carriers. The mean distance from estimated age at onset in our series (20±10 years) is longer than in most other studies (7 to 12 years, Supplementary Table 5) and allows detecting very early changes. We also evaluated the progression of brain changes across time in a longitudinal study. Importantly, this is the first longitudinal study conducted in GRN disease. In most studies, the progression in presymptomatic stage of dementia is evaluated by correlating changes to the mean distance to clinical onset, estimated as the difference between age at examination and mean age at onset in a family [15-18]. This estimation can be easily applied in genetic diseases where age at onset is relatively stable within families, as in genetic forms of Alzheimer’s disease [5], but this approximation is less confident in GRN disease, where age at onset is highly variable within families. For this reason, we evaluated the progression of changes across time by longitudinal evaluation of presymptomatic GRN carriers, during a 20-month follow-up period. At baseline, the absence of structural changes measured by cortical thickness in this study is consistent with one other study [18]. These negative results might be explained by the long distance to clinical onset. Otherwise, this method might be not sensitive enough to detect small effects in small groups of asymptomatic individuals. Only one cross-sectional study performed by Pievani et al. demonstrated reduced cortical thickness in five GRN carriers in the orbitofrontal cortex, middle frontal and precentral gyri that are not completely consistent with our results at baseline [19]. These inconsistencies might be due the age at examination that is higher than in our study, the population is thus closer to clinical onset, and to the sample size of carriers which is smaller than our cohort, possibly explaining different results at baseline. Furthermore, statistical methodology in our study is less liberal than that used by Pievani et al. and shall minimize the report of false positive findings. This may also explain why Pievani et al reported differences in a smaller group of carriers while we did not find significant differences at baseline. Importantly, even if no changes were present at baseline in our study, the cortical thickness reduced across time at follow-up in our aGRN+ individuals in lateral temporal lobe, in particular in the left middle and inferior temporal gyri. Notably, accordingly with our results, cortical thickness decreased faster with aging in the same regions in GRN carriers in another study [18]. Our results indicate that a comparison across time might be an appropriate method to detect affected brain regions during the presymptomatic stage. Hypometabolism was present at baseline in GRN carriers and was initially limited to the left middle temporal region. Unexpectedly, frontal lobes were not involved at baseline, although another metabolism study in aGRN+ carriers [17] found diffuse hypometabolism in frontal lobes. In the latter study, however, half of 9 carriers were cognitively symptomatic, which might explain less selective impairment at a later stage of disease progression. These inconsistencies can also be partially related to different methodologies used in the two studies. Conversely, our follow-up evaluation evidenced a rapid metabolism decrease in aGRN+ involving the frontal lobe (left middle, orbital) in addition to the inferior temporal gyrus and thalamus. Our results suggest that metabolic abnormalities, detectable at baseline, could predate the structural changes, and be one of the earliest predictor of the pathological process. It also suggests that temporal lobe might be initially more susceptible to the pathological process which secondarily progress to the frontal cortex. Finally, both our baseline and longitudinal studies provide converging results implicating the lateral temporal lobe as one of the earliest regions involved in GRN disease. Other studies [15, 20] also indicate that temporal areas could be noticeably impaired, before the frontal regions. A recent European study in a large cohort of aGRN+ carriers demonstrates that temporal atrophy is detec table 15 years before estimated clinical onset, before frontal involvement [21]. Consequently, one might hypothesize a dynamic model of the presymptomatic stage of GRN disease where temporal areas, involved many years before the clinical onset, could be the ‘epicenter’ of the pathological seeds, that might progress later toward frontal and/or parietal regions. The left middle temporal gyrus, which is early and consistently involved in this study, is implicated in language and semantic processing as well as in the recognition and retrieval of semantic information [22]. The involvement of this region fits well with clinical presentation of language disorders, especially agrammatic/nonfluent variant of FTD, characterizing a subset of GRN patients [1, 3]. The lateral temporal lobe also plays a role in theory of mind [23] that is one of the first detectable cognitive deficits in the early stage of FTD, and that significantly decreases in GRN carriers approaching the age of onset of the disease [16]. A more rapid metabolic decrease was also detected in the thalamus, a key node in the prefrontal-basal ganglia circuits, as well as in the prefrontal cortex. Interestingly, thalamic atrophy is more frequently detected in symptomatic GRN carriers than in other FTD subtypes [24], and already detected in the presymptomatic stage of FTD [21]. Both thalamus and the prefrontal cortex generate and control goal-directed behaviors [25, 26] and are implicated in apathy, one of the predominant clinical symptom of FTD. Studies in GRN presymptomatic carriers have some limitations. First, clinical heterogeneity of GRN disease, reflecting variable topography of lesions at onset, can diminish robustness of changes detection in presymptomatic carriers. Moreover, subtle changes detected during the presymptomatic stage, could also vary according to methodological approaches. Finally, disease-specific markers are not available in FTLD, thus possibly delaying the detection of presymptomatic changes in this pathology. However, our study provides important results. First, it evidences that the pathological process develop a long time before clinical onset in GRN carriers, and that early metabolic changes might be detected approximately 20 years before estimated disease onset. Second, it shows that metabolic changes are detectable before structural modifications and cognitive deficits that possibly appear in a shorter delay from the clinical onset. Finally, our study contributes to demonstrate that structural and metabolic changes could represent possible biomarkers to monitor the progression of disease in the presymptomatic stage toward the clinical onset. Click here for additional data file.
  26 in total

Review 1.  Apathy and the functional anatomy of the prefrontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits.

Authors:  Richard Levy; Bruno Dubois
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Brain atrophy over time in genetic and sporadic frontotemporal dementia: a study of 198 serial magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  J L Whitwell; B F Boeve; S D Weigand; M L Senjem; J L Gunter; M C Baker; M DeJesus-Hernandez; D S Knopman; Z K Wszolek; R C Petersen; R Rademakers; C R Jack; K A Josephs
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.089

3.  Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (vorinostat) up-regulates progranulin transcription: rational therapeutic approach to frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Basar Cenik; Chantelle F Sephton; Colleen M Dewey; Xunde Xian; Shuguang Wei; Kimberley Yu; Wenze Niu; Giovanni Coppola; Sarah E Coughlin; Suzee E Lee; Daniel R Dries; Sandra Almeida; Daniel H Geschwind; Fen-Biao Gao; Bruce L Miller; Robert V Farese; Bruce A Posner; Gang Yu; Joachim Herz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structural and functional brain connectivity in presymptomatic familial frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Elise G P Dopper; Serge A R B Rombouts; Lize C Jiskoot; Tom den Heijer; J Roos A de Graaf; Inge de Koning; Anke R Hammerschlag; Harro Seelaar; William W Seeley; Ilya M Veer; Mark A van Buchem; Patrizia Rizzu; John C van Swieten
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Mutations in progranulin (GRN) within the spectrum of clinical and pathological phenotypes of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  John C van Swieten; Peter Heutink
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 6.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.

Authors:  Nina F Dronkers; David P Wilkins; Robert D Van Valin; Brenda B Redfern; Jeri J Jaeger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

7.  Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Tammaryn Lashley; Jonathan M Schott; Jane E Warren; Simon Mead; Adrian M Isaacs; Jonathan Beck; John Hardy; Rohan de Silva; Elizabeth Warrington; Claire Troakes; Safa Al-Sarraj; Andrew King; Barbara Borroni; Matthew J Clarkson; Sebastien Ourselin; Janice L Holton; Nick C Fox; Tamas Revesz; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Neuroimaging signatures of frontotemporal dementia genetics: C9ORF72, tau, progranulin and sporadics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Whitwell; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley F Boeve; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Nicola J Rutherford; Matthew Baker; David S Knopman; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Ronald C Petersen; Rosa Rademakers; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Subcortical and Deep Cortical Atrophy in Frontotemporal Dementia due to Granulin Mutations.

Authors:  Enrico Premi; Valentina Garibotto; Stefano Gazzina; Anna Formenti; Silvana Archetti; Roberto Gasparotti; Alessandro Padovani; Barbara Borroni
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2014-04-23

10.  Targeted manipulation of the sortilin-progranulin axis rescues progranulin haploinsufficiency.

Authors:  Wing C Lee; Sandra Almeida; Mercedes Prudencio; Thomas R Caulfield; Yong-Jie Zhang; William M Tay; Peter O Bauer; Jeannie Chew; Hiroki Sasaguri; Karen R Jansen-West; Tania F Gendron; Caroline T Stetler; NiCole Finch; Ian R Mackenzie; Rosa Rademakers; Fen-Biao Gao; Leonard Petrucelli
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  12 in total

1.  The inner fluctuations of the brain in presymptomatic Frontotemporal Dementia: The chronnectome fingerprint.

Authors:  Enrico Premi; Vince D Calhoun; Matteo Diano; Stefano Gazzina; Maura Cosseddu; Antonella Alberici; Silvana Archetti; Donata Paternicò; Roberto Gasparotti; John van Swieten; Daniela Galimberti; Raquel Sanchez-Valle; Robert Laforce; Fermin Moreno; Matthis Synofzik; Caroline Graff; Mario Masellis; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; James Rowe; Rik Vandenberghe; Elizabeth Finger; Fabrizio Tagliavini; Alexandre de Mendonça; Isabel Santana; Chris Butler; Simon Ducharme; Alex Gerhard; Adrian Danek; Johannes Levin; Markus Otto; Giovanni Frisoni; Stefano Cappa; Sandro Sorbi; Alessandro Padovani; Jonathan D Rohrer; Barbara Borroni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Neuroimaging in genetic frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Suvi Häkkinen; Stephanie A Chu; Suzee E Lee
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Trajectory of lobar atrophy in asymptomatic and symptomatic GRN mutation carriers: a longitudinal MRI study.

Authors:  Qin Chen; Bradley F Boeve; Matthew Senjem; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Timothy Lesnick; Danielle Brushaber; Christina Dheel; Julie Fields; Leah Forsberg; Ralitza Gavrilova; Debra Gearhart; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Neill Graff-Radford; Clifford R Jack; David Jones; David Knopman; Walter K Kremers; Maria Lapid; Rosa Rademakers; Eliana Marisa Ramos; Jeremy Syrjanen; Adam L Boxer; Howie Rosen; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Kejal Kantarci
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 4.  Pre-symptomatic radiological changes in frontotemporal dementia: propagation characteristics, predictive value and implications for clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Clare McKenna; Jasmin Lope; Ee Ling Tan; Peter Bede
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.224

5.  Patterns of gray matter atrophy in genetic frontotemporal dementia: results from the GENFI study.

Authors:  David M Cash; Martina Bocchetta; David L Thomas; Katrina M Dick; John C van Swieten; Barbara Borroni; Daniela Galimberti; Mario Masellis; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; James B Rowe; Caroline Graff; Fabrizio Tagliavini; Giovanni B Frisoni; Robert Laforce; Elizabeth Finger; Alexandre de Mendonça; Sandro Sorbi; Martin N Rossor; Sebastien Ourselin; Jonathan D Rohrer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Longitudinal structural gray matter and white matter MRI changes in presymptomatic progranulin mutation carriers.

Authors:  Christopher A Olm; Corey T McMillan; David J Irwin; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Philip A Cook; James C Gee; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Longitudinal multimodal MRI as prognostic and diagnostic biomarker in presymptomatic familial frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Lize C Jiskoot; Jessica L Panman; Lieke H Meeter; Elise G P Dopper; Laura Donker Kaat; Sanne Franzen; Emma L van der Ende; Rick van Minkelen; Serge A R B Rombouts; Janne M Papma; John C van Swieten
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  An update on genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Caroline V Greaves; Jonathan D Rohrer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Imaging and fluid biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Lieke H Meeter; Laura Donker Kaat; Jonathan D Rohrer; John C van Swieten
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Rates of Brain Atrophy Across Disease Stages in Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Associated With MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 Pathogenic Variants.

Authors:  Adam M Staffaroni; Sheng-Yang M Goh; Yann Cobigo; Elise Ong; Suzee E Lee; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Amy Wolf; Leah K Forsberg; Nupur Ghoshal; Neill R Graff-Radford; Murray Grossman; Hilary W Heuer; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Kejal Kantarci; David S Knopman; Walter K Kremers; Ian R Mackenzie; Bruce L Miller; Otto Pedraza; Katya Rascovsky; M Carmela Tartaglia; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Joel H Kramer; John Kornak; Bradley F Boeve; Adam L Boxer; Howard J Rosen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.