Literature DB >> 26401105

Diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and its correlation with serum cancer antigen-125 (CA125) in a large cohort of ovarian cancer patients.

Laura Evangelista1, Maurizia Dalla Palma2, Michele Gregianin1, Margherita Nardin3, Anna Roma2, Maria Ornella Nicoletto2, Giovanni Battista Nardelli4, Vittorina Zagonel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in recurrent disease, response to therapy, and long-term follow-up of ovarian cancer (OC) patients in relation to cancer antigen-125 (CA125) levels and the prognostic meaning of this modality in this subset of subjects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 125 patients affected by OC who underwent FDG PET/CT imaging at our institution. The indications for PET/CT were recurrence of disease in 78 patients, therapy response assessment in 29, and follow-up in 18. The results of FDG PET/CT were compared with those of histopathology and clinical and radiological progression during follow-up for at least 6 months. The median long-term follow-up was 33 months. The diagnostic accuracies for the different clinical settings were evaluated. The relationships among global survival (GS), FDG PET/CT results, and CA125 levels were evaluated by both Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: CA125 results were positive (>35 UI/mL) in 62 patients and negative in 63 (49% vs. 51%). The sensitivity and specificity of CA125 were 72% and 91%, respectively. PET/CT imaging showed a sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 77.8% for the assessment of recurrent disease, and a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 88.9% for therapy evaluation. Meanwhile, in 18 patients evaluated during follow-up, the specificity was 82.3%. GS was significantly higher in case of negative CA125 values at the time of FDG PET/CT, of a negative PET/CT scan and when no evidence of peritoneum recurrence and distant metastases was determined by PET. Multivariate regression analysis showed that only age and peritoneum recurrence as determined by PET were identified as independent predictors of poor prognosis.
CONCLUSION: Metabolic imaging with FDG PET/CT proved useful in patients where OC recurrence was suspected, even when the value of tumor marker CA125 was in a normal range. A positive PET/CT scan and the presence of peritoneum recurrence at PET were associated with a poor prognosis after approximately 30 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA125; FDG-PET/CT; Ovarian cancer; disease-free survival; overall survival

Year:  2015        PMID: 26401105      PMCID: PMC4560469          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  24 in total

1.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Norbert Avril; Stefanie Sassen; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Joerg Naehrig; Stephan Rutke; Wolfgang A Weber; Martin Werner; Henner Graeff; Markus Schwaiger; Walther Kuhn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The diagnostic value of PET/CT for primary ovarian cancer--a prospective study.

Authors:  Signe Risum; Claus Høgdall; Annika Loft; Anne K Berthelsen; Estrid Høgdall; Lotte Nedergaard; Lene Lundvall; Svend A Engelholm
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer in the setting of normal CA-125 levels.

Authors:  Priya Bhosale; Silanath Peungjesada; Wei Wei; Charles F Levenback; Kathleen Schmeler; Eric Rohren; Homer A Macapinlac; Revathy B Iyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125.

Authors:  G J Rustin; A E Nelstrop; P McClean; M F Brady; W P McGuire; W J Hoskins; H Mitchell; H E Lambert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Role of FDG PET/CT in staging of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hongju Son; Shahid M Khan; Jamal Rahaman; Katherine L Cameron; Monica Prasad-Hayes; Linus Chuang; Josef Machac; Sherif Heiba; Lale Kostakoglu
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Clinical value of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: is there an impact of FDG PET/CT on patient management?

Authors:  Ahmet Bilici; Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Mesut Seker; Nesrin Canpolat; Bulent Tekinsoy; Taflan Salepci; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Recurrent ovarian cancer: use of contrast-enhanced CT and PET/CT to accurately localize tumor recurrence and to predict patients' survival.

Authors:  Evis Sala; Masako Kataoka; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Nicole Ishill; Svetlana Mironov; Chaya S Moskowitz; Oleg Mironov; Michelle A Collins; Dennis S Chi; Steven Larson; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Integrated FDG PET/CT in patients with persistent ovarian cancer: correlation with histologic findings.

Authors:  Sandro Sironi; Cristina Messa; Giorgia Mangili; Barbara Zangheri; Giovanni Aletti; Elisabetta Garavaglia; Riccardo Vigano; Maria Picchio; Gianluca Taccagni; Alessandro Del Maschio; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Impact of FDG PET-CT imaging on the decision making in the biologic suspicion of ovarian carcinoma recurrence.

Authors:  Michael Soussan; Myriam Wartski; Pascal Cherel; Emmanuelle Fourme; Alain Goupil; Elise Le Stanc; Nasrine Callet; Jérôme Alexandre; Alain-Paul Pecking; Jean-Louis Alberini
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic performance of PET/CT and PET/MR in the management of ovarian carcinoma-a literature review.

Authors:  Mayur Virarkar; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Anjalie Tara Gulati; Sarah Palmquist; Revathy Iyer; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-11

2.  EANM guideline on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostic value, therapy assessment and restaging of ovarian cancer, endorsed by the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Authors:  Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Nicolas Aide; Patrick M Colletti; Annamaria Ferrero; Diana Paez; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Evaluation of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer before primary treatment: correlation between tumour burden assessed by [18F]FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters and tumour markers HE4 and CA125.

Authors:  Ariel Glickman; Pilar Paredes; Núria Carreras-Diéguez; Aida Niñerola-Baizán; Lydia Gaba; Jaume Pahisa; Pere Fusté; Marta Del Pino; Berta Díaz-Feijóo; Eduardo González-Bosquet; Núria Agustí; Nuria Sánchez-Izquierdo; David Fuster; Andrés Perissinotti; Inmaculada Romero; Esther Fernández-Galán; Josep Lluís Carrasco; Blanca Gil-Ibáñez; Aureli Torné
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 4.  Systematic Review on the Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: Is Functional Information Really Needed?

Authors:  Subapriya Suppiah; Wing Liong Chang; Hasyma Abu Hassan; Chalermrat Kaewput; Andi Anggeriana Andi Asri; Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad; Abdul Jalil Nordin; Sobhan Vinjamuri
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CA125, serum levels and kinetic parameters, in early detection of ovarian cancer recurrence: Influence of histological subtypes and tumor stages.

Authors:  Azahara Palomar Muñoz; José Manuel Cordero García; Mª Del Prado Talavera Rubio; Ana Mª García Vicente; Francisco José Pena Pardo; Germán Andrés Jiménez Londoño; Ángel Soriano Castrejón; Enrique Aranda Aguilar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Posttreatment FDG PET/CT in predicting survival of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Linda C Chu; Hua-Ling Tsai; Hao Wang; John Crandall; Mehrbod S Javadi; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.138

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.