Literature DB >> 26396428

Correlation between ethanol stress and cellular fatty acid composition of alcohol producing non-Saccharomyces in comparison with Saccharomyces cerevisiae by multivariate techniques.

K M Archana1, R Ravi2, K A Anu-Appaiah1.   

Abstract

Wine production is a complex process both from biochemical and microbiological point of view in which yeast plays a central role. The use of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non- Saccharomyces yeasts as mixed starter cultures for wine fermentations is of increasing interest to enhance the quality of wine.The most common stress, yeast cells encounter during wine fermentation is the increase in ethanol concentration.To enhance ethanol tolerance, alteration in the cellular lipid composition is one of its defence mechanism. Ethanol tolerance and cellular fatty acid composition of alcohol producing non Saccharomyces forms were compared with enological strains of Sacccharomyces cerevisiae. Saccharomyces cerevisiae used for the study, tolerated 15 % of ethanol and the non Saccharomyces strains such as, Issatchenkia occidentalis and Issatchenkia orientalis tolerated 10 % of ethanol. On exposure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol stress, the proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids increased with concomitant decrease in saturated fatty acids. Decrease in monounsaturated fatty acids, exhibited by non-Saccharomyces yeasts when exposed to ethanol stress, could be one of the reasons for their inability to withstand more than 10 % of alcohol. Multivariate techniques of data analysis - principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis were employed in order to establish differentiation criteria as function of yeast strains, alcohol stress and their fatty acid profile. Based on the data, Chemometrics, such as principal component analysis and discriminant function analysis, can be successfully applied to fatty acid data to categorize the yeast.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemometrics; Ethanol stress; Lipid composition; Yeasts

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396428      PMCID: PMC4573097          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-015-1762-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  16 in total

1.  Separation of biologically active lipids from red wine.

Authors:  E Fragopoulou; T Nomikos; S Antonopoulou; C A Mitsopoulou; C A Demopoulos
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Characterization of yeast strains for wine production: effect of fermentation variables on quality of wine produced.

Authors:  R N Ndip; J F Akoachere; L L Dopgima; L M Ndip
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.926

3.  Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Francesca Comitini; Mirko Gobbi; Paola Domizio; Cristina Romani; Livio Lencioni; Ilaria Mannazzu; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.516

Review 4.  Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Menggen Ma; Z Lewis Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Relationship between ethanol tolerance, H+ -ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains.

Authors:  F Aguilera; R A Peinado; C Millán; J M Ortega; J C Mauricio
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Ethanol production and maximum cell growth are highly correlated with membrane lipid composition during fermentation as determined by lipidomic analysis of 22 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Clark M Henderson; Michelle Lozada-Contreras; Vladimir Jiranek; Marjorie L Longo; David E Block
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Junmei Ding; Xiaowei Huang; Lemin Zhang; Na Zhao; Dongmei Yang; Keqin Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Relationship between ethanol tolerance, lipid composition and plasma membrane fluidity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata.

Authors:  H Alexandre; I Rousseaux; C Charpentier
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains during adaptation to unfavourable conditions of fermentation on synthetic medium: cell lipid composition, membrane integrity, viability and fermentative activity.

Authors:  Ilaria Mannazzu; Daniele Angelozzi; Simona Belviso; Marilena Budroni; Giovanni Antonio Farris; Paola Goffrini; Tiziana Lodi; Mario Marzona; Laura Bardi
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  A higher spirit: avoiding yeast suicide during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  D Carmona-Gutierrez; C Sommer; A Andryushkova; G Kroemer; F Madeo
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.067

View more
  6 in total

1.  Protein kinases Elm1 and Sak1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exerted different functions under high-glucose and heat shock stresses.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Xu Yang; Huan-Yuan Jiang; Ze-Ming Song; Xue Lin; Xiao-Ping Hu; Cong-Fa Li
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Species-Dependent Metabolic Response to Lipid Mixtures in Wine Yeasts.

Authors:  Lethiwe L Mbuyane; Florian F Bauer; Audrey Bloem; Carole Camarasa; Anne Ortiz-Julien; Benoit Divol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Transcriptome profiling of Issatchenkia orientalis under ethanol stress.

Authors:  Yingjie Miao; Guotong Xiong; Ruoyun Li; Zufang Wu; Xin Zhang; Peifang Weng
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Enhanced multi-stress tolerance and glucose utilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the SNF1 gene and varied beta isoform of Snf1 dominates in stresses.

Authors:  Lu Meng; Hui-Ling Liu; Xue Lin; Xiao-Ping Hu; Kun-Ru Teng; Si-Xin Liu
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Proteomic profiling and integrated analysis with transcriptomic data bring new insights in the stress responses of Kluyveromyces marxianus after an arrest during high-temperature ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Pengsong Li; Xiaofen Fu; Ming Chen; Lei Zhang; Shizhong Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  DNA microarray of global transcription factor mutant reveals membrane-related proteins involved in n-butanol tolerance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Hai-Ming Si; Fa Zhang; An-Ning Wu; Rui-Zhi Han; Guo-Chao Xu; Ye Ni
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.040

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.