BACKGROUND: Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is associated with poor sustained virological response (SVR) in genotype 1, and data on genotype 3 is limited to small numbers. We report one of the largest series of genotype 3 patients treated for recurrent hepatitis C following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: From January 2002 to November 2013, of 1349 transplants, 359 patients had hepatitis C. Patients with histological recurrence were treated with pegylated interferon in escalating dose regimen for 48 weeks and weight-based ribavirin. Virological response was defined as rapid virological response (RVR-4 weeks), early virological response (EVR-12 weeks), end of treatment response (ETR-48 weeks), and SVR (24 weeks after end of treatment). SVR and no-SVR groups were compared for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, ferritin, genotype, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels before initiation of treatment. RESULTS: The study included 67 patients who had at least 18 months of follow up after treatment initiation (45 males), aged 51 ± 6.3 years. Treatment was started after 16 months (median); baseline median RNA was 2.7 × 10(6) IU/mL. There was no significant difference between the SVR and no-SVR groups regarding age, sex ratio, follow up period, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, BMI, prevalence of diabetes, HCV RNA, and ferritin levels. Genotype 3, RVR, EVR, ETR, and higher LDL levels were significantly associated with SVR. Genotype 3 had a significantly higher SVR rate of 71 % as compared to an SVR rate of only 14 % in genotype 1, p = 0.0003. Absence of RVR and EVR predicted treatment failure with a specificity of 88 % and 92 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: Genotype 3 and higher LDL levels predict SVR in patients treated for hepatitis C recurrence following LDLT, whereas absence of RVR and EVR strongly predict treatment failure.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is associated with poor sustained virological response (SVR) in genotype 1, and data on genotype 3 is limited to small numbers. We report one of the largest series of genotype 3 patients treated for recurrent hepatitis C following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: From January 2002 to November 2013, of 1349 transplants, 359 patients had hepatitis C. Patients with histological recurrence were treated with pegylated interferon in escalating dose regimen for 48 weeks and weight-based ribavirin. Virological response was defined as rapid virological response (RVR-4 weeks), early virological response (EVR-12 weeks), end of treatment response (ETR-48 weeks), and SVR (24 weeks after end of treatment). SVR and no-SVR groups were compared for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, ferritin, genotype, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels before initiation of treatment. RESULTS: The study included 67 patients who had at least 18 months of follow up after treatment initiation (45 males), aged 51 ± 6.3 years. Treatment was started after 16 months (median); baseline median RNA was 2.7 × 10(6) IU/mL. There was no significant difference between the SVR and no-SVR groups regarding age, sex ratio, follow up period, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, BMI, prevalence of diabetes, HCV RNA, and ferritin levels. Genotype 3, RVR, EVR, ETR, and higher LDL levels were significantly associated with SVR. Genotype 3 had a significantly higher SVR rate of 71 % as compared to an SVR rate of only 14 % in genotype 1, p = 0.0003. Absence of RVR and EVR predicted treatment failure with a specificity of 88 % and 92 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: Genotype 3 and higher LDL levels predict SVR in patients treated for hepatitis C recurrence following LDLT, whereas absence of RVR and EVR strongly predict treatment failure.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hepatitis C virus; Liver transplantation; Sustained virological response
Authors: Valentina Rosa Bertuzzo; Matteo Cescon; Maria Cristina Morelli; Paolo Di Gioia; Mariarosa Tamè; Stefania Lorenzini; Pietro Andreone; Giorgio Ercolani; Massimo Del Gaudio; Matteo Ravaioli; Alessandro Cucchetti; Alessandro Dazzi; Antonietta D'Errico-Grigioni; Antonio Daniele Pinna Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Stephen A Harrison; Lorenzo Rossaro; Ke-Qin Hu; Keyur Patel; Hans Tillmann; Sandeep Dhaliwal; Dawn M Torres; Kenneth Koury; Venkata S Goteti; Stephanie Noviello; Clifford A Brass; Janice K Albrecht; John G McHutchison; Mark S Sulkowski Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: M Berenguer; L Ferrell; J Watson; M Prieto; M Kim; M Rayón; J Córdoba; A Herola; N Ascher; J Mir; J Berenguer; T L Wright Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Ibrahim A Hanouneh; Charles Miller; Federico Aucejo; Rocio Lopez; Mary Kay Quinn; Nizar N Zein Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: E J Gane; B C Portmann; N V Naoumov; H M Smith; J A Underhill; P T Donaldson; G Maertens; R Williams Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-03-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marina Berenguer; Martín Prieto; Fernando San Juan; José M Rayón; Fernando Martinez; Domingo Carrasco; Angel Moya; Francisco Orbis; José Mir; Joaquín Berenguer Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: C Féray; D Samuel; V Thiers; M Gigou; F Pichon; A Bismuth; M Reynes; P Maisonneuve; H Bismuth; C Bréchot Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 14.808