Literature DB >> 26394650

Electrode modifications to lower electrode impedance and improve neural signal recording sensitivity.

T Chung1, J Q Wang, J Wang, B Cao, Y Li, S W Pang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although electrode size should be miniaturized to provide higher selectivity for neural signal recording and to avoid tissue damage, small sized electrodes induce high impedance, which decreases recording quality. In this work, the electrode surface was modified to increase the effective surface area to lower the electrode impedance and to improve the neural signal detection quality by optimizing plasma conditions. APPROACH: A tetrafluoromethane (CF4) plasma was used to increase the effective surface area of gold electrode sites of polyimide-based neural probes. In vitro electrode impedance and in vivo neural signal recording and stimulation were characterized. MAIN
RESULTS: For 15 μm diameter (dia.) electrode size, the average surface roughness could be increased from 1.7 to 22 nm after plasma treatment, and the electrode impedance was decreased by 98%. Averaged background noise power in the range of 1 to 1000 Hz was decreased to -106 dB after the 30 μm dia. electrodes were plasma modified-lower than the noise level of -86 dB without plasma treatment. Neural probes with plasma-modified electrode sites of 15 and 30 μm dia. were implanted to the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) region for acute recording of spontaneous and electrical evoked local field potential (LFP) of neural signals. Spontaneous LFP recorded in vivo by the plasma-modified electrodes of 30 μm dia. was two times higher compared to electrodes without treatment. For a stimulation current of 400 μA, electrically evoked LFP recorded by the plasma-modified electrodes was seven times higher than those without plasma exposure. SIGNIFICANCE: A controllable technology was developed to increase the effective surface area of electrodes using a CF4 plasma. Plasma-modified electrodes improved the quality of the neural probe recording and more sensitive to record spontaneous and evoked LFP in the ACC region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26394650     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/5/056018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biocompatible reference electrodes to enhance chronic electrochemical signal fidelity in vivo.

Authors:  Blake T Seaton; Michael L Heien
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  The Materials Science Foundation Supporting the Microfabrication of Reliable Polyimide-Metal Neuroelectronic Interfaces.

Authors:  Cary A Kuliasha; Jack W Judy
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-05-03

Review 3.  Neural Interfaces for Intracortical Recording: Requirements, Fabrication Methods, and Characteristics.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Szostak; Laszlo Grand; Timothy G Constandinou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  A Review: Electrode and Packaging Materials for Neurophysiology Recording Implants.

Authors:  Weiyang Yang; Yan Gong; Wen Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Electrochemical and biological performance of hierarchical platinum-iridium electrodes structured by a femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Linze Li; Changqing Jiang; Wanru Duan; Zhiyan Wang; Feng Zhang; Changgeng He; Tiangang Long; Luming Li
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 8.006

6.  In Vivo Neural Recording and Electrochemical Performance of Microelectrode Arrays Modified by Rough-Surfaced AuPt Alloy Nanoparticles with Nanoporosity.

Authors:  Zongya Zhao; Ruxue Gong; Liang Zheng; Jue Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Does Impedance Matter When Recording Spikes With Polytrodes?

Authors:  Joana P Neto; Pedro Baião; Gonçalo Lopes; João Frazão; Joana Nogueira; Elvira Fortunato; Pedro Barquinha; Adam R Kampff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  State-of-the-art MEMS and microsystem tools for brain research.

Authors:  John P Seymour; Fan Wu; Kensall D Wise; Euisik Yoon
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 7.127

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.