Literature DB >> 26394195

Predictors of late bowel toxicity using three different methods of contouring in patients undergoing post-operative radiation for cervical cancer.

Supriya Chopra1, Rahul Krishnatry2, Tapas Dora1, Sadhna Kannan3, Biji Thomas1, Supriya Sonawone1, Reena Engineer2, Siji Paul1, Reena Phurailatpam1, Umesh Mahantshetty2, Shyam Shrivastava2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the correlation between dose-volume histogram derived from three bowel contouring methods and late toxicity in patients undergoing post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) for cervical cancer.
METHODS: From June 2010 to May 2013, 103 patients undergoing PORT were included. Three different contouring methods were used: (a) individual small bowel (SB) and large bowel (LB) loops, (b) total bowel (TB; including SB and LB) and (c) peritoneal cavity (PC). The volume of SB, LB, TB and PC receiving 15, 30 and 40 Gy was calculated. Acute and late bowel toxicities were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events v. 3.0. Receiver operating characteristic curve identified thresholds predicting late toxicity with the highest specificity. All data were dichotomized across these thresholds. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS(®) v. 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY; formerly SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, V30 PC ≥ 900 cm(3) (p = 0.01), V40 PC ≥ 750 cm(3) (p = 0.03) and V40 TB ≥ 280 cm(3) (p = 0.03) and use of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.03) predicted grade ≥II acute toxicity. On multivariate analysis, use of concurrent chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-11.1, p = 0.03] and V30 PC ≥ 900 cm(3) (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1-5.5, p = 0.05) predicted acute grade ≥II toxicity. On univariate analysis for late toxicity, SB (V30 ≥ 190 cm(3), p = 0.009; V40 ≥ 150 cm(3), p = 0.03), LB (V15 ≥ 250 cm(3), p = 0.04), V40 PC (V40 ≥ 750 cm(3), p = 0.001) and presence of acute grade ≥III toxicity (p = 0.006), treatment technique (three-dimensional conformal radiation or intensity modulated radiotherapy, p = 0.02) predicted more than or equal to grade ll late bowel toxicity. On multivariate analysis, only body mass index ≥25 kg m(-2) (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.6-31.6, p = 0.008) and presence of acute grade III toxicity predicted toxicity (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.4-18.1, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: V30 PC ≥ 900 cm(3) and use of concurrent chemotherapy independently predicts acute toxicity. Presence of acute grade ≥III toxicity independently predicts late toxicity. Minimizing dose to PC subvolumes can therefore reduce both acute and late toxicities. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Study establishes PC thresholds that can minimize both acute and late bowel toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26394195      PMCID: PMC4743445          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

1.  Dose-volume histogram predictors of chronic gastrointestinal complications after radical hysterectomy and postoperative concurrent nedaplatin-based chemoradiation therapy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fumiaki Isohashi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Seiji Mabuchi; Koji Konishi; Masahiko Koizumi; Yutaka Takahashi; Toshiyuki Ogata; Shintaroh Maruoka; Tadashi Kimura; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the stomach and small bowel.

Authors:  Brian D Kavanagh; Charlie C Pan; Laura A Dawson; Shiva K Das; X Allen Li; Randall K Ten Haken; Moyed Miften
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Predicting grade 3 acute diarrhea during radiation therapy for rectal cancer using a cutoff-dose logistic regression normal tissue complication probability model.

Authors:  John M Robertson; Matthias Söhn; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Marvin Rotman; Alexander Sedlis; Marion R Piedmonte; Brian Bundy; Samuel S Lentz; Laila I Muderspach; Richard J Zaino
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A phase II study of intensity modulated radiation therapy to the pelvis for postoperative patients with endometrial carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group trial 0418.

Authors:  Anuja Jhingran; Kathryn Winter; Lorraine Portelance; Brigitte Miller; Mohammad Salehpour; Rakesh Gaur; Luis Souhami; William Small; Lawrence Berk; David Gaffney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas.

Authors:  Hiram A Gay; H Joseph Barthold; Elizabeth O'Meara; Walter R Bosch; Issam El Naqa; Rawan Al-Lozi; Seth A Rosenthal; Colleen Lawton; W Robert Lee; Howard Sandler; Anthony Zietman; Robert Myerson; Laura A Dawson; Christopher Willett; Lisa A Kachnic; Anuja Jhingran; Lorraine Portelance; Janice Ryu; William Small; David Gaffney; Akila N Viswanathan; Jeff M Michalski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The dose-volume relationship of acute small bowel toxicity from concurrent 5-FU-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kathy L Baglan; Robert C Frazier; Di Yan; Raywin R Huang; Alvaro A Martinez; John M Robertson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Predictors of grade 3 or higher late bowel toxicity in patients undergoing pelvic radiation for cervical cancer: results from a prospective study.

Authors:  Supriya Chopra; Tapas Dora; Anand N Chinnachamy; Biji Thomas; Sadhna Kannan; Reena Engineer; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Phurailatpam; Siji N Paul; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. Analysis of complications.

Authors:  C A Perez; S Breaux; J M Bedwinek; H Madoc-Jones; H M Camel; J A Purdy; B J Walz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Small bowel dose parameters predicting grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation: an independent validation study comparing peritoneal space versus small bowel loop contouring techniques.

Authors:  Robyn Banerjee; Santam Chakraborty; Ian Nygren; Richie Sinha
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.038

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Prospective validation of craniocaudal tumour size on MR imaging compared to histoPAthology in patients with uterine cervical cancer: The MPAC study.

Authors:  Peter de Boer; Anje M Spijkerboer; Maaike C G Bleeker; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Mélanie A Monraats; Aart J Nederveen; Marc J van de Vijver; Gemma G Kenter; Arjan Bel; Coen R N Rasch; Jaap Stoker; Lukas J A Stalpers
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-06-15

Review 2.  Contribution of Tata Memorial Centre, India, to cervical cancer care: Journey of two decades.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar; Supriya Chopra; Sudeep Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

3.  Target tailoring and proton beam therapy to reduce small bowel dose in cervical cancer radiotherapy : A comparison of benefits.

Authors:  Peter de Boer; Agustinus J A J van de Schoot; Henrike Westerveld; Mark Smit; Marrije R Buist; Arjan Bel; Coen R N Rasch; Lukas J A Stalpers
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Robust dose planning objectives for mesorectal radiotherapy of early stage rectal cancer - A multicentre dose planning study.

Authors:  Ane L Appelt; Ellen M Kerkhof; Lars Nyvang; Ernst C Harderwijk; Natalie L Abbott; Mark Teo; Femke P Peters; Camilla J S Kronborg; Karen-Lise G Spindler; David Sebag-Montefiore; Corrie A M Marijnen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Xiuhua Li; Tingting Lin; Fang Ma; Xiaoyu Ma; Xiaoli Wu; Yingming Sun; Xiaoge Sun
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.