Literature DB >> 11777636

The dose-volume relationship of acute small bowel toxicity from concurrent 5-FU-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Kathy L Baglan1, Robert C Frazier, Di Yan, Raywin R Huang, Alvaro A Martinez, John M Robertson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A direct relationship between the volume of small bowel irradiated and the degree of acute small bowel toxicity experienced during concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma is well recognized but poorly quantified. This study uses three-dimensional treatment-planning tools to more precisely quantify this dose-volume relationship. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients receiving concurrent 5-FU-based chemotherapy and pelvic irradiation for rectal carcinoma had treatment-planning CT scans with small bowel contrast. A median isocentric dose of 50.4 Gy was delivered using a posterior-anterior and opposed lateral field arrangement. Bowel exclusion techniques were routinely used, including prone treatment position on a vacuum bag cradle to allow anterior displacement of the abdominal contents and bladder distension. Individual loops of small bowel were contoured on each slice of the planning CT scan, and a small bowel dose-volume histogram was generated for the initial pelvis field receiving 45 Gy. The volume of small bowel receiving each dose between 5 and 40 Gy was recorded at 5-Gy intervals.
RESULTS: Ten patients (25%) experienced Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3+ acute small bowel toxicity. A highly statistically significant association between the development of Grade 3+ acute small bowel toxicity and the volume of small bowel irradiated was found at each dose level. Specific dose-volume threshold levels were found, below which no Grade 3+ toxicity occurred and above which 50-60% of patients developed Grade 3+ toxicity. The volume of small bowel receiving at least 15 Gy (V15) was strongly associated with the degree of toxicity. Univariate analysis of patient and treatment-related factors revealed no other significant predictors of severe toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: A strong dose-volume relationship exists for the development of Grade 3+ acute small bowel toxicity in patients receiving concurrent 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11777636     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01820-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  67 in total

1.  Evaluation of normal tissue exposure in patients receiving radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer based on RTOG 0848.

Authors:  Ted C Ling; Jerry M Slater; Rachel Mifflin; Prashanth Nookala; Roger Grove; Anh M Ly; Baldev Patyal; Jerry D Slater; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

2.  A treatment planning study of prone vs. supine positions for locally advanced rectal carcinoma : Comparison of 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sergiu Scobioala; Christopher Kittel; Philipp Niermann; Heidi Wolters; Katharina Helene Susek; Uwe Haverkamp; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Phase II trial of concomitant neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Joan Manel Gasent Blesa; Javier Garde Noguera; Juan Bautista Laforga Canales; Vicent Giner Bosch; Antonio Alberola; Miguel Soler Tortosa; Miguel Peris Godoy; Jose Luis Sanchez; Mariano Provencio Pulla; Vicente Alberola Candel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Rectal cancer treatment: improving the picture.

Authors:  Juan A Diaz-Gonzalez; Leire Arbea; Javier Aristu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Intensity-modulated extended-field chemoradiation plus simultaneous integrated boost in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a dose-escalation study.

Authors:  Gabriella Macchia; Savino Cilla; Francesco Deodato; Francesco Legge; Aida Di Stefano; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti; Gabriella Ferrandina
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The effect on the small bowel of 5-FU and oxaliplatin in combination with radiation using a microcolony survival assay.

Authors:  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Per Nilsson; Elisabeth Kjellén; Anders Johnsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Factors Associated With Unplanned Hospitalizations Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancers Intended for Treatment in the Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Kristen L Fessele; Matthew J Hayat; Deborah K Mayer; Robert L Atkins
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): dosimetric comparison and clinical implications.

Authors:  Leire Arbea; Luis Isaac Ramos; Rafael Martínez-Monge; Marta Moreno; Javier Aristu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Pelvic Ewing sarcomas. Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  F S Mounessi; P Lehrich; U Haverkamp; N Willich; T Bölling; H T Eich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gastrointestinal tumors.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Meyer; Brian G Czito; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.