| Literature DB >> 26393622 |
Bruno Gügi1, Tinaïg Le Costaouec2, Carole Burel3, Patrice Lerouge4, William Helbert5, Muriel Bardor6,7.
Abstract
Diatoms are marine organisms that represent one of the most important sources of biomass in the ocean, accounting for about 40% of marine primary production, and in the biosphere, contributing up to 20% of global CO₂ fixation. There has been a recent surge in developing the use of diatoms as a source of bioactive compounds in the food and cosmetic industries. In addition, the potential of diatoms such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum as cell factories for the production of biopharmaceuticals is currently under evaluation. These biotechnological applications require a comprehensive understanding of the sugar biosynthesis pathways that operate in diatoms. Here, we review diatom glycan and polysaccharide structures, thus revealing their sugar biosynthesis capabilities.Entities:
Keywords: EPS; diatom; exopolysaccharides; glycan; microalgae; nucleotide sugars; polysaccharide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26393622 PMCID: PMC4584364 DOI: 10.3390/md13095993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Applications of diatom active compounds in human health and food supplements.
Figure 2Ultrastructural organization of a diatom cell: transmission electron micrographs of Phaeodactylum tricornutum oval morphotype. The cells were embedded in LRW resin with 0.5% uranyl acetate in a methanol/Reynold’s lead citrate solution. (A) general overview of a P. tricornutum oval cell. Scale bar = 0.4 µm; (B) zoom of the cell wall. Scale bar = 50 nm. N: nucleus; V: vacuole; C: chloroplast; py: pyrenoid; EPS: exopolysaccharides.
Summary of the monosaccharide composition of diatom extracts: alkali soluble fraction, alkali insoluble fraction, and insoluble organic cell wall residues. Values are expressed in mol% of total monosaccharides detected in extracts. Horizontal sums of values lower than 100% indicate that some monosaccharides were not clearly identified in the corresponding study.
| Monosaccharide | Ara | Fuc | Gal | Glc | Man | Rha | Rib | Xyl | 3-O-MeFuc | 2-MeGal | 3/4-MeGal | GalA | GlcA | 2-MeGlcA | ManA | 2-MeRha | 3-MeRha | 2,3-diMeRha | 3-MeXyl | 4-MeXyl | Unknown | GlcNac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkali soluble fraction | 11 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 52 | — | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
| 32 | 31 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 10 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 7 | 6 | 32 | 25 | 4 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 23 | 6 | — | 22 | 23 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 23 | 11 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 43 | 12 | 4 | 7 | — | 27 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 60 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1.94 | 6.98 | 36 | 19.5 | 17.9 | 4 | 3.91 | 7.31 | |||||||||||||||||
| 0.3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 55.6 | 11.7 | — | 5.4 | nd | tr | — | 1.9 | 6.7 | 12 | nd | nd | — | nd | nd | ||||||
| 7 | 3 | 8 | 18 | 28 | 9 | 1 | 8 | tr | tr | tr | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 11 | 45 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Alkali insoluble fraction | — | 1 | 9 | 7 | 50 | 2 | 2 | 2 | nd | 28 | nd | nd | 2 | nd | — | — | ||||||||
| 1 | 5 | 12 | 72 | 1 | tr | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 66 | 2 | tr | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Insoluble organic cell walls | — | 14 | 14 | tr | 32 | 5 | — | tr | 35 | |||||||||||||||
| — | 64 | 4 | 14 | 11 | tr | — | tr | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| — | tr | 5 | tr | 22 | tr | — | tr | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
| — | tr | 10 | tr | 12 | tr | — | tr | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
| — | 9.2 | 9.9 | 25.9 | 48.5 | 3.8 | — | 3.1 | |||||||||||||||||
| 0.3 | 25.6 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 56.8 | 1.8 | — | 10.9 | |||||||||||||||||
| Insoluble organic cell walls | 0.6 | 0.8 | 5.4 | 46.7 | 6.5 | 1.2 | — | 38.9 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0.6 | 22.4 | 43.3 | 13.6 | 0 | — | 18 | |||||||||||||||||
| — | 12.2 | 12.2 | 13 | 37.2 | 7.4 | — | 17.8 | |||||||||||||||||
| 1.7 | 42.5 | 9.5 | 14.6 | 20.2 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||||
| tr | 1.5 | 7 | 13 | 54 | 9.5 | 11 | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | — | — | ||||||||||
| tr | tr | 2 | 5 | 69 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 12 | — | — | — | 2 | — | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 65 | tr | 5 | — | 10 | — | — | tr | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 64 | 2 | 1 | tr | 15 | — | — | 5 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
| tr | 4.7 | 80.1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | tr | 12.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 6.5 | 45.6 | 40.3 | 1.7 | 4.4 | — | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2.7 | 47.7 | 41.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | tr | 5.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| tr | 6.4 | 67.4 | tr | 6.3 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 12.8 | |||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 3 | 11 | 61 | 12 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | 25 | 47 | 3 | tr | 6 | 2 |
tr, trace (<0.8% mol); —, not detected; nd, not determined. Bright yellow: major compound, green: second-most major compound. a [62]; b [63]; c [66]; d [67]; e [68]; f [69]; g [55]; h [52]; i [53]. Morphotypes of Phaeodactylum tricornutum: F, fusiform; O, oval. Ara, arabinose; Fuc, fucose; Gal, galactose; GalA, galacturonic acid; Glc, glucose; GlcA, glucuronic acid; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; Man, mannose; ManA, mannuronic acid; Me, methyl group; Rha, rhamnose; Rib, ribose; Xyl, xylose.
Figure 3Drawings of hypothetical structures of oligosaccharides found in insoluble cell wall polysaccharides after mild acid hydrolysis of Phaeodactylum tricornutum cell wall extracts. (A) 1,3-linked mannopyranose chains; (B) oligosaccharide fragments. Although hypothetical alpha-linkages are shown here, there is no clear evidence for either alpha- or beta-linkages [65].
Figure 4β-chitin fibers of Thalassiosira sp. (A) Transmission electron micrograph shadowed with tanta-lum/tungsten (Ta/W). (B): N-acetylglucosamine sequence of the chemical structure of chitin. The image was recorded and kindly provided by Dr. H. Chanzy, CERMAV-CNRS, France.
Figure 5Structural analysis of β(1,3) glucan, a food storage polysaccharide. 1H NMR spectra of (A) laminarin from Saccharina latissima and (B) β(1,3) glucan (chrysolaminarin) extracted from Phaeodactylum tricornutum (400 MHz, 353 K). Chrysolaminarin contains fewer β(1,6) branching signals (4.5–4.6 ppm) than laminarin. The slightly higher reducing end signal at 5.26 ppm (α-anomer) in the chrysolaminarin spectrum can be attributed to a lower molecular weight or the absence of a mannitol residue at the reducing end.
Overview of the structural features of diatom chrysolaminarins. For comparison, Laminaria digitata laminarin has a degree of polymerization (DP) of 20–30 residues and a degree of branching (DB) of 0.05, [95]. Yield extraction of chrysolaminarin is expressed in % of diatom dry weight.
| Species | Mw/DP | Branching | Yield% ( | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nd | Some β(1,6) branching | 14% | [ | |
| 6–13 kDa | Some β(1,6) and β(1,2) branching | 32% | [ | |
| 4 kDa, DP ~24 | Some β(1,6) and β(1,2) branching | nd | [ | |
| nd | Small degree of β(1,6) and β(1,2) branching | nd | [ | |
| >10 kDa | Small degree of β(1,6) branching | nd | [ | |
| 3–5 kDa | nd | 0.9% | [ | |
| 40 kDa | β(1,6)/β(1,3) DB 0.053 a | 0.5% | ||
| 2–6 kDa | β(1,6)/β(1,3) DB 0.25 a | 0.4% | ||
| nd | β(1,6)/β(1,3) DB 0.11 a Mannitol detected | 0.6% | ||
| DP 22–24 | β(1,6)/β(1,3) DB 0.006–0.009 | nd | [ | |
| DP 5–13 | No branching | nd | ||
| 4.9 kDa, DP 30 | β(1,6) 37% of total residue | 10% | [ |
nd: not determined; a calculated based on published data.
Structural characteristics of some exopolysaccharides (EPSs) in diatoms: monosaccharide composition, sulfate substitution, linkages. The data are non-exhaustive and only include soluble EPSs recovered from culture media.
| Species | Monosaccharides | Sulfate a (wt%) | Linkages | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GlcA(1.6)/Gal(1.1)/Fuc(1) b | 9.7 | nd c | [ | |
| GlcA(2.8)/Fuc(1)/Gal(0.8) | 18.2 | nd | ||
| UA/Rha/Fuc/Glc/Xyl/Ara d | nd | nd | [ | |
| Fuc(41)/Gal(32)/UA(23)/Man(9)/Rha(8) | 10 | nd | [ | |
| Rha(70)/Man(7)/2 Unk(23) | nd | nd | [ | |
| Fuc(39)/Rha(35)/Gal(26) | 8.7 | t-Fuc f, 2,3-Fuc, 3,4-Fuc, 3-Fuc/2-Rha, t-Rha, 3-Rha, 3,4-Rha/3-Gal, t-Gal, 4-Gal f | [ | |
| Fuc(35)/Gal(10)/Rha(3) | 7 | 2-Fuc f, t-Fuc f, 2,3-Fuc, 3-Fuc, 2,3-Fuc f, 3,4-Fuc, 3,5-Fuc f/3-Gal, 2,3-Gal, t-Gal/2-Rha, t-Rha | [ | |
| Fuc(30)/Gal(29)/Rha(17)/Man(10)/Xyl(9)/Glc(5) | nd | nd | [ | |
| Rha(34)/Fuc(32)/Gal(17)/Man(7)/Xyl(5)/Glc(5) | nd | nd | ||
| Fuc(34)/Man(19)/Glc(16)/Rha(15)/GlcA(9)/Xyl(6) | 16.7 | 3-Fuc/6-Man/3-Glc/2-Rha/t-Xyl with Fuc and Rha branched or sulfated | [ | |
| Xyl(46)/Glc(23)/Rha(15)/Gal(12)/Man(4)/UA(5) | 0 | nd | [ | |
| Gal(38)/Glc(26)/Xyl(13)/Rha(13)/UA(7)/Man(5) | 31 | nd | [ | |
| Rha(33)/Gal(14)/Glc(11)/Man(10)/Rib(8)/Xyl(7)/2 Unk(17)/GlcA(?) | nd | nd | [ | |
| UA/Rha/Fuc/Glc/Xyl/Ara/Gal d | nd | nd | [ | |
| UA/Rha/Fuc/Glc/Ara/Gal/Xyl d | nd | nd | ||
| Rha(33)/Fuc(20)/Man(10)/Xyl(9)/Gal(8)/GlcA(?)/3 Unk(20) | nd | nd | [ | |
| Glc(41)/Xyl(20)/Gal(19)/Man(14)/Rha(5)/UA(21) | 6.3 | nd | [ | |
| Glc(94)/UA(9) | 9.6 | nd | [ | |
| Rha(20)/Gal(17)/Fuc(16)/Ara(8)/Man(7)/Xyl(7)/GlcA(?)/2 Unk(25)/ | nd | nd | [ | |
| Man(34)/Rha(24)/Gal(8)/GlcA(?)/2 Unk(34) | 9 | nd | ||
| Rha(29)/Gal(23.5)/Xyl(17)/Glc(7.5)/Man(6.5)/Fuc(6) | nd | 3-Rha, 3,4-Rha, 2,3-Rha, 2-Rha, t-Rha/ 3-Gal, 3,6-Gal/t-Xyl, 2,4-Xyl, 4-Xyl/4-Glc/4-Man, t-Man/t-Fuc, 2-Fuc | [ | |
| Man(51)/Rha(19)/Fuc(8)/Xyl(6) | nd | t-Man, 4,6-Man, 4-Man/3-Rha, 2-Rha/3-Fuc, t-Fuc/t-Xyl, 2-Xyl | [ | |
| Man(57)/Xyl(19)/GlcA(6)/GalA(5) | nd | 4-Man, t-Man, 2-Man/4-Xyl, t-Xyl/t-GlcA/t-GalA |
a Sulfate percentages represent % weight of isolated polymers; b Only the sugars with contents of >5% are reported. Ara, arabinose; Fuc, fucose; Gal, galactose; Glc, glucose; GlcA, glucuronic acid; Man, mannose; Rha, rhamnose; Rib, ribose; UA, uronic acid; Unk, unknown; Xyl, xylose. Numbers in brackets following abbreviations give relative proportions of monosaccharide residues expressed as mol%, wt%, molar ratio, etc., as reported. The sugars are ordered from high to low percentages for each species; c nd, not determined; d The ratio varies with hydrolysis conditions; e Data also available in the review [48]; f Glycosyl linkages expressed as the position(s) of substitution in addition to C-1 (t-Fuc, terminal fucosyl; 3-Rha, 3-rhamnosyl); Subscript “f” following sugar abbreviation indicates furanose form.
Figure 6Proposed N-glycosylation pathway in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Sequences predicted in the P. tricornutum genome are shown in bold. ALG10 and glucosidase I genes have not been identified so far. The N-glycan structures presented in this figure are as given in Varki et al. [121]. ER: endoplasmic reticulum; DPM1: dolichol-phosphate mannosyl transferase; ALG: asparagine-linked glycosylation; PP-Dol: pyrophosphate dolichol; P-Dol: dolichol phosphate; OST: oligosaccharyl transferase; Asn: asparagine; UGGT: UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyl transferase; GnT: N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase; α-Man: α-Mannosidase; FuT: fucosyl transferase; Man-5 to Man-9: oligomannoside bearing 5 to 9 mannose residues.
Figure 7Predicted nucleotide sugar metabolism in diatoms based on bioinformatics analyses of the genomes from Phaeodactylum tricornutum [129], Thalassiosira pseudonana [130], Fragilariopsis cylindrus [131] and Aureococcus anophagefferens [132].