| Literature DB >> 26391173 |
A E Bankole1, A A Adekunle2, A A Sowemimo3, C E Umebese2, O Abiodun4, G O Gbotosho4.
Abstract
The use of plant to meet health-care needs has greatly increased worldwide in the recent times. The search for new plant-derived bioactive agents that can be explored for the treatment of drug-resistant malaria infection is urgently needed. Thus, we evaluated the antimalarial activity of three medicinal plants used in Nigerian folklore for the treatment of malaria infection. A modified Peter's 4-day suppressive test was used to evaluate the antimalarial activity of the plant extracts in a mouse model of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium berghei ANKA strain. Animals were treated with 250, 500, or 800 mg/kg of aqueous extract. It was observed that of all the three plants studied, Markhamia tomentosa showed the highest chemosuppression of parasites of 73 % followed by Polyalthia longifolia (53 %) at day 4. All the doses tested were well tolerated. Percentage suppression of parasite growth on day 4 post-infection ranged from 1 to 73 % in mice infected with P. berghei and treated with extracts when compared with chloroquine diphosphate, the standard reference drug which had a chemosuppression of 90 %. The percentage survival of mice that received extract ranged from 0 to 60 % (increased as the dose increases to 800 mg/kg). Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of tannins, saponins, and phenolic compounds in all the three plants tested.Entities:
Keywords: Markhamia tomentosa; Plasmodium berghei; Polyalthia longifolia; Trichilia heudelotii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26391173 PMCID: PMC4700078 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4747-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Fig. 1a Markhamia tomentosa plant. b Polyalthia longifolia plant. c Trichilia heudelotii plant
Response to treatment in Swiss albino mice infected with CQR P. berghei to aqueous extract of three medicinal plants at day 4
| Dose of plant extracts (mg/kg) | Parasitemia ± SEM (%) | Parasite suppression ± SEM (%) | % survival till day 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 250 | 6.85 ± 0.65 | 46 | 20 |
| 500 | 7.15 ± 0.36 | 43 | 40 |
| 800 | 4.96 ± 0.73 | 73 | 60 |
|
| |||
| 250 | 12.56 ± 1.80 | 1 | 0 |
| 500 | 9.95 ± 0.95 | 21 | 40 |
| 800 | 5.94 ± 1.29 | 53 | 40 |
|
| |||
| 250 | 19.05 ± 4.29 | 0 | 0 |
| 500 | 9.95 ± 1.67 | 21 | 40 |
| 800 | 7.63 ± 0.47 | 40 | 40 |
| Chloroquine (CQ) | |||
| 10 | 1.33 ± 0.56 | 90 | 60 |
| Untreated control (NT) | 12.66 ± 1.07 | 0 | |
Values are parasite density ± standard deviation (PD ± SEM)
CQ Chloroquine diphosphate (10 mg/kg/day), NT untreated control, l leaf, sb stem bark
Qualitative phytochemical screening of the medicinal plants studied
| Secondary metabolites |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + | + | − |
| Tannins | + | + | + |
| Saponins | + | + | + |
| Flavonoids | + | + | − |
| Cardiac glycosides | − | − | + |
| Anthraquinones | − | − | + |
| Phlobatannins | − | − | + |
| Phenolic compounds | + | + | + |
| Proteins | + | + | + |
| Terpenes | + | − | + |
| Steroids | − | − | − |
Quantitative phytochemical screening of the medicinal plants studied
| Extract | Tannins mg/100 g | Alkaloids mg/100 g | Phenols mg/100 g | Flavonoids mg/100 g | C. glycosides mg/100 g | Saponin mg/100 g | Anthraquinones mg/100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 29.24 ± 0.08 | 6.48 ± 0.18 | 22.73 ± 0.16 | 4.41 ± 0.06 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 8.99 ± 0.23 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
|
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | 5.52 ± 0.18 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 5.22 ± 0.19 | 2.65 ± 0.13 | 10.64 ± 0.15 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
|
| 46.93 ± 1.16 | 1.43 ± 0.18 | 41.41 ± 0.22 | 13.08 ± 0.26 | 3.05 ± 0.19 | 8.46 ± 0.23 | 9.57 ± 0.19 |