| Literature DB >> 26389008 |
Anderson Chun On Tsang1, Arthur Man Yuen Fung1, Frederick Chun Pong Tsang1, Gilberto Ka Kit Leung1, Raymand Lee2, Wai Man Lui1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The pipeline embolization device (PED) is a flow diverter that has shown promise in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Close to one-fifth of aneurysms, however, fail to occlude after PED placement. This study aims to identify anatomical features and clinicopathologic factors that may predispose failed aneurysm occlusion with the PED.Entities:
Keywords: Fetal circulation; Flow diverters; Intracranial aneurysm; Outcome; Pipeline embolization device
Year: 2015 PMID: 26389008 PMCID: PMC4571555 DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2015.10.2.60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurointervention ISSN: 2093-9043
Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of the 29 Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device
| Size (mm) | Mean: 6.99 Range: 2.1 - 22 |
|---|---|
| Size by group | |
| Small (< 10 mm) | 23 |
| Large (10-25 mm) | 6 |
| Neck width | |
| < 4 mm | 16 |
| > 4 mm | 13 |
| Aspect ratio | |
| < 1.5 | 16 |
| > 1.5 | 13 |
| Prior treatment | |
| None | 25 |
| Stenting + coiling | 1 |
| Coiling | 3 |
| Number of PED used | |
| One | 19 |
| Two | 10 |
| Use of adjuvant coiling | 2 |
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Potential Predictors for Failed Aneurysm Occlusion
| Factors | Subgroups | Occluded / Total no. IA | Occlusion rate | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Men | 2/5 | 40% | 0.033 |
| Women | 21/24 | 87.5% | ||
| IA location | PComA | 0/4 | 0% | 0.999 |
| Cavernous ICA | 4/5 | 80% | ||
| Paraclinoid ICA | 17/17 | 100% | ||
| Supraclinoid ICA+ | 2/3 | 66.7% | ||
| Size* | Small | 19/23 | 82.6% | 0.145 |
| Large | 4/6 | 66.7% | ||
| Aspect ratio | < 1.5 | 12/16 | 75.0% | 0.528 |
| > 1.5 | 11/13 | 84.6% | ||
| Neck width | < 4 mm | 14/15 | 93.3% | 0.081 |
| > 4 mm | 9/14 | 64.2% | ||
| Prior treatment | None | 21/25 | 84% | 0.145 |
| Prior treatment | 2/4 | 50% | ||
| No. of PED used | One | 17/19 | 89.5% | 0.079 |
| Two | 6/10 | 60% |
*Size: small (<10 mm), large (10-25 mm).
+ Other than PComA lesions.
IA, Intracranial aneurysm; PComA, posterior communicating artery; ICA, internal carotid artery
Fig. 1Patient 1. (A) Pre-treatment digital subtraction angiography showing the fetal-type posterior communicating artery circulation (long arrow) and aneurysm (arrow); (B) curve reformation of the post-treatment CTA showed that the right PComA IA was receiving persistent supply from the fetal PComA (arrow).
Fig. 2Patient 2.(A) Pre-treatment computer tomography angiography showing the right posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysm remnant (long arrow), which was previously treated with four GDC coils, and the atrophic right P1 segment (arrowhead) associated with fetal-type; (B) control DSA showing persistent supply to the aneurysm despite coverage with PED (black arrow).
Fig. 3Patient 3. (A) Pre-treatment magnetic resonance angiography showing the left-sided aneurysm (long arrow), and the atrophic right P1 segment (arrow head) associated with fetal-type circulation; (B) pre-treatment digital subtraction angiography showing that the aneurysm received supply from both the internal carotid artery and the fetal posterior communicating artery; (C) digital subtraction angiography performed six months after the placement of one pipeline device showing persistent contrast filling of the slightly enlarged aneurysm with evidence of coil compaction.