| Literature DB >> 26388664 |
Youngbin Kwak1, John W Payne2, Andrew L Cohen1, Scott A Huettel3.
Abstract
Adolescence is often viewed as a time of irrational, risky decision-making - despite adolescents' competence in other cognitive domains. In this study, we examined the strategies used by adolescents (N=30) and young adults (N=47) to resolve complex, multi-outcome economic gambles. Compared to adults, adolescents were more likely to make conservative, loss-minimizing choices consistent with economic models. Eye-tracking data showed that prior to decisions, adolescents acquired more information in a more thorough manner; that is, they engaged in a more analytic processing strategy indicative of trade-offs between decision variables. In contrast, young adults' decisions were more consistent with heuristics that simplified the decision problem, at the expense of analytic precision. Collectively, these results demonstrate a counter-intuitive developmental transition in economic decision making: adolescents' decisions are more consistent with rational-choice models, while young adults more readily engage task-appropriate heuristics.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent; decision strategy; eye tracking; heuristics
Year: 2015 PMID: 26388664 PMCID: PMC4571495 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Dev ISSN: 0885-2014