BACKGROUND: Reducing the fraction of transmissions during recent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is essential for the population-level success of "treatment as prevention". METHODS: A phylogenetic tree was constructed with 19 604 Swiss sequences and 90 994 non-Swiss background sequences. Swiss transmission pairs were identified using 104 combinations of genetic distance (1%-2.5%) and bootstrap (50%-100%) thresholds, to examine the effect of those criteria. Monophyletic pairs were classified as recent or chronic transmission based on the time interval between estimated seroconversion dates. Logistic regression with adjustment for clinical and demographic characteristics was used to identify risk factors associated with transmission during recent or chronic infection. FINDINGS: Seroconversion dates were estimated for 4079 patients on the phylogeny, and comprised between 71 (distance, 1%; bootstrap, 100%) to 378 transmission pairs (distance, 2.5%; bootstrap, 50%). We found that 43.7% (range, 41%-56%) of the transmissions occurred during the first year of infection. Stricter phylogenetic definition of transmission pairs was associated with higher recent-phase transmission fraction. Chronic-phase viral load area under the curve (adjusted odds ratio, 3; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-5.48) and time to antiretroviral therapy (ART) start (adjusted odds ratio 1.4/y; 1.11-1.77) were associated with chronic-phase transmission as opposed to recent transmission. Importantly, at least 14% of the chronic-phase transmission events occurred after the transmitter had interrupted ART. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a high fraction of transmission during recent HIV infection but also chronic transmissions after interruption of ART in Switzerland. Both represent key issues for treatment as prevention and underline the importance of early diagnosis and of early and continuous treatment.
BACKGROUND: Reducing the fraction of transmissions during recent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is essential for the population-level success of "treatment as prevention". METHODS: A phylogenetic tree was constructed with 19 604 Swiss sequences and 90 994 non-Swiss background sequences. Swiss transmission pairs were identified using 104 combinations of genetic distance (1%-2.5%) and bootstrap (50%-100%) thresholds, to examine the effect of those criteria. Monophyletic pairs were classified as recent or chronic transmission based on the time interval between estimated seroconversion dates. Logistic regression with adjustment for clinical and demographic characteristics was used to identify risk factors associated with transmission during recent or chronic infection. FINDINGS: Seroconversion dates were estimated for 4079 patients on the phylogeny, and comprised between 71 (distance, 1%; bootstrap, 100%) to 378 transmission pairs (distance, 2.5%; bootstrap, 50%). We found that 43.7% (range, 41%-56%) of the transmissions occurred during the first year of infection. Stricter phylogenetic definition of transmission pairs was associated with higher recent-phase transmission fraction. Chronic-phase viral load area under the curve (adjusted odds ratio, 3; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-5.48) and time to antiretroviral therapy (ART) start (adjusted odds ratio 1.4/y; 1.11-1.77) were associated with chronic-phase transmission as opposed to recent transmission. Importantly, at least 14% of the chronic-phase transmission events occurred after the transmitter had interrupted ART. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a high fraction of transmission during recent HIV infection but also chronic transmissions after interruption of ART in Switzerland. Both represent key issues for treatment as prevention and underline the importance of early diagnosis and of early and continuous treatment.
Authors: Mina Psichogiou; George Giallouros; Katerina Pantavou; Eirini Pavlitina; Martha Papadopoulou; Leslie D Williams; Andria Hadjikou; Eleni Kakalou; Athanasios Skoutelis; Konstantinos Protopapas; Anastasia Antoniadou; George Boulmetis; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Angelos Hatzakis; Samuel R Friedman; Georgios K Nikolopoulos Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2019-04-02
Authors: Huldrych F Günthard; Michael S Saag; Constance A Benson; Carlos del Rio; Joseph J Eron; Joel E Gallant; Jennifer F Hoy; Michael J Mugavero; Paul E Sax; Melanie A Thompson; Rajesh T Gandhi; Raphael J Landovitz; Davey M Smith; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Foteini Giannou; Georgios K Nikolopoulos; Katerina Pantavou; Vassiliki Benetou; Maria Kantzanou; Vana Sypsa; Leslie D Williams; Samuel R Friedman; Angelos Hatzakis Journal: Curr HIV Res Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.581
Authors: Seble G Kassaye; Zehava Grossman; Maya Balamane; Betsy Johnston-White; Chenglong Liu; Princy Kumar; Mary Young; Michael C Sneller; Irini Sereti; Robin Dewar; Catherine Rehm; William Meyer; Robert Shafer; David Katzenstein; Frank Maldarelli Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Leslie D Williams; A Korobchuk; E Pavlitina; G K Nikolopoulos; B Skaathun; J Schneider; E-G Kostaki; P Smyrnov; T I Vasylyeva; M Psichogiou; D Paraskevis; E Morgan; A Hadjikou; M J Downing; A Hatzakis; S R Friedman Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-05
Authors: Mohaned Shilaih; Alex Marzel; Wan Lin Yang; Alexandra U Scherrer; Jörg Schüpbach; Jürg Böni; Sabine Yerly; Hans H Hirsch; Vincent Aubert; Matthias Cavassini; Thomas Klimkait; Pietro L Vernazza; Enos Bernasconi; Hansjakob Furrer; Huldrych F Günthard; Roger Kouyos Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 4.379