Literature DB >> 26386830

Anti-Neospora caninum and anti-Sarcocystis spp. specific antibodies cross-react with Besnoitia besnoiti and influence the serological diagnosis of bovine besnoitiosis.

P García-Lunar1, G Moré2, L Campero2, L M Ortega-Mora1, G Álvarez-García3.   

Abstract

Bovine besnoitiosis control remains a challenge because the disease continues to spread and control relies solely on accurate diagnosis coupled to management measures. However, recent studies have reported that routinely used ELISAs may raise a high number of false-positive results. Herein, cross-reactions between Besnoitia besnoiti antigens and anti-Neospora caninum and/or anti-Sarcocystis spp.-specific antibodies were studied in an in house ELISA since N. caninum and Sarcocystis spp. are closely related parasites, and both infections are highly prevalent in cattle worldwide. The serum panel was composed of the following categories: sera from B. besnoiti-seronegative (n=75) and -seropositive cattle (n=66), B. besnoiti-based-ELISA false-positive reactors (n=96) together with N. caninum (n=36) and Sarcocystis spp. (n=42) -seropositive reference cattle sera. B. besnoiti tachyzoite based western blot (WB) results classified animals as seropositive or seronegative. Sera were analyzed for the detection of anti-N. caninum by WB and ELISA and anti-Sarcocystis spp.-specific antibodies by WB and IFAT. Those samples recognizing a Sarcocystis spp. 18-20 kDa antigenic region and N. caninum 17-18 kDa immunodominant antigen were considered to be Sarcocystis spp. and N. caninum seropositive, respectively. The category of B. besnoiti based-ELISA false-positive reactors showed the highest number of sera with specific anti-Sarcocystis spp. and anti-N. caninum antibodies (74%; 71/96), followed by the N. caninum-seropositive cattle category (52.8%; 19/36). In contrast, few B. besnoiti-seronegative and -seropositive cattle showed antibodies against Sarcocystis spp. and N. caninum (10.7%; 8/75 and 1.5%; 1/66), respectively). This study revealed that B. besnoiti false-positive ELISA results were associated not only with the presence of anti-N. caninum and anti-Sarcocystis spp. antibodies (χ(2): 78.36; p<0.0001; OR: 34.6; CI: 14-88) but also with high antibody levels against them using ELISA and IFAT tests, respectively (p<0.05; t-test). These results may explain why only some animals seropositive to Sarcocystis spp. and/or N. caninum are Besnoitia false-positive reactors. Therefore, sera meeting these requirements should be included in future validations of serological tests for bovine besnoitiosis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Besnoitia besnoiti; Cattle; Cross-reactions; Neospora caninum; Sarcocystis spp; Serological diagnosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386830     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  7 in total

1.  An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle.

Authors:  Lucía M Campero; Javier Moreno-Gonzalo; María C Venturini; Gastón Moré; Andrea Dellarupe; Magdalena Rambeaud; Ignacio E Echaide; Beatriz Valentini; Carlos M Campero; Dadín P Moore; Dora B Cano; Marcelo Fort; Rinaldo A Mota; Marcos E Serrano-Martínez; Carlos Cruz-Vázquez; Luis M Ortega-Mora; Gema Álvarez-García
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Serological dynamics and risk factors of Besnoitia besnoiti infection in breeding bulls from an endemically infected purebred beef herd.

Authors:  Alessia Libera Gazzonis; Gema Alvarez Garcia; Andrea Maggioni; Sergio Aurelio Zanzani; Emanuela Olivieri; Riccardo Compiani; Giuseppe Sironi; Luis Miguel Ortega Mora; Maria Teresa Manfredi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Chimeric Protein Designed by Genome-Scale Immunoinformatics Enhances Serodiagnosis of Bovine Neosporosis.

Authors:  Higor Sette Pereira; Ludmila Tavares E Almeida; Vitória Fernandes; Renato Lima Senra; Patrícia Pereira Fontes; Eustáquio Resende Bittar; Andréa de Oliveira Barros Ribon; Polyana Pizzi Rotta; Daniel Menezes-Souza; Joely Ferreira Figueiredo Bittar; Tiago Antônio de Oliveira Mendes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Selected metabolic biochemical and enzyme activities associated with Besnoitia besnoiti infection in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Musa Alshehabat; Myassar Alekish; Abdelsalam Talafha
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Absence of antibodies specific to Besnoitia spp. in European sheep and goats from areas in Spain where bovine besnoitiosis is endemic.

Authors:  Daniel Gutiérrez-Expósito; Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora; Victor Ara; Ignasi Marco; Santiago Lavín; Javier Carvajal-Valilla; Angel Morales; Gema Álvarez-García
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Bovine besnoitiosis in an endemically infected dairy cattle herd in Italy: serological and clinical observations, risk factors, and effects on reproductive and productive performances.

Authors:  Luca Villa; Alessia Libera Gazzonis; Sergio Aurelio Zanzani; Chiara Perlotti; Giuseppe Sironi; Maria Teresa Manfredi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 7.  Importance of serological cross-reactivity among Toxoplasma gondii, Hammondia spp., Neospora spp., Sarcocystis spp. and Besnoitia besnoiti.

Authors:  Luís F P Gondim; José R Mineo; Gereon Schares
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.234

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.