Literature DB >> 26386463

Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico.

M A Colchero1, J C Salgado2, M Unar-Munguía2, M Hernández-Ávila2, J A Rivera-Dommarco2.   

Abstract

A large and growing body of scientific evidence demonstrates that sugar drinks are harmful to health. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is a risk factor for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Mexico has one of the largest per capita consumption of soft drinks worldwide and high rates of obesity and diabetes. Fiscal approaches such as taxation have been recommended as a public health policy to reduce SSB consumption. We estimated an almost ideal demand system with linear approximation for beverages and high-energy food by simultaneous equations and derived the own and cross price elasticities for soft drinks and for all SSB (soft drinks, fruit juices, fruit drinks, flavored water and energy drinks). Models were stratified by income quintile and marginality index at the municipality level. Price elasticity for soft drinks was -1.06 and -1.16 for SSB, i.e., a 10% price increase was associated with a decrease in quantity consumed of soft drinks by 10.6% and 11.6% for SSB. A price increase in soft drinks is associated with larger quantity consumed of water, milk, snacks and sugar and a decrease in the consumption of other SSB, candies and traditional snacks. The same was found for SSB except that an increase in price of SSB was associated with a decrease in snacks. Higher elasticities were found among households living in rural areas (for soft drinks), in more marginalized areas and with lower income. Implementation of a tax to soft drinks or to SSB could decrease consumption particularly among the poor. Substitutions and complementarities with other food and beverages should be evaluated to assess the potential impact on total calories consumed.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mexico; Obesity; Price elasticity; Soft drinks; Sugar sweetened beverages

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386463     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  46 in total

1.  After Mexico Implemented a Tax, Purchases of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Decreased and Water Increased: Difference by Place of Residence, Household Composition, and Income Level.

Authors:  M Arantxa Colchero; Mariana Molina; Carlos M Guerrero-López
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico?

Authors:  Shu Wen Ng; Juan A Rivera; Barry M Popkin; M Arantxa Colchero
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  The price of ultra-processed foods and beverages and adult body weight: Evidence from U.S. veterans.

Authors:  Lisa M Powell; Kelly Jones; Ana Clara Duran; Elizabeth Tarlov; Shannon N Zenk
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.184

Review 4.  Obesity Prevention: Strategies and Challenges in Latin America.

Authors:  Louise Cominato; Georgia Finardi Di Biagio; Denise Lellis; Ruth Rocha Franco; Marcio Correa Mancini; Maria Edna de Melo
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2018-06

5.  In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.

Authors:  M Arantxa Colchero; Juan Rivera-Dommarco; Barry M Popkin; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The Effect of Price Changes and Teaspoon Labelling on Intention to Purchase Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Vinh Vo; K-H Nguyen; J A Whitty; Tracy A Comans
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico's 8% nonessential food tax.

Authors:  Lindsey Smith Taillie; Juan A Rivera; Barry M Popkin; Carolina Batis
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Designing a food tax to impact food-related non-communicable diseases: the case of Chile.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Caro; Lindsey Smith-Taillie; Shu Wen Ng; Barry Popkin
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Carbonating the household diet: a Pakistani tale.

Authors:  Biplab K Datta; Muhammad Jami Husain
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Study protocol: combining experimental methods, econometrics and simulation modelling to determine price elasticities for studying food taxes and subsidies (The Price ExaM Study).

Authors:  Wilma E Waterlander; Tony Blakely; Nhung Nghiem; Christine L Cleghorn; Helen Eyles; Murat Genc; Nick Wilson; Yannan Jiang; Boyd Swinburn; Liana Jacobi; Jo Michie; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.