Literature DB >> 26384702

Combination therapy of stem cell derived neural progenitors and drug delivery of anti-inhibitory molecules for spinal cord injury.

Thomas S Wilems1, Jennifer Pardieck1, Nisha Iyer1, Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert2.   

Abstract

Regeneration of lost synaptic connections following spinal cord injury (SCI) is limited by local ischemia, cell death, and an excitotoxic environment, which leads to the development of an inhibitory glial scar surrounding a cystic cavity. While a variety of single therapy interventions provide incremental improvements to functional recovery after SCI, they are limited; a multifactorial approach that combines several single therapies may provide a better chance of overcoming the multitude of obstacles to recovery. To this end, fibrin scaffolds were modified to provide sustained delivery of neurotrophic factors and anti-inhibitory molecules, as well as encapsulation of embryonic stem cell-derived progenitor motor neurons (pMNs). In vitro characterization of this combination scaffold confirmed that pMN viability was unaffected by culture alongside sustained delivery systems. When transplanted into a rat sub-acute SCI model, fibrin scaffolds containing growth factors (GFs), anti-inhibitory molecules without pMNs, or pMNs with GFs had lower chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan levels compared to scaffolds containing anti-inhibitory molecules with pMNs. Scaffolds containing pMNs, but not anti-inhibitory molecules, showed survival, differentiation into neuronal cell types, axonal extension in the transplant area, and the ability to integrate into host tissue. However, the combination of pMNs with sustained-delivery of anti-inhibitory molecules led to reduced cell survival and increased macrophage infiltration. While combination therapies retain potential for effective treatment of SCI, further work is needed to improve cell survival and to limit inflammation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Spinal cord injury (SCI) creates a highly complex inhibitory environment with a multitude of obstacles that limit recovery. Many therapeutic options have been developed to overcome single obstacles, but single therapies typically only lead to limited functional improvement. Therefore combination therapies may improve recovery by targeting several inhibitory obstacles simultaneously. The present study used biomaterial scaffolds to combine the sustained release of anti-inhibitory molecules and growth factors with cell transplantation of highly purified progenitor motor neurons. This expands upon previously established biomaterial scaffolds by supporting surviving cells, limiting inhibition from the extracellular environment, and replenishing lost cell populations. We show that while promising, certain combinations may exacerbate negative side-effects instead of augmenting positive features.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chondroitinase ABC; Controlled release; Lipid microtubes; NEP1-40; PLGA microspheres; Progenitor motor neurons

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384702      PMCID: PMC4648646          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  66 in total

1.  Transplantation of neuronal and glial restricted precursors into contused spinal cord improves bladder and motor functions, decreases thermal hypersensitivity, and modifies intraspinal circuitry.

Authors:  Takahiko Mitsui; Jed S Shumsky; Angelo C Lepore; Marion Murray; Itzhak Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The Nogo-66 receptor: focusing myelin inhibition of axon regeneration.

Authors:  Aaron W McGee; Stephen M Strittmatter
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 3.  A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wolfram Tetzlaff; Elena B Okon; Soheila Karimi-Abdolrezaee; Caitlin E Hill; Joseph S Sparling; Jason R Plemel; Ward T Plunet; Eve C Tsai; Darryl Baptiste; Laura J Smithson; Michael D Kawaja; Michael G Fehlings; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Transplants of fibroblasts genetically modified to express BDNF promote regeneration of adult rat rubrospinal axons and recovery of forelimb function.

Authors:  Y Liu; D Kim; B T Himes; S Y Chow; T Schallert; M Murray; A Tessler; I Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Leukocyte common antigen-related phosphatase is a functional receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan axon growth inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniel Fisher; Bin Xing; John Dill; Hui Li; Hai Hiep Hoang; Zhenze Zhao; Xiao-Li Yang; Robert Bachoo; Stephen Cannon; Frank M Longo; Morgan Sheng; Jerry Silver; Shuxin Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Myelin-associated glycoprotein interacts with the Nogo66 receptor to inhibit neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  Marco Domeniconi; Zixuan Cao; Timothy Spencer; Rajeev Sivasankaran; Kevin Wang; Elena Nikulina; Noriko Kimura; Hong Cai; Kangwen Deng; Ying Gao; Zhigang He; Marie Filbin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  PTPsigma is a receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, an inhibitor of neural regeneration.

Authors:  Yingjie Shen; Alan P Tenney; Sarah A Busch; Kevin P Horn; Fernando X Cuascut; Kai Liu; Zhigang He; Jerry Silver; John G Flanagan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Localization of Nogo-A and Nogo-66 receptor proteins at sites of axon-myelin and synaptic contact.

Authors:  Xingxing Wang; Soo-Jin Chun; Helen Treloar; Timothy Vartanian; Charles A Greer; Stephen M Strittmatter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  NgR1 and NgR3 are receptors for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans.

Authors:  Travis L Dickendesher; Katherine T Baldwin; Yevgeniya A Mironova; Yoshiki Koriyama; Stephen J Raiker; Kim L Askew; Andrew Wood; Cédric G Geoffroy; Binhai Zheng; Claire D Liepmann; Yasuhiro Katagiri; Larry I Benowitz; Herbert M Geller; Roman J Giger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  PDGF and intracellular signaling in the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation.

Authors:  I K Hart; W D Richardson; S R Bolsover; M C Raff
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  21 in total

1.  Trehalose attenuates spinal cord injury through the regulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and GFAP expression in rats.

Authors:  Mahdieh Nazari-Robati; Mahboobe Akbari; Mohammad Khaksari; Moghaddameh Mirzaee
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  Combination therapies for neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury: Is more better?

Authors:  Anthony E Kline; Jacob B Leary; Hannah L Radabaugh; Jeffrey P Cheng; Corina O Bondi
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 3.  In vitro selection technologies to enhance biomaterial functionality.

Authors:  Jonah C Rosch; Emma K Hollmann; Ethan S Lippmann
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05-02

Review 4.  Recent advances in nanotherapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury repair.

Authors:  Young Hye Song; Nikunj K Agrawal; Jonathan M Griffin; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 5.  CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering: Treating inherited retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Erin R Burnight; Joseph C Giacalone; Jessica A Cooke; Jessica R Thompson; Laura R Bohrer; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; John H Fingert; Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 6.  Regenerative Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Nureddin Ashammakhi; Han-Jun Kim; Arshia Ehsanipour; Rebecca D Bierman; Outi Kaarela; Chengbin Xue; Ali Khademhosseini; Stephanie K Seidlits
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  Stem cells for spinal cord injury: Strategies to inform differentiation and transplantation.

Authors:  Nisha R Iyer; Thomas S Wilems; Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Valproic acid preserves motoneurons following contusion in organotypic spinal cord slice culture.

Authors:  Sareh Pandamooz; Mohammad Saied Salehi; Mohammad Nabiuni; Leila Dargahi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Biomaterial strategies for limiting the impact of secondary events following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Trevor R Ham; Nic D Leipzig
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.715

10.  Formulation of thrombin-inhibiting hydrogels via self-assembly of ionic peptides with peptide-modified polymers.

Authors:  Jason Lee; Tianyu Zhao; David J Peeler; Daniel C Lee; Trey J Pichon; David Li; Kathleen M Weigandt; Philip J Horner; Lilo D Pozzo; Drew L Sellers; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.