Literature DB >> 26383668

Genome Sequence of Rough and Smooth Variants of Pleomorphic Strain Lactobacillus farciminis CNCM-I-3699.

R Tareb1, M Bernardeau1, J P Vernoux2.   

Abstract

The probiotic Lactobacillus farciminis CNCM-I-3699 is a pleomorphic strain exhibiting smooth and rough variants. We report their complete genomes consisting of a chromosome of 2, 4 Mb and a plasmid of 6,417 bp. The smooth variant differs by the presence of an additional plasmid of 35,418 bp.
Copyright © 2015 Tareb et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26383668      PMCID: PMC4574373          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01059-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacillus farciminis CNCM-I-3699 is a probiotic strain isolated from goat rumen and used now as a probiotic additive in feed (1, 2). The probiotic properties of this strain were demonstrated in vitro (3, 4) and in vivo (2). Interestingly, L. farciminis CNCM-I-3699 is a pleomorphic strain reproducibly giving rise to two phenotypically distinct morphotypes R for rough (L. farciminis CNCM-I-3699-R) and S for smooth (L. farciminis CNCM-I-3699-S) (5). Significant differences in capsular polysaccharide production were observed: the smooth phenotype corresponds to circular colony with slimy filamentous aspect “ropy”; while the rough morphotype gives irregular, flat, and nonropy colonies. Here we present the complete genome sequence of R and S variants. The only other L. farciminis genome available to date is the draft genome of strain KTCC 3126 (6). Genomic DNA from both variants was first sequenced using the Illumina GAIIx platform (Baseclear, Netherlands) with a 100 bp paired-end library and a total coverage rate that exceeds 100-fold. Assembly of Hiseq reads was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.0 (Genostar, Montbonnot, France). To complement both draft genomes, a 454 pyrosequencing run was performed, targeting 8× coverage, using a GS-FLX sequencer (Genoscreen, Lille, France) and GS-FLX read assembly was done using 454 Newbler version 2.6. Furthermore, an optical map was generated for the smooth variant (Genoscreen, France) using a NcoI enzyme. To generate an orderly genome for both variants, assembled GS-FLX and Hiseq contigs were aligned with the optical map generated from CNCM-I-3699-S. Both smooth and rough variants exhibit an identical genome, which contains a circular chromosome of 2, 4 Mb (2,423,489 bp and 2,423,335 bp, respectively; G+C 35.7%) and one plasmid of 6,417 bp. The smooth variant differs by the presence of an additional plasmid of 35,418 bp. Automatic annotation was performed by the RAST annotation server to predict coding DNA sequences (CDS) and their putative functions (7). Gene ontology and Pfm were assigned by searching all predicted proteins against the UFO web server (http://ufo.gobics.de) (8). The predicted proteins were searched against the KEGG database using KAAS (KEGG Automatic Annotation Server http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/) (9). The Prophinder (http://aclame.ulb.ac.be/Tools/Prophinder/) (10) and IS finder (http://www-is.biotoul.fr) (11) were used to detect atypical genome regions corresponding to a prophage, putative horizontal gene transfer, insertion sequence (IS). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) elements already reported (5) were confirmed by the CRISPR Finder web software (12). The specific plasmid of the smooth variant comprises a capsular polysaccharide locus that was flanked by phage sequences. In addition, it includes a sugar transporter and genes related to growth in anaerobic conditions, potentially explaining the predominance of the S variant in anaerobic conditions (5). A more comprehensive report, comparing the complete genomes of the two variants in relation to probiotic properties, genome plasticity, and probiotic lifestyle, will be the subject of a future publication.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The complete genome sequences of the chromosomes and plasmids of S and R variants have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers CP011952, CP011953, CP011954, CP012177, and CP012178.
  10 in total

1.  Prophinder: a computational tool for prophage prediction in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Gipsi Lima-Mendez; Jacques Van Helden; Ariane Toussaint; Raphaël Leplae
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genome sequence of Lactobacillus farciminis KCTC 3681.

Authors:  Seong-Hyeuk Nam; Sang-Haeng Choi; Aram Kang; Dong-Wook Kim; Ryong Nam Kim; Aeri Kim; Dae-Soo Kim; Hong-Seog Park
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Rough and smooth morphotypes isolated from Lactobacillus farciminis CNCM I-3699 are two closely-related variants.

Authors:  Raouf Tareb; Marion Bernardeau; Philippe Horvath; Jean-Paul Vernoux
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria, especially Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Raouf Tareb; Marion Bernardeau; Marielle Gueguen; Jean-Paul Vernoux
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  In vitro antagonistic activities of Lactobacillus spp. against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira pilosicoli.

Authors:  Marion Bernardeau; Micheline Gueguen; David G E Smith; Enrique Corona-Barrera; Jean Paul Vernoux
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  UFO: a web server for ultra-fast functional profiling of whole genome protein sequences.

Authors:  Peter Meinicke
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences.

Authors:  P Siguier; J Perochon; L Lestrade; J Mahillon; M Chandler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server.

Authors:  Yuki Moriya; Masumi Itoh; Shujiro Okuda; Akiyasu C Yoshizawa; Minoru Kanehisa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.

Authors:  Ibtissem Grissa; Gilles Vergnaud; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.