Literature DB >> 26383182

The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review.

Birger Kollmeier1,2,3,4, Anna Warzybok1,2, Sabine Hochmuth1,2, Melanie A Zokoll1,2, Verena Uslar1,2,3, Thomas Brand1,2, Kirsten C Wagener1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A review of the development, evaluation, and application of the so-called 'matrix sentence test' for speech intelligibility testing in a multilingual society is provided. The format allows for repeated use with the same patient in her or his native language even if the experimenter does not understand the language.
DESIGN: Using a closed-set format, the syntactically fixed, semantically unpredictable sentences (e.g. 'Peter bought eight white ships') provide a vocabulary of 50 words (10 alternatives for each position in the sentence). The principles (i.e. construction, optimization, evaluation, and validation) for 14 different languages are reviewed. Studies of the influence of talker, language, noise, the training effect, open vs. closed conduct of the test, and the subjects' language proficiency are reported and application examples are discussed.
RESULTS: The optimization principles result in a steep intelligibility function and a high homogeneity of the speech materials presented and test lists employed, yielding a high efficiency and excellent comparability across languages. The characteristics of speakers generally dominate the differences across languages.
CONCLUSION: The matrix test format with the principles outlined here is recommended for producing efficient, reliable, and comparable speech reception thresholds across different languages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Speech intelligibility in noise; effect of language; speech reception threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26383182     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  51 in total

1.  Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test.

Authors:  Zahra Polat; Erdoğan Bulut; Ahmet Ataş
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  Benefit of binaural listening as revealed by speech intelligibility and listening effort.

Authors:  Jan Rennies; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation.

Authors:  Nina Wardenga; Ad F M Snik; Eugen Kludt; Bernd Waldmann; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  The development and validation of the Closed-set Mandarin Sentence (CMS) test.

Authors:  Duo-Duo Tao; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Ya-Feng Yu
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 5.  [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].

Authors:  T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Matthew J Goupell; Nathaniel J Spencer; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  [Speech audiometry in expert assessment of hearing impairment].

Authors:  C Batsoulis; A Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian.

Authors:  Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Noah H Silbert; Katherine Sternasty; David R Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?

Authors:  Brandi Jett; Emily Buss; Virginia Best; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Personalizing Transient Noise Reduction Algorithm Settings for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Annemijn L Tops; Phillipp Hehrmann; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.