Literature DB >> 26383088

Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.

Divya Jain1, Babita Ghai1, Indu Bala1, Komal Gandhi1, Gargi Banerjee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies that have compared and quantified the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) and adequacy of ventilation with supraglottic airway devices in different head and neck positions have been done in adult populations. The effects of head-neck position changes on the functioning of I-gel(™) in pediatric population still remain unevaluated. AIM: This study aimed to quantify the influence of different head and neck positions namely neutral, maximum flexion, and maximum extension on OPLP, ventilation scoring, and fiberoptic grading using I-gel(™) in anesthetized, paralyzed children.
METHODS: I-gel(™) was inserted in 30 paralyzed, anesthetized children scheduled for elective urological and orthopedic procedures. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in oxygen. Atracurium was administered intravenously to facilitate neuromuscular relaxation. Recordings of OPLP in neutral, maximum flexion, and maximum extension were taken as primary outcome. Fiberoptic grading, insertion of ryle's tube and ventilation scoring were also measured in different head and neck positions as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: The OPLP was significantly higher in flexion (27.6 ± 3.3 cm H2 O, P = 0.000) and lower in extension (19.6 ± 3.2 cm H2 O, P = 0.006) in comparison to the neutral position (23.2 ± 3.2 cm H2 O). There was a worsening of the fiberoptic view in flexion compared to neutral position (0/5/19/6 vs 5/21/4/0). The ventilation score was poorer (1 [0-3], P < 0.05) and peak inspiratory pressures higher in flexion (15.2 ± 1.4 cm H2 O, P = 0.000) compared to the neutral position (10.4 ± 1.6 cm H2 O).
CONCLUSION: Caution is warranted in pediatric patients while ventilating with I-gel(™) in extreme flexion of head and neck owing to poor ventilation despite increase in OPLP.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  I-gel™; different head and neck positions; fiberoptic grading; gastric tube insertion; oropharangeal leak pressures; ventilation scoring

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26383088     DOI: 10.1111/pan.12748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gargi Banerjee; Divya Jain; Indu Bala; Komal Gandhi; Ram Samujh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-02

2.  Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jin Ha Park; Ki-Young Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Hwan Ho Jung; Ji-Ho Kim; Bora Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel® and ProSeal LMA in children.

Authors:  Deepali P Thakur; Anila D Malde
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-02-04

4.  Effects of Passive Head-and-Neck Movements on the Performance of i-gel® Supraglottic Airway Device in Anesthetized Patients - A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Shreyasi Ray; Jyotirmay Kirtania
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2020-10-12

5.  Use of supraglottic airway devices in paediatric patients in the Indian context - some we know, some we need to know and march ahead.

Authors:  Priyam Saikia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-04

6.  Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask® versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Gurkaran Kaur Sidhu; Seema Jindal; Rupali Mahajan; Sheetal Bhagat
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.