| Literature DB >> 26381239 |
Hanwei Peng1, Steven J Wang2, Xiaohua Niu3,4, Xihong Yang3, Chongwei Chi5, Guojun Zhang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Radioactive tracer-based detection has been proposed as a standard procedure in identifying sentinel nodes for cN0 oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma. However, access to radioactive isotopes may be limited in some surgical centers, and there is potential risk of the radioactive tracers to the operators. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green combined with blue dye mapping in sentinel node biopsy for cN0 oral/oropharyngeal carcinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26381239 PMCID: PMC4574454 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0691-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Fig. 1One milliliter of indocyanine green at a concentration of 5 mg/ml was injected around the tumor in a four-quadrant pattern
Fig. 2After exposure of the subplatysmal plane in the neck and retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle posteriorly, fluorescent hot spots appeared under “near-infrared” light source
Fig. 3Color image of the sentinel nodes under “white” light source shows visible blue dye
Fig. 4Ex vivo sentinel nodes with or without blue dye
Fig. 5Ex vivo confirmation using OMIONS showed all sentinel nodes had fluorescent hot spots
Clinical data of the patients enrolled
| Pt No. | Age | Sex | Primary site | cTNM | ND type | Reconstruction | pTNM | SN site | SN no. (p+/total) | Other LN no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | M | Palate | T1N0M0 | SND | Local mucosal flap | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/2 | 0/12 |
| 2 | 55 | F | PGA | T1N0M0 | MRND | RFAF | T1N2M0 | IIa, III | 2/3, 0/2 | 0/19 |
| 3 | 51 | F | Tongue | T1N0M0 | MRND | None | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/6 | 0/22 |
| 4 | 59 | M | BOT | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T3N0M0 | IIa | 0/2 | 0/25 |
| 5 | 72 | M | Buccal | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T2N0M0 | Ib | 0/1 | 0/9 |
| 6 | 71 | F | Tongue | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T3N0M0 | IIa | 0/3 | 0/24 |
| 7 | 57 | M | Buccal | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T3N1M0 | Ib | 1/1 | 0/17 |
| 8 | 55 | M | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | IHMCF | T1N2MO | Ib, IIa | 1/2, 2/3 | 0/26 |
| 9 | 66 | F | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | None | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/3 | 0/24 |
| 10 | 49 | M | PGA | T1N0M0 | MRND | RFAF | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/9 | 0/17 |
| 11 | 56 | M | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | None | T1N0M0 | Ib, IIa | 0/1, 0/2 | 0/13 |
| 12 | 45 | F | Palate | T2N0M0 | SND | RFAF | T2N0M0 | IIa | 0/1 | 0/14 |
| 13 | 72 | M | PGA | T1N0M0 | MRND | RFAF | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/5 | 0/19 |
| 14 | 53 | F | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | None | T1N0M0 | Ib, IIa | 0/2, 0/2 | 0/12 |
| 15 | 73 | M | Buccal | T1N0M0 | SND | Skin graft | T1N0M0 | Ib | 0/6 | 0/12 |
| 16 | 47 | M | BOT | T1N0M0 | bi-SND | IHMCF | T1N0M0 | Ia | 0/1 | 0/30 |
| 17 | 75 | F | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | None | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/2 | 0/9 |
| 18 | 73 | M | Soft palate | T1N0M0 | SND | RFAF | T1N0M0 | IIa | 0/1 | 0/11 |
| 19 | 77 | F | Tongue | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T2N0M0 | Ia, IIa | 0/2, 0/3 | 0/17 |
| 20 | 55 | F | Tongue | T2N0M0 | MRND | None | T3N0M0 | Ia, III | 0/2, 0/2 | 0/39 |
| 21 | 64 | M | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | None | T1N1M0 | Ib,IIa | 1/1, 0/2 | 0/20 |
| 22 | 56 | M | BOT | T2N0M0 | SND | RFAF | T2N0M0 | IIa, III | 0/1, 0/3 | 0/18 |
| 23 | 76 | F | Tongue | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T2N0M0 | IIa | 0/1 | 0/29 |
| 24 | 50 | F | Tongue | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T2N0M0 | Ib, IIa | 0/2, 0/2 | 0/20 |
| 25 | 68 | F | Tongue | T2N0M0 | SND | None | T2N0M0 | Ia, IIa | 0/1, 0/2 | 0/17 |
| 26 | 62 | F | Tongue | T1N0M0 | SND | None | T1N0M0 | Ia, III | 0/1, 0/3 | 0/23 |
Abbreviations: ND neck dissection, SN sentinel node, LN lymph node, p+ pathologically positive, M male, F female, SND selective neck dissection, bi-SND bilateral selective neck dissection, cSND contralateral selective neck dissection, PGA palatoglossal arch, MRND modified radical neck dissection, RFAF radial forearm flap, BOT base of the tongue, IHMCF infrahyoid myocutaneous flap