Zuen Ren1, Shijie Zhou1, Zhidong Liu1, Shaofa Xu1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing 101149, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of induction treatment plus surgery for improving postoperative survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in stages IIIA-N2 is controversial, especially compared with the combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to quantitatively evaluate the survival benefit of preoperative induction treatment vs. combined chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: We systematically searched for trials that started after January, 1980. We excluded relevant studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Our primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was defined as the time from randomisation until death (any cause). Secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library were used for the study search. All analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS: Three studies (1,084 patients) were centrally selected and analyzed for the present meta-analysis. Combination of the three randomized controlled trials showed that there was no significant benefit of induction treatment plus surgery compared to combined chemoradiotherapy on 2-year OS [risk ratio (RR) =1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.17; P=0.98] and 4-year OS (RR =1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.51; P=0.39). However, from the subgroup analysis, it showed a significant PFS benefit (RR =1.78; 95% CI, 1.08-2.92; P=0.02) regarded chemoradiotherapy as preoperative induction treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone for induction treatment (PFS) (RR =1.05; 95% CI, 0.61-1.81; P=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant OS benefit of induction treatment plus surgery compared with combined chemoradiotherapy in patients with NSCLC (stages IIIA-pN2) at 2 and 4 years. However, we could conclude PFS could be improved when radiation therapy was added into preoperative induction treatment. Given the potential advantages of adding radiation preoperatively, clinicians should consider using this treatment strategy in the stage IIIA-N2 disease after fully assessment of the patients.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of induction treatment plus surgery for improving postoperative survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in stages IIIA-N2 is controversial, especially compared with the combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to quantitatively evaluate the survival benefit of preoperative induction treatment vs. combined chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: We systematically searched for trials that started after January, 1980. We excluded relevant studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Our primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was defined as the time from randomisation until death (any cause). Secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library were used for the study search. All analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS: Three studies (1,084 patients) were centrally selected and analyzed for the present meta-analysis. Combination of the three randomized controlled trials showed that there was no significant benefit of induction treatment plus surgery compared to combined chemoradiotherapy on 2-year OS [risk ratio (RR) =1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.17; P=0.98] and 4-year OS (RR =1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.51; P=0.39). However, from the subgroup analysis, it showed a significant PFS benefit (RR =1.78; 95% CI, 1.08-2.92; P=0.02) regarded chemoradiotherapy as preoperative induction treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone for induction treatment (PFS) (RR =1.05; 95% CI, 0.61-1.81; P=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant OS benefit of induction treatment plus surgery compared with combined chemoradiotherapy in patients with NSCLC (stages IIIA-pN2) at 2 and 4 years. However, we could conclude PFS could be improved when radiation therapy was added into preoperative induction treatment. Given the potential advantages of adding radiation preoperatively, clinicians should consider using this treatment strategy in the stage IIIA-N2 disease after fully assessment of the patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Induction treatment plus surgery; combined chemoradiotherapy; stages IIIA-N2 NSCLC
Authors: David S Ettinger; Wallace Akerley; Gerold Bepler; Matthew G Blum; Andrew Chang; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Thierry Jahan; Mohammad Jahanzeb; David H Johnson; Anne Kessinger; Ritsuko Komaki; Feng-Ming Kong; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug; Quynh-Thu Le; Inga T Lennes; Renato Martins; Janis O'Malley; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; George R Simon; Scott J Swanson; Douglas E Wood; Stephen C Yang Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Gail E Darling; Fei Li; Demetris Patsios; Christine Massey; Adam G Wallis; Linda Coate; Shaf Keshavjee; Andrew Pierre; Marc De Perrot; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Marcelo Cypel; Tom Waddell Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: W Eberhardt; H Wilke; G Stamatis; M Stuschke; A Harstrick; H Menker; B Krause; M R Müeller; M Stahl; M Flasshove; V Budach; D Greschuchna; N Konietzko; H Sack; S Seeber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Asad A Shah; Mark F Berry; Ching Tzao; Mihir Gandhi; Mathias Worni; Ricardo Pietrobon; Thomas A D'Amico Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: N Lorent; P De Leyn; Y Lievens; E Verbeken; K Nackaerts; C Dooms; D Van Raemdonck; B Anrys; J Vansteenkiste Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: David W Johnstone; Roger W Byhardt; David Ettinger; Charles B Scott Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R Rosell; J Gómez-Codina; C Camps; J Maestre; J Padille; A Cantó; J L Mate; S Li; J Roig; A Olazábal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jessica Glover; Frank O Velez-Cubian; Kavian Toosi; Emily Ng; Carla C Moodie; Joseph R Garrett; Jacques P Fontaine; Eric M Toloza Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Paul E Van Schil; Lawek Berzenji; Suresh K Yogeswaran; Jeroen M Hendriks; Patrick Lauwers Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Branislav Jeremic; Francesc Casas; Pavol Dubinsky; Antonio Gomez-Caamano; Nikola Cihoric; Gregory Videtic; Miroslav Latinovic Journal: J Radiat Res Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 2.724