| Literature DB >> 26380708 |
Sergei Volis1, Danara Ormanbekova2, Kanat Yermekbayev3.
Abstract
Species can adapt to new environmental conditions either through individual phenotypic plasticity, intraspecific genetic differentiation in adaptive traits, or both. Wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, an annual grass with major distribution in Eastern Mediterranean region, is predicted to experience in the near future, as a result of global climate change, conditions more arid than in any part of the current species distribution. To understand the role of the above two means of adaptation, and the effect of population range position, we analyzed reaction norms, extent of plasticity, and phenotypic selection across two experimental environments of high and low water availability in two core and two peripheral populations of this species. We studied 12 quantitative traits, but focused primarily on the onset of reproduction and maternal investment, which are traits that are closely related to fitness and presumably involved in local adaptation in the studied species. We hypothesized that the population showing superior performance under novel environmental conditions will either be genetically differentiated in quantitative traits or exhibit higher phenotypic plasticity than the less successful populations. We found the core population K to be the most plastic in all three trait categories (phenology, reproductive traits, and fitness) and most successful among populations studied, in both experimental environments; at the same time, the core K population was clearly genetically differentiated from the two edge populations. Our results suggest that (1) two means of successful adaptation to new environmental conditions, phenotypic plasticity and adaptive genetic differentiation, are not mutually exclusive ways of achieving high adaptive ability; and (2) colonists from some core populations can be more successful in establishing beyond the current species range than colonists from the range extreme periphery with conditions seemingly closest to those in the new environment.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; climate change; emmer wheat; peripheral populations; phenotypic plasticity; phenotypic selection; species range
Year: 2015 PMID: 26380708 PMCID: PMC4567883 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. dicoccoides) in its natural environment.
Repeated measures analysis of variance for the response to two water treatments in four populations of T. dicoccoides. The treatment effect estimates extent of phenotypic plasticity and treatment × population interactions indicate the inter-population genetic variation for plasticity
| Source of variation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | Type of trait | Population (df = 3) | Treatment (df = 1) | P × T (df = 3) |
| Days to awn appearance | Phenology | 79.5 | 18.0 | 13.4 |
| Days to maturation | Phenology | 39.6 | 3.3 ns | 14.3 |
| Flag leaf length | Reproductive | 50.3 | 299.8 | 24.8 |
| Penultimate leaf length | Reproductive | 90.6 | 471.3 | 21.9 |
| Flag leaf width | Reproductive | 66.0 | 60.7 | 0.3 ns |
| Penultimate leaf width | Reproductive | 151.3 | 184.8 | 3.9 |
| Awn length | Reproductive | 33.7 | 35.3 | 3.0 |
| Spike length | Reproductive | 27.4 | 76.3 | 1.3 ns |
| Spikelets per spike | Reproductive | 50.9 | 147.2 | 3.2 |
| Spikelet weight (mg) | Reproductive | 306.1 | 59.7 | 9.6 |
| Total seed weight (g) | Fitness | 170.4 | 702.1 | 63.1 |
| Total seed number | Fitness | 28.9 | 347.9 | 27.3 |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, ns not significant. df error = 220.
Figure 2The population means (±SE) for 12 quantitative traits under two water treatments.
Figure 3Individual reaction norms for days to awning and spikelet weight in four populations of emmer wheat. Each line depicts a unique genotype values under low water (LW) and high water (HW) treatment.
Standardized linear selection differentials for ten traits measured on plants of different population origin grown under two water treatments. Correlation coefficients significant after sequential Bonferroni adjustment are in bold
| Standardized selection differentials | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | K | N | MH | |||||
| HW | LW | HW | LW | HW | LW | HW | LW | |
| Days to awn appearance | 0.32 | −0.13 | −0.34 | −0.36 | −0.31 | |||
| Days to maturation | −0.25 | 0.24 | −0.11 | −0.28 | −0.32 | −0.41 | ||
| Flag leaf length | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.07 | −0.02 | 0.22 | 0.33 | ||
| Flag leaf width | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.33 | −0.05 | |
| Penultimate leaf length | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.18 | |
| Penultimate leaf width | 0.08 | 0.27 | −0.14 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.16 | |
| Awn length | 0.34 | 0.62 | 0.08 | 0.36 | ||||
| Spike length | 0.23 | 0.55 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.37 | |||
| Spikelets per spike | −0.07 | 0.00 | −0.33 | 0.11 | −0.25 | 0.05 | −0.24 | 0.18 |
| Spikelet weight | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.11 | ||||
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Standardized linear selection gradients (±SE) for ten traits measured on plants of different population origin grown under two water treatments. Correlation coefficients significant after sequential Bonferroni adjustment are in bold
| Standardized selection gradients | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | K | N | MH | |||||
| Traits | HW | LW | HW | LW | HW | LW | HW | LW |
| Days to awn appearance | −0.28 ± 0.24 | −0.39 ± 0.34 | −0.77 ± 0.60 | −0.79 ± 0.53 | −0.35 ± 0.39 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | −0.17 ± 0.19 | |
| Days to maturation | 0.26 ± 0.21 | −0.33 ± 0.24 | 0.11 ± 0.32 | 0.56 ± 0.53 | 0.66 ± 0.56 | 0.13 ± 0.39 | −0.39 ± 0.24 | −0.41 ± 0.18 |
| Flag leaf length | −0.58 ± 0.23 | −0.28 ± 0.26 | −0.57 ± 0.36 | −0.42 ± 0.22 | 0.04 ± 0.18 | 0.46 ± 0.27 | −0.49 ± 0.22 | |
| Flag leaf width | 0.41 ± 0.25 | 0.42 ± 0.17 | 0.17 ± 0.24 | 0.36 ± 0.26 | 0.05 ± 0.18 | 0.11 ± 0.20 | −0.06 ± 0.15 | 0.20 ± 0.16 |
| Penultimate leaf length | 0.22 ± 0.17 | 0.22 ± 0.26 | 0.08 ± 0.32 | 0.30 ± 0.20 | −0.16 ± 0.17 | −0.64 ± 0.31 | 0.44 ± 0.15 | |
| Penultimate leaf width | −0.33 ± 0.22 | −0.05 ± 0.12 | −0.43 ± 0.15 | −0.16 ± 0.27 | 0.27 ± 0.21 | −0.19 ± 0.20 | 0.02 ± 0.26 | 0.06 ± 0.11 |
| Awn length | 0.31 ± 0.27 | 0.05 ± 0.21 | −0.10 ± 0.31 | 0.27 ± 0.38 | 0.43 ± 0.43 | 0.60 ± 0.25 | ||
| Spike length | 0.86 ± 0.30 | 0.022 ± 0.31 | 0.21 ± 0.26 | 0.35 ± 0.36 | −0.17 ± 0.45 | −0.76 ± 0.34 | −0.26 ± 0.45 | −0.44 ± 0.24 |
| Spikelets per spike | 0.20 ± 0.16 | −0.02 ± 0.15 | 0.42 ± 0.21 | −0.06 ± 0.24 | 0.12 ± 0.15 | −0.43 ± 0.27 | −0.04 ± 0.14 | |
| Spikelet weight | 0.26 ± 0.15 | 0.44 ± 0.20 | 0.37 ± 0.19 | 0.31 ± 0.18 | ||||
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Path analysis of selection in the four populations under low water (LW) and high water (HW) treatments. Line thickness indicates magnitude of path coefficients. Solid and dashed lines denote positive and negative relationship, respectively. The value above the box with days to anthesis denotes the total effect of this trait on total weight of spikelets.