Literature DB >> 26379950

An in vitro and in vivo validation of a novel color-coded syringe device for measuring the intracuff pressure in cuffed endotracheal tubes.

Mineto Kamata1, Hiromi Kako1, Archana S Ramesh1, Senthil G Krishna2, Joseph D Tobias3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical practice of pediatric anesthesiology has changed with a transition to the use of cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) in infants and children. The monitoring of intracuff pressure has been suggested as one means to limit the potential for damage to the tracheal mucosa. The current study evaluates the accuracy of a novel, color-coded syringe device which provides three zones (green, clear, and red) to estimate the intracuff pressure.
METHOD: The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 was an in vitro study where cuffed ETTs of sizes 4.0 mm, 5.0 mm and 6.0 mm ID were placed into polyvinylchloride tubing of appropriate sizes. A manometer and the syringe device were simultaneously attached to measure the intracuff pressure at the middle of the 3 different zones on the device (red, clear, and green). Phase 2 was an in vivo study where the syringe device and the manometer were simultaneously attached to the pilot balloon to measure the intracuff pressure and the corresponding zone on the color-coded syringe following endotracheal intubation. Statistical analysis included a descriptive reporting of the mean ± SD, median, range, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the actual intracuff pressure readings at the three zones of the syringe device during both its in vitro and in vivo use.
RESULTS: For phase 1 of the study, the 95% CI for the green, clear, and red zones were 21.5-21.8, 29.2-29.5, and 46.5-47.4 cmH2O respectively. This correlated well with the manufacturer reported values of 20-30, 30-40, and 40-60 cmH2O for the 3 zones (green, clear, and red respectively). Phase 2 of the study included 200 patients ranging in age from 0.1 to 21.8 years (6.7 ± 5.1 years) and in weight from 4.0 to 129.1 kilograms (29.4 ± 23.3 kgs). The size of the ETTs ranged from 3.0 to 7.0 mm ID. The intracuff pressure measured by the manometer ranged from 4 to 65 cmH2O (27.6 ± 9.7 cmH2O). The 95% CI for the green, clear, and red zones were 20.5-21.7, 27.7-29.1, and 41.2-46.5 cmH2O respectively. There was no significant differences noted when comparing different patient ages or sizes of ETT.
CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates a clinically acceptable correlation between the zones on this novel, color-coded syringe device and the actual measurement of the intracuff pressure obtained by a manometer for both in vitro and in vivo use. This device is a simple, reliable, portable and affordable method to monitor intracuff pressure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracuff pressure; cuffed endotracheal tube; pediatric anesthesia

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379950      PMCID: PMC4565333     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cuffed tracheal tubes in children: past, present and future.

Authors:  Markus Weiss; Alexander Dullenkopf
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Inspiratory stridor after tracheal intubation with a MicroCuff® tracheal tube in three young infants.

Authors:  Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy; Jerrold Lerman; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Doron Feldman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  The trachea and cuff-induced tracheal injury. An experimental study on causative factors and prevention.

Authors:  U Nordin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1977

4.  Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of effects of four large volume cuffs.

Authors:  R D Seegobin; G L van Hasselt
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-31

5.  Cuffed endotracheal tubes in children reduce sevoflurane and medical gas consumption and related costs.

Authors:  S Eschertzhuber; B Salgo; A Schmitz; W Roth; A Frotzler; C H Keller; A C Gerber; M Weiss
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children during general anesthesia.

Authors:  H H Khine; D H Corddry; R G Kettrick; T M Martin; J J McCloskey; J B Rose; M C Theroux; M Zagnoev
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Cuffed endotracheal tubes in infants and children: should we routinely measure the cuff pressure?

Authors:  Joseph D Tobias; Lawrence Schwartz; Julie Rice; Kris Jatana; D Richard Kang
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children.

Authors:  M Weiss; A Dullenkopf; J E Fischer; C Keller; A C Gerber
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  An in vitro and in vivo validation of a novel monitor for intracuff pressure in cuffed endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  Archana S Ramesh; Senthil G Krishna; William T Denman; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.556

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the correct inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff: a larger pilot balloon increases the sensitivity of the 'finger-pressure' technique, but it remains poorly reliable in clinical practice.

Authors:  Antonio Pisano; Luigi Verniero; Nicola Galdieri; Antonio Corcione
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The effect of esophagogastroduodenoscopy probe insertion on the intracuff pressure of airway devices in children during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Onur Balaban; Mineto Kamata; Mumin Hakim; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.