Literature DB >> 26379403

Novel 3-dimensional virtual hepatectomy simulation combined with real-time deformation.

Yukio Oshiro1, Hiroaki Yano1, Jun Mitani1, Sangtae Kim1, Jaejeong Kim1, Kiyoshi Fukunaga1, Nobuhiro Ohkohchi1.   

Abstract

AIM: To develop a novel 3-dimensional (3D) virtual hepatectomy simulation software, Liversim, to visualize the real-time deformation of the liver.
METHODS: We developed a novel real-time virtual hepatectomy simulation software program called Liversim. The software provides 4 basic functions: viewing 3D models from arbitrary directions, changing the colors and opacities of the models, deforming the models based on user interaction, and incising the liver parenchyma and intrahepatic vessels based on user operations. From April 2010 through 2013, 99 patients underwent virtual hepatectomies that used the conventional software program SYNAPSE VINCENT preoperatively. Between April 2012 and October 2013, 11 patients received virtual hepatectomies using the novel software program Liversim; these hepatectomies were performed both preoperatively and at the same that the actual hepatectomy was performed in an operating room. The perioperative outcomes were analyzed between the patients for whom SYNAPSE VINCENT was used and those for whom Liversim was used. Furthermore, medical students and surgical residents were asked to complete questionnaires regarding the new software.
RESULTS: There were no obvious discrepancies (i.e., the emergence of branches in the portal vein or hepatic vein or the depth and direction of the resection line) between our simulation and the actual surgery during the resection process. The median operating time was 304 min (range, 110 to 846) in the VINCENT group and 397 min (range, 232 to 497) in the Liversim group (P = 0.30). The median amount of intraoperative bleeding was 510 mL (range, 18 to 5120) in the VINCENT group and 470 mL (range, 130 to 1600) in the Liversim group (P = 0.44). The median postoperative stay was 12 d (range, 6 to 100) in the VINCENT group and 13 d (range, 9 to 21) in the Liversim group (P = 0.36). There were no significant differences in the preoperative outcomes between the two groups. Liversim was not found to be clinically inferior to SYNAPSE VINCENT. Both students and surgical residents reported that the Liversim image was almost the same as the actual hepatectomy.
CONCLUSION: Virtual hepatectomy with real-time deformation of the liver using Liversim is useful for the safe performance of hepatectomies and for surgical education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver; Real-time deformation; Simulation; Surgery; Surgical education; Virtual hepatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379403      PMCID: PMC4566391          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning.

Authors:  Dirk Selle; Bernhard Preim; Andrea Schenk; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  CT- and MRI-based volumetry of resected liver specimen: comparison to intraoperative volume and weight measurements and calculation of conversion factors.

Authors:  C Karlo; C S Reiner; P Stolzmann; S Breitenstein; B Marincek; D Weishaupt; T Frauenfelder
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Novel virtual hepatectomy is useful for evaluation of the portal territory for anatomical sectionectomy, segmentectomy, and hemihepatectomy.

Authors:  Shun-Ichi Ariizumi; Yutaka Takahashi; Yoshihito Kotera; Akiko Omori; Godai Yoneda; Han Mu; Satoshi Katagiri; Hiroto Egawa; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  The impact of 3-D virtual hepatectomy simulation in living-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Junichi Yamanaka; Shinichi Saito; Yuji Iimuro; Tadamichi Hirano; Toshihiro Okada; Nobukazu Kuroda; Takaaki Sugimoto; Jiro Fujimoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006

5.  Impact of virtual reality imaging on hepatic liver tumor resection: calculation of risk.

Authors:  H G Rau; R Schauer; T Helmberger; N Holzknecht; B von Rückmann; L Meyer; E Buttler; M Kessler; G Zahlmann; D Schuhmann; F W Schildberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery.

Authors:  W Lamadé; G Glombitza; L Fischer; P Chiu; C E Cárdenas; M Thorn; H P Meinzer; L Grenacher; H Bauer; T Lehnert; C Herfarth
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-11

Review 7.  Liver resection and transplantation using a novel 3D hepatectomy simulation system.

Authors:  J Fujimoto; J Yamanaka
Journal:  Adv Med Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.287

8.  Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms.

Authors:  S J Wigmore; D N Redhead; X J Yan; J Casey; K Madhavan; C H Dejong; E J Currie; O J Garden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Accurate preoperative estimation of liver-graft volumetry using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Shoji Hiroshige; Mitsuo Shimada; Noboru Harada; Satoko Shiotani; Mizuki Ninomiya; Ryousuke Minagawa; Yuji Soejima; Taketoshi Suehiro; Hiroshi Honda; Makoto Hashizume; Keizo Sugimachi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Prospective volumetric assessment of the liver on a personal computer by nonradiologists prior to partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  Simon A W G Dello; Jan H M B Stoot; Rogier S A van Stiphout; Johanne G Bloemen; Stephen J Wigmore; Cornelis H C Dejong; Ronald M van Dam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Simulation and navigation liver surgery: an update after 2,000 virtual hepatectomies.

Authors:  Akinori Miyata; Junichi Arita; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2020-10-31

2.  Novel imaging using a touchless display for computer-assisted hepato-biliary surgery.

Authors:  Yukio Oshiro; Kenoki Ohuchida; Toshiyuki Okada; Makoto Hashizume; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Application of three-dimensional visualization technique in preoperative planning of progressive hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Qi-Lu Qiao; Xiao-Chao Guo; Jian-Xun Zhao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Mediastinal pulmonary artery is associated with greater artery diameter and lingular division volume.

Authors:  Hitoshi Dejima; Yusuke Takahashi; Tai Hato; Katsutoshi Seto; Tetsuya Mizuno; Hiroaki Kuroda; Noriaki Sakakura; Masafumi Kawamura; Yukinori Sakao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation of the SYNAPSE VINCENT for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer with robotic surgery: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Yuta Sato; Jesse Yu Tajima; Shigeru Kiyama; Takao Takahashi; Masashi Kuno; Masahide Endo; Masahiro Fukada; Chika Mizutani; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Itaru Yasufuku; Tomonari Suetsugu; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Katsutoshi Murase; Takuya Saiki; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Essential updates 2020/2021: Current topics of simulation and navigation in hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yu Saito; Mitsuo Shimada; Yuji Morine; Shinichiro Yamada; Maki Sugimoto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 7.  Computational Modeling in Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Bruno Christ; Uta Dahmen; Karl-Heinz Herrmann; Matthias König; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Tim Ricken; Jana Schleicher; Lars Ole Schwen; Sebastian Vlaic; Navina Waschinsky
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.