OBJECTIVE: To compare virtual volume to intraoperative volume and weight measurements of resected liver specimen and calculate appropriate conversion factors to reach better correlation. METHODS: Preoperative (CT-group, n=30; MRI-group, n=30) and postoperative MRI (n=60) imaging was performed in 60 patients undergoing partial liver resection. Intraoperative volume and weight of the resected liver specimen was measured. Virtual volume measurements were performed by two readers (R1,R2) using dedicated software. Conversion factors were calculated. RESULTS: Mean intraoperative resection weight/volume: CT: 855 g/852 mL; MRI: 872 g/860 mL. Virtual resection volume: CT: 960 mL(R1), 982 mL(R2); MRI: 1112 mL(R1), 1115 mL(R2). Strong positive correlation for both readers between intraoperative and virtual measurements, mean of both readers: CT: R=0.88(volume), R=0.89(weight); MRI: R=0.95(volume), R=0.92(weight). Conversion factors: 0.85(CT), 0.78(MRI). CONCLUSION: CT- or MRI-based volumetry of resected liver specimen is accurate and recommended for preoperative planning. A conversion of the result is necessary to improve intraoperative and virtual measurement correlation. We found 0.85 for CT- and 0.78 for MRI-based volumetry the most appropriate conversion factors. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To compare virtual volume to intraoperative volume and weight measurements of resected liver specimen and calculate appropriate conversion factors to reach better correlation. METHODS: Preoperative (CT-group, n=30; MRI-group, n=30) and postoperative MRI (n=60) imaging was performed in 60 patients undergoing partial liver resection. Intraoperative volume and weight of the resected liver specimen was measured. Virtual volume measurements were performed by two readers (R1,R2) using dedicated software. Conversion factors were calculated. RESULTS: Mean intraoperative resection weight/volume: CT: 855 g/852 mL; MRI: 872 g/860 mL. Virtual resection volume: CT: 960 mL(R1), 982 mL(R2); MRI: 1112 mL(R1), 1115 mL(R2). Strong positive correlation for both readers between intraoperative and virtual measurements, mean of both readers: CT: R=0.88(volume), R=0.89(weight); MRI: R=0.95(volume), R=0.92(weight). Conversion factors: 0.85(CT), 0.78(MRI). CONCLUSION:CT- or MRI-based volumetry of resected liver specimen is accurate and recommended for preoperative planning. A conversion of the result is necessary to improve intraoperative and virtual measurement correlation. We found 0.85 for CT- and 0.78 for MRI-based volumetry the most appropriate conversion factors. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Kenji Suzuki; Mark L Epstein; Ryan Kohlbrenner; Shailesh Garg; Masatoshi Hori; Aytekin Oto; Richard L Baron Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Larry Cai; Benjamin M Yeh; Antonio C Westphalen; John P Roberts; Zhen J Wang Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: So Yeong Jeong; Kyoung Won Kim; Jeongjin Lee; Jin Kyoo Jang; Heon-Ju Kwon; Gi Won Song; Sung Gyu Lee Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: Amber L Simpson; David A Geller; Alan W Hemming; William R Jarnagin; Logan W Clements; Michael I D'Angelica; Prashanth Dumpuri; Mithat Gönen; Ivan Zendejas; Michael I Miga; James D Stefansic Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Julie A Fitzpatrick; Jin Un Kim; Jeremy F L Cobbold; Mark J W McPhail; Mary M E Crossey; Aluel A Bak-Bol; Ashraf Zaky; Simon D Taylor-Robinson Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2015-12-06