| Literature DB >> 26379361 |
Xiaoyue Song1, Weiyan You2, Jianbo Zhu1, Xiaobin Cui1, Jianming Hu1, Yunzhao Chen1, Wei Liu1, Lianghai Wang1, Shugang Li3, Yutao Wei2, Lan Yang1, Feng Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC), an aggressive digestive tract malignancy, is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Besides environmental risk factors, genetic factors might play a key role in the EC carcinogenesis. The aim of the study is to evaluate the association of miR219-1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with EC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26379361 PMCID: PMC4561329 DOI: 10.1155/2015/541531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Characteristics of ESCC cases and controls.
| Variables | Cases [ | Controls [ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 56.23 (±9.02) | 55.16 (±10.62) | 0.212b |
| Age (years) | 0.334 | ||
| <57 | 122 (49.2) | 160 (53.3) | |
| ≥57 | 126 (50.8) | 140 (46.7) | |
| Sex | 0.212 | ||
| Male | 143 (57.7) | 157 (52.3) | |
| Female | 105 (42.3) | 143 (47.7) | |
| Differentiation status | |||
| Well-differentiated | 47 (19.0) | ||
| Moderately differentiated | 152 (61.2) | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 49 (19.8) | ||
| Tumor location | |||
| Upper | 14 (5.6) | ||
| Middle + lower | 234 (94.4) | ||
| Depth of invasion | |||
| T1/T2 | 98 (42.2) | ||
| T3/T4 | 134 (57.8) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| No | 132 (53.2) | ||
| Yes | 116 (46.8) | ||
| Tumor node metastasis stage | |||
| I-II | 154 (64.7) | ||
| III-IV | 84 (35.3) |
aTwo-sided χ 2 test.
bStudent's t-test.
Primary information for miR-219-1 polymorphisms.
| Gene | Genotyped SNPs | Chromosome | MAFa for Chinese in database | MAF in our controls |
| RefSNP alleles | Ancestral allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR219-1 | rs107822 | 6 | 0.433 | 0.492 | 0.323 | A/G | G |
| rs213210 | 6 | 0.422 | 0.170 | 0.954 | C/T | T |
aMAF: minor allele frequency; bHWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Logistic regression analyses of associations between miR-219-1 rs107822G > A and rs213210T > C polymorphisms and risk of Kazakh ESCC.
| Genotype | Cases [ | Controls [ |
Crude OR |
|
Adjusted ORa
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |||||
| miR-219-1 (rs107822G > A) | ||||||
| GG | 65 (32.8) | 67 (24.6) | 1 | 1 | ||
| GA | 98 (49.5) | 104 (38.2) | 0.971 (0.626–1.506) | 0.897 | 0.976 (0.626–1.522) | 0.914 |
| AA | 35 (17.7) | 101 (37.2) |
|
|
|
|
| GG vs. GA vs. AA |
| |||||
| GA+AA | 133 (67.2) | 205 (75.4) | 0.6669 (0.446–1.003) | 0.052 | 0.677 (0.449–1.021) | 0.063 |
| GG+GA | 163 (82.3) | 171 (62.8) | 1 | 1 | ||
| AA | 35 (17.7) | 101 (37.2) |
|
|
|
|
| G allele | 228 (57.6) | 238 (43.8) | 1 | |||
| A allele | 168 (42.4) | 306 (56.2) |
|
| ||
| miR-219-1 (rs213210T > C) | ||||||
| TT | 161 (65.7) | 195 (68.4) | 1 | 1 | ||
| CT | 78 (31.8) | 83 (29.2) | 1.138 (0.784–1.653) | 0.496 | 1.172 (0.805–1.709) | 0.408 |
| CC | 6 (2.5) | 7 (2.4) | 1.038 (0.342–3.151) | 0.947 | 1.057 (0.346–3.231) | 0.923 |
| TT vs. CT vs. CC | 0.793 | |||||
| CT+CC | 84 (34.3) | 90 (31.6) | 1.130 (0.786–1.626) | 0.508 | 1.164 (0.806–1.680) | 0.419 |
| TT+TC | 259 (97.5) | 278 (97.6) | 1 | 1 | ||
| CC | 6 (2.5) | 7 (2.4) | 0.997 (0.331–3.007) | 0.996 | 1.003 (0.330–3.044) | 0.996 |
| T allele | 400 (81.6) | 473 (83) | 1 | |||
| C allele | 90 (18.4) | 97 (17) | 1.097 (0.800–1.505) | 0.565 |
aLogistic regression adjusted for age and sex.
P values under 0.05 were indicated in bold font.
Stratification analyses between miR-219-1 rs107822G > A polymorphism and clinicopathological parameters of Kazakh ESCC patients.
| Parameter | GG | GA | AA | GG | GA | AA | GA+AA | GG+GA | AA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case/control | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| |||||
| Gendera | |||||||||||||
| Male | 36/47 | 51/51 | 25/41 | 1.00 | 1.306 (0.729–2.337) | 0.369 | 0.796 (0.411–1.540) | 0.498 | 1.079 (0.635–1.832) | 0.780 | 1.00 | 0.687 (0.386–1.221) | 0.199 |
| Female | 19/30 | 37/53 | 30/50 | 1.00 | 1.102 (0.541–2.246) | 0.789 | 0.947 (0.456–1.969) | 0.885 | 1.027 (0.535–1.971) | 0.936 | 1.00 | 0.889 (0.505–1.565) | 0.684 |
| Agea | |||||||||||||
| <57 | 27/45 | 33/54 | 28/48 | 1.00 | 0.968 (0.514–1.822) | 0.920 | 0.715 (0.313–1.631) | 0.424 | 0.893 (0.491–1.624) | 0.711 | 1.00 | 0.737 (0.354–1.532) | 0.413 |
| ≥57 | 38/32 | 45/50 | 27/43 | 1.00 | 0.758 (0.408–1.408) | 0.380 | 0.529 (0.270–1.036) | 0.062 | 0.652 (0.372–1.144) | 0.135 | 1.00 | 0.620 (0.351–1.087) | 0.099 |
| Histologic gradeb | |||||||||||||
| Well-differentiated | 12 | 15 | 5 | 1.00 | 1.345 (0.569–3.184) | 0.500 | 1.573 (0.49–5.051) | 0.447 | 1.401 (0.619–3.170) | 0.419 | 1.00 | 1.312 (0.460–3.742) | 0.611 |
| Moderately/poorly differentiated | 53 | 83 | 30 | ||||||||||
| Depth of invasionb | |||||||||||||
| T1+T2 | 16 | 33 | 13 | 1.00 | 0.603 (0.289–1.258) | 0.178 | 0.461 (0.180–1.183) | 0.107 | 0.564 (0.279–1.141) | 0.111 | 1.00 | 0.641 (0.288–1.427) | 0.276 |
| T3+T4 | 44 | 59 | 19 | ||||||||||
| Lymph node metastasisb | |||||||||||||
| No | 34 | 47 | 23 | 1.00 | 1.261 (0.665–2.393) | 0.477 | 0.620 (0.261–1.475) | 0.280 | 1.058 (0.576–1.945) | 0.856 | 1.00 | 0.537 (0.249–1.158) | 0.113 |
| Yes | 31 | 51 | 12 | ||||||||||
| TNM stageb | |||||||||||||
| I+II | 38 | 58 | 19 | 1.00 | 1.075 (0.548–2.111) | 0.833 | 1.234 (0.505–3.015) | 0.644 | 1.113 (0.586–2.114) | 0.744 | 1.00 | 1.180 (0.537–2.592) | 0.681 |
| III+IV | 24 | 36 | 13 | ||||||||||
aStratification analysis to evaluate the effects of variant genotypes on the risk of ESCC by age and sex.
bLogistic regression analysis for the effects of miR-219-1 variants on risk of Kazakh ESCC with different histologic grade, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and clinical stage.
Figure 1Linkage disquilibrium graph of the two SNPs, rs107822 and rs213210, in the miR-219-1 gene in the Kazakh population. The linkage disequilibrium values were caculated using r 2 and D′ statistic (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/SHEsisMain.htm). (a) Linkage disequilibrium analysis in the cases group (coefficient D′ = 0.8808, coefficient r 2 = 0.2503). (b) Linkage disequilibrium analysis in the controls group (coefficient D′ = 1, coefficient r 2 = 0.1732). Areas with red blocks represent stronger linkage disequilibrium.
Distribution of miR-219-1 haplotypes and their association with Kazakh ESCC.
| Haplotypes | Haplotype frequenciesa | OR (95% CI ) |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases [( | Controls [( | ||||
| ( | ( | ||||
| AC | 70 (17.8) | 90 (17.2) | 1.049 (0.744–1.480) | 0.075 | 0.78 |
| AT | 98 (24.8) | 195 (37.4) | 0.559 (0.419–0.747) | 15.645 | 7.72 × 10−5 |
| GC | 3 (0.7) | 0 (0.00) | — | — | — |
| GT | 223 (56.6) | 237 (45.4) | 1.597 (1.227–2.080) | 12.139 | 4.97 × 10−4 |
The combination order of SNP is as follows: rs107822G/A, rs213210 C/T.
aOnly haplotypes with frequencies of ≥0.03% are shown.
b P value for difference in haplotype frequencies between cases and control.
Haplotype frequencies were obtained using SHEsis Software (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/SHEsisMain.htm).
Figure 2miR-219-1-5p expression level in ESCC tissues. (a) miR-219-1-5p levels were determined in normal tissue and tumor tissue samples from ESCC patients (N = 100) by qRT-PCR. All values were normalized to U6 RNA levels. Mean expression levels were 3.732 × 10−3 in normal tissue sample and 7.840 × 10−3 in tumor tissue sample (P = 0.287). (b) miR-219-1-5p levels were determined for different genotype in normal tissue and tumor tissue samples from ESCC patients (N = 100). All values were normalized to U6 RNA levels. Mean expression levels for rs107822 genotypes are 9.4 × 10−3 (GG, normal), 4.0 × 10−4 (GA, normal), and 5.0 × 10−4 (AA, normal) and 2.1 × 10−2 (GG, tumor), 3.0 × 10−4 (GA, tumor), and 4.0 × 10−4 (AA, tumor). P GG-GA normal = 1.3 × 10−4, P GG-AA normal = 0.001; P GG-GA tumor = 0.004, P GG-AA tumor = 0.012.