Ronald T Ackermann1, David T Liss1, Emily A Finch1, Karen K Schmidt1, Laura M Hays1, David G Marrero1, Chandan Saha1. 1. Ronald T. Ackermann, David T. Liss, and Emily A. Finch are with the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. Karen K. Schmidt and David G. Marrero are with the Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Laura M. Hays is with the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis. Chandan Saha is with the Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the weight loss effectiveness of a YMCA model for the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention. METHODS:Between July 2008 and November 2010, we individually randomized 509 overweight or obese, low-income, nondiabetic adults with elevated blood glucose in Indianapolis, Indiana, to receivestandard care plus brief lifestyle counseling or be offered a group-based YMCA adaptation of the DPP (YDPP). Primary outcome was mean weight loss difference at 12 months. In our intention-to-treat analyses, we used longitudinal linear or logistic regression, multiply imputing missing observations. We used instrumental variables regression to estimate weight loss effectiveness among participants completing 9 or more intervention lessons. RESULTS: In the YDPP arm, 161 (62.6%) participants attended ≥ 1 lesson and 103 (40.0%) completed 9 or more lessons. In intention-to-treat analysis, mean 12-month weight loss was 2.3 kilograms (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1, 3.4 kg) more for the YDPP arm than for standard care participants. In instrumental variable analyses, persons attending 9 or more lessons had a 5.3-kilogram (95% CI = 2.8, 7.9 kg) greater weight loss than did those with standard care alone. CONCLUSIONS: The YMCA model for DPP delivery achieves meaningful weight loss at 12 months among low-income adults.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the weight loss effectiveness of a YMCA model for the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention. METHODS: Between July 2008 and November 2010, we individually randomized 509 overweight or obese, low-income, nondiabetic adults with elevated blood glucose in Indianapolis, Indiana, to receive standard care plus brief lifestyle counseling or be offered a group-based YMCA adaptation of the DPP (YDPP). Primary outcome was mean weight loss difference at 12 months. In our intention-to-treat analyses, we used longitudinal linear or logistic regression, multiply imputing missing observations. We used instrumental variables regression to estimate weight loss effectiveness among participants completing 9 or more intervention lessons. RESULTS: In the YDPP arm, 161 (62.6%) participants attended ≥ 1 lesson and 103 (40.0%) completed 9 or more lessons. In intention-to-treat analysis, mean 12-month weight loss was 2.3 kilograms (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1, 3.4 kg) more for the YDPP arm than for standard care participants. In instrumental variable analyses, persons attending 9 or more lessons had a 5.3-kilogram (95% CI = 2.8, 7.9 kg) greater weight loss than did those with standard care alone. CONCLUSIONS: The YMCA model for DPP delivery achieves meaningful weight loss at 12 months among low-income adults.
Authors: Sanford A Garfield; Saul Malozowski; Marshall H Chin; K M Venkat Narayan; Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence W Green; Roland G Hiss; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michael Schoenbaum; Jürgen Unützer; Daniel McCaffrey; Naihua Duan; Cathy Sherbourne; Kenneth B Wells Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: William V Tamborlane; Craig Kollman; Michael W Steffes; Katrina J Ruedy; Xing Dongyuan; Roy W Beck; Peter Chase; Larry A Fox; Darrell M Wilson; Eva Tsalikian Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rena R Wing; Richard F Hamman; George A Bray; Linda Delahanty; Sharon L Edelstein; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; Mary A Hoskin; Andrea Kriska; John Lachin; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Judith G Regensteiner; Beth Venditti; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Obes Res Date: 2004-09
Authors: Kathleen M McTigue; Russell Harris; Brian Hemphill; Linda Lux; Sonya Sutton; Audrina J Bunton; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: William H Hernan; Michael Brandle; Ping Zhang; David F Williamson; Margaret J Matulik; Robert E Ratner; John M Lachin; Michael M Engelgau Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Laura M Hays; Helena M Hoen; James E Slaven; Emily A Finch; David G Marrero; Chandan Saha; Ronald T Ackermann Journal: Am J Health Educ Date: 2016-08-30
Authors: Stephanie A P Schuette; Evelyn Cordero; Katherine Slosburg; Elizabeth L Addington; David Victorson Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2017-05-05
Authors: David T Liss; Emily A Finch; Andrew Cooper; Avani Sheth; Ashantí D Tejuosho; Nicola Lancki; Ronald T Ackermann Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Mara Z Vitolins; Scott P Isom; Caroline S Blackwell; Donna Kernodle; Joyce M Sydell; Carolyn F Pedley; Jeffrey A Katula; L Douglas Case; David C Goff Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Rebecca A Krukowski; Marion E Hare; Gerald W Talcott; Leslie A Gladney; Karen C Johnson; Phyllis A Richey; Mehmet Kocak; Patrick L Keller; Ann Hryshko-Mullen; Robert C Klesges Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Matthew J O'Brien; Margaret R Moran; Joyce W Tang; Maria C Vargas; Mary Talen; Laura J Zimmermann; Ronald T Ackermann; Namratha R Kandula Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: David T Liss; Emily A Finch; Dyanna L Gregory; Andrew Cooper; Ronald T Ackermann Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 2.226